Differences Between Google Chrome and Internet Explorer Essay

Efficiency – Internet is a resourceful engine that can gather information for research. Search engines have exceedingly amount of Information that is free and accessible to anyone. People can assess search engine through different types of platform

Observe: What are some of the significant differences Carr identifies between reading books and reading online?

The war between Microsoft and the Department of Justice actually began with the rollout of Windows 95. In an attempt to gain a greater market share of the Internet browser arena, Microsoft began packaging Internet Explorer as part of their Windows operating system. Microsoft required their original equipment manufacturing (OEM) companies to install Microsoft Internet Explorer and Microsoft Networking software on every personal computer they sold along with icons for each application prominently displayed on the user's desktop.

According to the Week 2 Case Study, my company uses Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Chrome as it primary browser. I am charged with setting a policy on how to secure these browsers as much as possible.

To start, I use Google pretty regularly as anyone would if they have access to technology like in today’s society. I personally use Google whenever I need an address for a certain store or a phone number for said store. No one uses phonebooks anymore, when I can just easily type the name in the browser and have accurate results show up in seconds. I also use Google for directions or news updates. Google is extremely helpful because most people live their lives through their phones and Google is right there when you have literally any question and it will be answered in just a few seconds. Other benefits from Google are that the most relevant sites are shown when you look something up. This is very important because if you are looking something up and something else totally irrelevant comes up it is very confusing. Not only that but, Google is ad-free and for someone who is on the Web a lot, ads are extremely annoying and a waste of time. Finally, Google has about one trillion sites indexed as well which is pretty amazing.

If this is you, most likely your information technology team will tell you they have browser specific intranet web technologies used by a large population within your company that will no longer work correctly if not opened in IE8. This is IT jargon for, “I’m in the middle of my sandwich.” Don’t believe it. In the vast majority of cases, applications built to run on web browsers will function on any modern browser, with one exception: the styling. And by styling, we’re talking about things like background image handling, rounded corners, drop shadows, and color gradient support.

competitive edge by tying their browser into the OS, however there are much better browsers

2. How to use electronic mail software such as Microsoft Outlook or a web browser such as Google Chrome. From the browser, I will be able to access our online Microsoft Exchange web app.

Secondly, Windows-based systems are far more superior in quantity in respect to the software. There is much more than just software, and most of it is superior quality. Significant software is often released for both systems, but it is generally released for Windows operating systems earlier. For example, Internet Explorer 5, Microsoft’s most recent web navigation tool was released for Windows on June 10, 1999; until later Apple released a version for Macintosh has not been released as of November 14,1999.

Netscape's assent would have ensured that, for the foreseeable future, Microsoft would produce the only platform-level browsing software distributed to run on Windows, Internet Explorer. This would have eliminated the prospect that non-Microsoft browsing software could weaken the applications barrier to entry. Executives at Microsoft received confirmation in early May 1995 that Netscape was developing a version of Navigator to run on Windows 95, which was due to be released in a couple of months. Microsoft's senior executives understood that if they could prevent this version of Navigator from presenting alternatives, the technologies branded as Navigator would cease to present an alternative platform to developers. Even if non-Windows versions of Navigator exposed Internet-related Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), applications written to those APIs would not run on the platform Microsoft executives expected to enjoy the largest installed base, i.e., Windows 95. So, as long as the version of Navigator written for Windows 95 relied on Microsoft's Internet-related APIs instead of exposing its own, developing for Navigator would not mean developing cross-platform. Developers of network-centric applications thus would not be drawn to Navigator's APIs in

First, Microsoft ‘encouraged’ Compaq, Apple, and other computer manufacturers to promote only Internet Explorer, and to make that the default browser on their PC. This encouragement came in the way of threats to eliminate or delay licensing of operating systems, providing the browser for free to internet access providers, and bundling the software with the operating system under the guise of interactive ease for the consumer. This manipulation led to an increase in the browser’s sales by 45 to 50%, which paralleled the decline Netscape experienced in their market sales in 1998.6

2. Slow: Windows requires a lot of computer resources (memory, processor, disk space), and thus, runs slower.

In return, these companies must give preferential treatment in promotion and the like to Microsoft. One example is AOL's new 4.0 browser is specially designed to work best with the Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 browser. Much of the increase in AOL's clientele base can be attributed to the combined efforts of Microsoft and AOL. Microsoft is not only working with ISP's, but also with companies that build and maintain web pages and servers.

The website is well organized, making it very simple to find what a person is looking for. Unlike Microsoft, it is well spaced, which helps to grab the reader’s attention. Microsoft’s homepage is setup fairly differently from Apple’s. Instead of having a main ad like Apple, its site has a set of highlights advertising their information. Highlights do not catch a reader’s attention as well as Apple’s large ad. Furthermore, Microsoft’s homepage is also packed with a lot of information in such little space. The information is broken down into bullet points, but the font is small and there are hardly any images to differentiate between the items. There is little to attract the reader to make him/her want to read through this content because it just appears to be boring. Therefore, the homepage of Apple and Microsoft differ.

First, MS tied IE to Windows 95 and potentially its successors. As MS's Christian Wildfeuer wrote in 1997, “[It would] be very hard to increase browser share on the merits of IE 4 alone. It will be