Differences And Similarities Between John Smith And William Bradford

The falsely labeled “New World” was a land of opportunity and hope. Europeans of all kinds flocked to this land with their own interests; some to start anew, some to become wealthy, and some to be free of tyranny. Many of these settlers documented their journey and experiences. These written accounts give us an insight unlike any other to 17th century America. John Smith and William Bradford were two men who landed in the New World around the same time. Despite this, these two men produced drastically different accounts. Bradford’s frank account appears to accurately document what occurred, whereas Smith’s exaggerated story suggests he had the intent to enthrall rather than inform.

To many Europeans in the early 17th century the Americas seemed as a new land of opportunity. John Smith and William Bradford were two of the first men who left England seeking adventure and freedom in the New World. Both groups had difficulties while trying to form their colonies and Smith and Bradford were both elected to lead. While they were both great leaders they had very different lives before their journey from England. While starting their new colonies they also took different approaches to making the land habitable. One of the most notable differences between John Smith and William Bradford was their writing style. John Smith and William Bradford were very different people in

The relationship between the English and the Native Americans in 1600 to 1700 is one of the most fluctuating and the most profound relationships in American history. On the one side of the picture, the harmony between Wampanoag and Puritans even inspires them to celebrate “first Thanksgiving”; while, by contrast, the conflicts between the Pequots and the English urge them to antagonize each other, and even wage a war. In addition, the mystery of why the European settlers, including English, become the dominant power in American world, instead of the indigenous people, or Indians, can be solved from the examination of the relationship. In a variety of ways, the relationship drastically alters how people think about and relate to the aborigines. Politically, the relationship changes to establish the supremacy of the English; the English intends to obtain the land and rules over it. Socially, the relationship changes to present the majority of the English settlers; the dominating population is mostly the English settlers. Economically, the relationship changes to obtain the benefit of the English settlers; they gain profit from the massive resource in America. Therefore, the relationship does, in fact, change to foreshadow the discordance of the two groups of people.

1. How do you interpret Smith’s (the author’s) attitude toward Indians? What passages can you cite (quote) to defend your point of view? (1 points)

Both William Penn and John Smith attempted to convince people that they should come to the new world. William Penn recognizes that people with skills should go to the colonies because the colonies can offer them more opportunity for their trade, whereas Smith tries to use imagery to convince everyone that they should go to the new world. This distinction is due to the fact that Penn and Smith were writing in different time periods. William Penn, writing in 1681, said that “Those that go into a foreign plantation, their industry is worth more there than if they stayed at home…” (William 74).

Captain John Smith and William Bradford are different in their view of the Native Americans. When comparing John Smith and William Bradford's work they wrote with different styles, due to differing audiences and purposes. Smith wrote things based on all the action, promoting himself in a third person “tall tale,” in order to establish a higher government position and bring more hard-working Englishmen to the New World. Using detail and supposed thoughts. John Smith’s work can nearly be titled as a novel and has been passed down through newer versions, such as Disney’s “Pocahontas” or “Avatar.” To compare, William Bradford’s work it probably will never turn into a movie, as it is more factual and serves as a rather boring account of the

“The Indian presence precipitated the formation of an American identity” (Axtell 992). Ostracized by numerous citizens of the United States today, this quote epitomizes Axtell’s beliefs of the Indians contributing to our society. Unfortunately, Native Americans’ roles in history are often categorized as insignificant or trivial, when in actuality the Indians contributed greatly to Colonial America, in ways the ordinary person would have never deliberated. James Axtell discusses these ways, as well as what Colonial America may have looked like without the Indians’ presence. Throughout his article, his thesis stands clear by his persistence of alteration the Native Americans had on our nation. James Axtell’s bias delightfully enhances his thesis, he provides a copious amount of evidence establishing how Native Americans contributed critically to the Colonial culture, and he considers America as exceptional – largely due to the Native Americans.

In the early 1509’s-1850’s there were two Englishmen named John Smith and William Bradford that established in the colonies of British who came to the New World to share a common culture. These two men wrote journals,talking about what had happened to them in the past months and what they went through. Although they struggled and faced many challenges they did their best in order for them to survive for example, they had starvation times and although they would starve he would do his best. Bradford and Smith presented different accounts of the life on land and talked about an ideal vision of what the new land could be with the best of people colonizing the new land.Both wrote of their experience in America, were Europeans, and desired to settle the land. However, the similarities end there-while Smith roamed Virginia as a scout and a military man, Bradford planted his church community in Plymouth.

Captain John Smith’s crew and William Bradford’s crew both originate from England and once had the same beliefs, customs, religion, and government, until environmental factors, beliefs, and location distinguished them. Both John Smith and William Bradford suffered great disasters ,however they both faced them with different attitudes.

Christopher Columbus, upon his voyage to Asia, discovered the New World in 1492 by misadventure. In the New World, there was a continent labeled North America. It was not until a hundred years later that America’s first colonies arose. One colony was Jamestown, Virginia, and the other colony was Plymouth, Massachusetts. With these colonies, there came very cultivated dignitaries from England. The leader of Jamestown was John Smith, and the leader of Plymouth was William Bradford. Both leaders were simultaneously leading their colonies at around the same time frame. The men had the dexterity to lead a colony, yet they both had preeminent ideologies. Their deviating mindsets worked to their own advantage, although

For hundreds of years, Native Americans have been persecuted by outsiders who invaded their lives and territories and subsequently robbed them of their lives. Through various readings from Tecumseh, Benjamin Franklin, and Andrew Jackson one can see how perception greatly affects interactions between Native Americans, interactions between whites, and interactions between Native Americans and whites. It is interesting to see how these different writers perceive issues of unity and civility.

Captain John Smith and William Bradford were both american settlers that came from England. Both John Smith and William Bradford were looking for a better life in the New World yet with many different ideas and beliefs. For example Jamestown came for business and trade purposes and the Plymouth Colony came for religious reasons. Jamestown was founded in 1607 and was lead by captain John Smith.(Smith pg.73) The Plymouth Plantations were founded in 1620 and was lead by William Bradford.(Bradford pg. 5)

In the late 1500s, John Smith, 1580, and William Bradford, 1590, were both born in England where later on in life they would become something better. John Smith left his house at the age of 16 where he would then fight for the Dutch against Spain and in 1602, he was captured into being a slave, but soon after escaped and returned back to England (Smith). William Bradford joins the Scrooby Separatist in 1609 and later, in 1613, marries a woman named Dorothy May (Bradford).

When John Smith before become an explorer and a leader of Jamestown, on early life of smith, he only lived by himself after when smith’s father died and then he learned how to be independent men. Afterwards, he joined as a seaman and became a military. At becoming as a military when he get to europe along with the englishmen; they fought with dutch over the spaniards. In Late 1600 Smith troop through on central Europe to take action with habsburg against the Turks consequently he won a triple dual against highest one than to commander, but suddenly smith were been

I found their two accounts of coming to the new world were just as much similar as they were different. Both men wrote about their experiences, however their approach greatly differed in dealing with the natives, settling the land, and convincing their fellow Europeans to make the voyage to the new world. Smith wanted to control the native people and their land, setting himself up for success in the new world. Bradford was more inclined to work with the natives and respect the nature of their ways. His intentions were not self-motivated, but rather served as an outwardly expression of his faith.