Difference Between Starbucks And Tata

Starbucks is a “premier roaster, marketer and retailer of specialty coffee” (Marketline 2012). This company is globally recognized because of their vast amount of stores, consisting of more than 17,000 retail stores in over 55 countries. Most retail stores are in highly populated areas, like “downtown and suburban centers, office buildings, university campuses and in select rural and off-highway locations” (Marketline 2012).

Starbucks is dominant coffee brand in North America, which also is well-known worldwide. Established in 1971 as coffee shop oriented to a niche of coffee purists, in late 1980’s it turned to be a constantly growing chain of stores that sold whole-beans and premium-priced coffee to mostly affluent, well-educated customers. In years 1992-2002 company was showing at least 5% annual growth. And by 2002 Starbucks was serving already 20M customers in 5886 stores (both operated and licensed) around the globe, had $3.3 billion net revenues and was opening 3 new stores a day in average.

Since Starbucks entered the coffee retail business, the company has made many trade-off business decisions. The first major trade-off was made when Howard Schultz wanted to acquire present day Starbucks from three entrepreneurs Baldwin, Siegel and Bowker. Therefore, Schultz prior to the acquisition made the trade-off to open his own coffee bar in 1986 instead of staying at Starbucks as the manager of retail sales and marketing. A bold feat, Schultz was able to replicate success and was offered to buy Starbucks for $4 million. At the time of the acquisition, many investors, including the former Starbucks owners, would not expect that the American consumer would pay a premium for coffee products. Schultz, after calculating the opportunity cost, was convinced that Starbucks would become a large coffee chain not only in the United States but internationally too. Reflecting this approach, Schultz’s trade-off worked. Starbucks, according to our book has revenue exceeding $13 billion and nearly 200,000 employees. The company has also expanded to 40 countries with 17,000 stores (Hill et al., 2015).

Starbucks is one of the leaders in coffee industry. Starbucks has entered into many new markets and today it has more than 16,000 outlets across the globe (Johnson, Scholes and Whittington 2011). Due to unlimited business opportunities, Starbucks Corp has set strategies to enter India as it is next major hub for development in near future. Previously Starbucks has gained wide success in China and Japan due to high consumption of coffee and tea. Since its inception, Starbucks has tapped the major markets across the world, India was left untapped. In India, Starbucks has setup alliances with TATA Global Beverages which is a unit of TATA Group of Companies. Starbucks along with TATA has started with an investment of $80 million and plans to open 50 coffee shops in a year. Currently few coffee shops has been setup by Starbucks, however in near future, it is expected that the company will achieve its target in capturing Indian market (Lamb2009). Thus, besides sourcing coffee beans from TATA, Starbucks can now explore more Asian markets (Hitt, Ireland and Hoskisson 2012).

Starbucks desire as the leader in the specialty coffee industry is to be acknowledged for its responsibility to coffee farmers and their families to improve their well-being. The corporation’s primary stakeholders are broad organizations such as, coffee trade associations, suppliers, and groups with interest in sustainable coffee production. Including non-profit groups focused on human rights, social justice, and environmental issues. Other stakeholders include governmental agencies such as, U. S. AID (Starbucks Corporation, 2010).

Many multinational corporations in the coffee industry have succeeded tremendously such as Starbucks. Each of these corporations has strategies that helped them continue to expand to nations of different cultures, ethnicities, governmental practices, and locations.

The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the Industry’s features and the company’s strategy. The main analysis in this project is external analysis and internal analysis. External analysis is contain of strategy group, five forces, partial SWOT, PESTEL, Industry life cycle and Internal analysis is contain of market segmentation, CSFS, partial SWOT, generic strategy, Resources and Core competency, the Boston matrix, the Ansoff matrix and financial analysis. At last the recommendation part will indicate the company’s future prospects.

2.4 Recognition and A wards Thanks to its implication, Starbucks Corp. won unique awards in different business aspects as ethical business, sustainability in business and many others. According to Starbucks its rewards and recognition, the following titles can be attributed to the company: o o o o o o -2011) 1998-2000, 2002-2012) -2012) -2012)

from a small local store to its current global enterprise. Starbucks has strategic partners all over

In 13th January 2011, a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed by Starbucks Coffee Company and Tata Coffee Limited. The main objective of Starbucks signing MoU is to entry into India market. India is a potential market where the economy is emerging and people growing to the middle class is increasing. Howard

The majority of Starbucks’ sales were made with company-operated retail stores, but also 15% of the sales were made by specialty operations such as selling coffee beans to hotels and airlines or revenues from licensing agreements. Starbucks also has a joint venture with PepsiCo and an alliance with Dreyers Grand Ice Cream with whom they introduced the Frappuchino-line. In 1995, when the US market almost reached saturation, Starbucks Coffee International was forced to concentrate on international operations.The strategy to enter a foreign market was mainly joint venture, in some markets they also used licensing as entry strategy. In 1995 the first joint venture was formed with SAZABY INC. to enter the Japanese market. More Asianpacific countries and later European countries followed. Starbucks Mission Statement: Establish Starbucks as the premier purveyor of the finest coffee in the world while maintaining our uncompromising principles while we grow. The following six guiding principles will help us measure the appropriateness of our decisions:

Starbucks have shown in the past that they are very good at taking advantage of opportunities. In an strategy alliance with Hewlett Packard, customers could create their own music CD within a Starbucks coffee shop. Thus the company could look for these kind of opportunities to seize. In addition, new markets for coffee are emerging such as India and the Pacific Rim nations, also Europe which is getting more and more accustomed with the brand name “Starbucks”. Co-branding with other manufacturers of food and drink, and brand franchising to manufacturers of other goods and services both have potential.

India, like many other Asian countries, has a tea drinking culture, but the coffee market is catching up and growing fast. This case talked about the stories of Café Coffee Day (CCD), the Indian coffee industry market leader, along with its competitor Starbucks from USA. CCD was founded in 1996 and by April 2013 it had around 3,000 stores within the Indian market. CCD had not faced any severe threat up till 2012 when Starbucks made its entry into the Indian market through a joint venture with Tata. As the world’s largest coffee chain company, Starbucks wanted to get a slice of the cake. In 2013, it opened 11 stores in Delhi and Mumbai.

This case study discusses Amalgamated Bean Coffee (ABC) Trading Company (also known as Café Coffee Day (CCD)), the market leader in the Indian coffee industry, and its competition with Starbucks, the market leader in the world’s coffee industry. This paper will first focus on the competitive advantages and challenges of CCD, then suggest a feasible strategy together with a corporate social responsibility initiative for CCD to tackle the competition with Starbucks in India.

Starbucks wanted to expand its company into India but it also needed to find a mode of entry. Functioning as a corporation with great control, available cash and a aggressive U.S. retail strategy, wasn’t going to help Starbucks in India. When exploring their options for the best mode of entry, a partnership or joint venture with a local Indian company seemed like the best fit. The joint venture would provide lots of advantages for Starbucks and the other company; both firms would share cost and risk as well as the benefits. Having a local partner would provide Starbucks with first hand knowledge of culture, political and economic issues