Difference Between Seligman And Peterson

Inversely, according to Ingersoll-Dayton, & Ha (2009), forgiveness regarded replacing negative behaviors and thinking towards the offender in hopes of rendering inner

“Forgiveness, assert Fincham and his colleagues, can help restore more benevolent and cooperative goals to relationships” Everett L. Worthington, Jr.(2004). New Science of Forgiveness.

The motivation and tendency of people to forgive others remains an important topic of discussion. In today’s society most people at some period have experienced feeling of un forgiveness towards friend, or relatives. “Forgiveness was defined as the ability to relinquish of resentment towards others” (Baskin & Enright, 2004, p. 80).

Throughout life everyone has been in a situation where they were offended or they have offended someone else. Therefore, forgiving someone is therapeutic for the victim, and the offended. However, when someone is wronged, justice is what they seek. On the contrary, when people feel pain from being wronged, they experience an “injustice gap.” Worthington defines “injustice gap” as, “the difference between the way the person would like a transgression to be resolved, and the way things are perceived to be currently” (Worthington Jr, 2005, pg. 121).

In the last 15 years, Everett has thoroughly studied how forgiveness and justice collaborate. His interest in this topic peaked after his mother was murdered which at the time was very devastating for him, as can be to anyone. Over time, Everett forgave the person who murdered his mother. Everett fiercely believes the art of forgiveness was passed to them through their mother. Everett had a brother which committed suicide as a result of the agony he dealt with in his mother’s passing. After the commitment of his brother’s suicide, he felt great self-blame and has since studied self-forgiveness

Hesburgh explains, “My whole instinct is to forgive. Perhaps that is because I am a Catholic priest. In a sense, I am in the forgiving business… I think of God as the great forgiver of sinful humanity” (169). Prager further explains these religious divides, “It is only meant to explain why to Jews it is so patently obvious that it is morally wrong to forgive a man who has burned families alive, and to Christians it is equally obvious that one ought to” (230). Buddhism also argues for forgiveness as well. Ricard states, “For a Buddhist, forgiveness is always possible and one should always forgive” (235). Lastly, there is an argument that without forgiveness it is difficult to move on to the future. Tutu succinctly states, “Without forgiveness, there is no future.”

Forgiveness, while not only Christian, is a belief and practice that almost all Christians hold. Jesus displayed forgiveness in a variety of parables such as the “Lost Son” in Luke 15 and in his life, like when he forgave his persecutors in Luke 23. If we are to aspire to live in a way like Jesus did, then forgiveness needs to be regarded as a positive step to take. Through a case story by Stacy Banerman, we can see how the absence of forgiveness leads to a cycle of violence that will continue as people seek to justify their blame. Stacy Bannerman’s tragic story about the effects of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) on her husband displays the unbearably hard aftermath of losing everything.

This study investigated the courses in which individuals created the method of remission in non-voluntary (family) associations. This article drew from the Relational Dialectics Theory (Baxter & Montgomery,) to further inspect other dialogic perspectives on absolution (e.g., Waldron and Kelley, 2008). Relational Dialectics is used to identify variations of discourse within each family relationship. This research examined the un-forgiveness issues in non-voluntary connections. The major aspects associated with the theory according to this article included voluntary and involuntary relationships. Voluntary is the ability to choose forgiveness or to cut a relationship. On the other hand, involuntary is the idea that forgiveness is an obligation.

This paper is a comprehensive evaluation of an article entitled “Forgiveness: A Perception and Motivation Study Among Married Adults.” The researchers of this study are Jose Orathinkal, Alfons Vansteenwegen, Roger Burggraeve. This paper will attempt critique and evaluate all pertinent and assigned elements within this article. DDuring this comprehensive evaluation we will disclose the strengths and weaknesses of this research, its methods, results its possible limitations and future uses. This paper will seek to disclose the viability, structure and the construction of this article as it pertains to the

The fifth theme presented in the book is forgiveness and the hostilities to forgiveness in counseling. According to McMinn (2011), forgiveness is of importance to emotional and spiritual health. However, forgiveness is perceived as a “danger” if it produces indignity or distress (McMinn, 2011).

The reading discusses two different models of forgiveness, Enright’s process model and Worthington’s REACH model. The Enright’s model has four stages that the person goes through: uncovering anger, deciding

The general topic of forgiveness has received a magnitude of attention and research on a conceptual level in recent years. Hall and Fincham consistently noted, however, that self-forgiveness had little to no empirical study or research documented and believe this is a critical piece to an individual’s overall emotional health. In an effort to stimulate additional research on the

Hall and Finchman is (2005) intent with their research was to provide self-forgiveness more recognition aside from what it has received in previous years. Their intent is for more research to be conducted on self-forgiveness in the area of literature. The authors gave the definition of what is self-forgiveness in both scientific and philosophic literature. The authors elaborate on why people do not forgive themselves initially and the reason for the lack of attention of forgiveness is mainly due to individuals not wanting to face reality. People tend to put a bandage on their problems rather than allowing their situation to take the course through the phases of denial, guilt, or shame and working through them as they progress (Hall & Fincham,

Chris Carrier’s act of forgiveness might seem unfathomable to some, an act of extreme charity or even foolishness. Indeed, our culture seems to perceive forgiveness as a sign of weakness, submission, or both. Often we find it easier to stigmatize or denigrate our enemies than to empathize with or forgive them. And in a society as competitive as ours, people may hesitate to forgive because they don’t want to relinquish the upper hand in a relationship. From Yvonne’s example we can learn that simple act like writing a note to the one she held resentment against and burning it and meditating gave relief from her chronic neck pain.

Committing mistakes may bring us to a situation where we have to forgive others as well as ourselves. The art of forgiving is something extremely significant in one’s life. It opens our mind and broadens our overall perception towards life. For example, upon causing any unnecessary fit, one should apologize and the one who was being troubled should also forgive, rather than holding a grudge. However, if the person doing the wrong deed doesn’t apologize, still one should forgive. This shows how an individual can have a broad mentality and believe in peace and harmony.