Differences Between Carthage And Rome

After 650 b.c., they expanded into north-central Italy and came to control Rome and most of Latium. The Etruscans found Rome a village but launched a building program that turned it into a city. The Romans borrowed ideas from the Etruscans, such as Etruscan dress—the toga and short cloak. The Roman army also borrowed its organization from the Etruscans. After their conquest of Italy, the Romans found themselves face to face with a strong power in the Mediterranean—the state of Carthage. The Phoenicians had founded Carthage around 800 b.c. on the coast of North Africa. By the third century b.c., Carthage had an enormous trading empire in the western Mediterranean, including the coast of northern Africa, southern Spain, Sardinia, Corsica, and western Sicily. With its control of western Mediterranean trade, Carthage was the largest and richest state in the

I feel There are a variety of vocal points when bringing up similarities and differences between Greece and Rome. The two vocal points I feel strongly about are both their military and leadership. When talking about their militaries we have two of the strongest forces to ever grace the earth. When talking about their respective cultures we are talking about beliefs that spread nationwide. These are the similarities and differences between Greece and Rome.

Trade is extremely important to any civilization that intends on growing and prospering. There were basically two different kinds of trade routes. The sea routes which incorporated shipping items over water and the land routes where they carted items back and forth, both of which provided items and money into the economy of Rome. Such items as grains, cereals, papyrus, and silk were traded. Control and the efficient use of these trades routes certainly helps a developing nation, but is it the main factor in why Rome grew so fast?

Rome and Carthage shared many aspects when the two first clash. Carthage had two chief magistrates referred to as Suffetes, which compared to the political power of the Roman consuls, a council of elders named the “hundred,” which was similar to the Roman senate, and there was a Carthaginian assembly, the consistency resembled the Roman comitia (Morey, 1901). This is where the similarities end for Carthaginian, ruled by a few wealthy families, the Carthaginians did not integrate their subjects into the state, and they did not have the great loyalty of its citizens that Rome enjoyed. By placing its army under the command of a single permanent leader, Carthage created an overwhelming advantage to Rome, which had its armies controlled by the ever-changing civil magistrates and consuls (Morey, 1901).

Both time periods have differences, but they also have similarities that tie the two together. Both Roman time periods had land extending from Spain to present day Turkey. Over time they both gained and lost territory during their time of rule, but the core land mass obtained from them was the same. The capital for both groups was Rome, Italy. This was the halfway point of the land. So, when the leaders were needed, they could travel in a short matter of time. Both time periods also spoke the same language which was Koine and Latin. Koine was the original language that most knew how to speak and slowly Latin was brought into both. They also shared the same resources, which is because both lived in the same location. They were known to export several types of metals and wheat (View Article: Imperial Rome vs. Roman Republic).

In the early 3rd century B.C., Rome and Carthage were expanding their empires and met at the city of Sicily. At the time the Roman military consisted of well regulated infantry and cavalry, but hardly any naval forces ready for combat. The Carthaginian military was the opposite.

All in a word, a more disciplined army and a stronger sense of honor and belongings of Romans made them competitive and advantageous than the Carthaginians so that the Romans can build a powerful empire in the core area of Europe that almost contains the whole Mediterranean.

Both civilizations had very strong central governments which allowed for powerful and expanding kingdoms. Both empires had to develop road systems for their expanding military. The Roman army men were experienced and privileged and held high ranks in their class system and played an important role,

While many Roman and Carthaginian leaders sometimes tried to simulate different strategies from their opponents leaders. There were many differences between the two powerful governments of Rome and Carthage. One such area that had differences is the way they there governments functioned.

Over the course of one-hundred years the Mediterranean antiquity was rocked by an ancient cold war between the North African seafaring state of Carthage, and the newly rising city of Rome located on the Italian Peninsula. In the course of two major wars and one extended three year long siege of Carthage itself Rome would conquer its last major foe and turn the Mediterranean into a Roman lake.

Augustus cared alot about details and made sure he was to be remembered for his great actions. Everything he worked for was handled with dignity and firmness, he said himself that he hoped to be "called the author of the best possible government." He stabilized the boundaries of the empire, provided for the protection on the frontiers, reorganized the size of the army, and created two fleets to form a Roman navy! He made sure this was all administered to a vast empire. He undertook the repair of all 82 temples in Rome and built many new ones. As I already mentioned, he reconstructed the Forum and it was later completed in 40 years. Something he was also quoted saying was, "I found Rome in clay and leave it to you in marble." He didn't only

While very similar in structure, both governments had a myriad of differences. For the most ovios there government. The Roman government used a modified version of the democracy they called it representative government. While Carthage was considered to be a republican government. Unlike the Romans, they didn't incorporate the conquered people into their governments structure, so they did not have the support Rome.

I believe that there were probably more similarities between the governments of Rome and Carthage than differences. Both functioned as a republic. Carthage had suffetes, or magistrates. These suffetes were comparable to the consuls of Rome. The suffetes and consuls were position held by two men for a period of one year.

Rome and Carthage were the preeminent cities in the western Mediterranean governed by two different models. Rome was a Republic, founded in 509 BCE, and was a land power, building her strength on the mighty legions after having consolidated the other Italian city-states under her hegemony. Cartage was founded in 750 BCE, and it was a Phoenician colony that had a significant power by eventual expansion, although this strength rested on the skill of the Carthaginian fleets. Carthage was a maritime power, expanding power through trade and commerce. Rome was a form of government that had intellectual descendant from the Greeks' experiments in democracy.

Carthage was a Phoenician island founded 50 years before Rome. The fact it was founded before Rome, was one of their many advantages/strengths over Rome. Some other advantages were that they had Hannibal (247 BCE - 182 BCE), the Carthaginian general who was one of the greatest military leaders in history and helped them a lot in the Punic Wars. Another military advantage is that Carthage had a good navy. The Romans, were in a position to outfight the Carthaginians, although the Romans were not in a position to out-sail the Carthaginians, due to their good navy.