Differences Between Stop And Terry Stop

829 Words4 Pages
When it comes to stop-and-frisk and Terry Stop, can be both good thing and bad thing for our country. The good is if officer take there time and observe we can help prevent a lot of crime. On the downside, these officers mostly target African American and Hispanic males. Stop-and- frisk takes place when an officer feels it’s some type of suspicion about a citizen, they then stop you and frisk if they feel is necessary. But not all of those stop and frisk are good, the statistics in New York show that 9 out of10 stop-and-frisk are innocent. So what does this tell you? That maybe as officers we should try a different method or a different type of citizen to stop-and-frisk. The Terry Stop, however, is a bit different. Terry Stop came from a case that took place in 1968 in Ohio; about a man who was stopped by an officer who felt Mr. Terry was behaving suspiciously with two other friends. After reading and learning about the Terry vs. Ohio case I…show more content…
As a result, a Terry stop may be challenged as unlawful when as suspect is treated as if he or she is being subjected to probable cause arrest rather than to a reasonable suspicion stop. The Fourth Amendment gives that "the privilege of the general population to be secure in their people, houses, papers, and impacts, against irrational pursuits and seizures, should not be disregarded. This boundless right of 9*9 individual security has a place as much with the native in the city of our urban areas with regards to the property holder closeted in his examination to discard his mystery issues (Terry vs. Ohio). There are three main focuses when dealing with Terry stop: movement, length of detention, and intrusiveness. Terry stop is also a good and bad way to decrease the crime, but it’s mostly just the approach and how aggressive officers, detectives, and sheriffs are when drawing closer to the citizen to
Get Access