Difference Between Universality And Universal Human Rights

1208 Words5 Pages
Universal Human Rights mean the rights which are equally applicable and acceptable in all the societies irrespective of caste, creed, race, gender, religion etc. To give justice and treat all the people equally without making any discrimination Universal Declaration of Human Rights came in to existence. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is the unique and an important document which is translated into different languages all over world. It is based upon idea of promoting freedom, justice and peace for all the people and societies across world. It provides a set of uniform standards that were adopted by the United Nations General Assembly with the support of forty-eight countries to establish a world with justice and equality. The world is the melting pot of societies with different religions, cultures and traditions. These cultures consist of values, norms and traditions that…show more content…
So Western liberal thinking is in favor of absolute individual, political and civil rights while non-western, third world values the collective and community basis of all the rights.
Thus, these two types of values are unique and indispensable in their own cultural context. To give more clarity to this issue, the concept of universality and relatively has been explained as follows
Universality Vs. Relativity The conflict between Universal Human rights Doctrine and cultural relativism is found from the very beginning of adoption of Universal Human Right Doctrine in 1948. But this conflict takes a new turn when we talk about the human being’s security of life. Conflicting situation always endangers the human security. Before analysing this main fact, it is imperative to know that what is meant by ‘universality’ and ‘relativity’ in the concept of ‘universal human rights’ and ‘cultural relativism’.
Get Access