preview

Differences Between The Crucible Movie And Movie

Decent Essays

The Crucible was written in 1952 by Arthur Miller, who wrote this to write a drama reflecting the mass cultural and political hysteria produced when the U.S. government sought to suppress Communism and radical leftist activity in America(Arthur). I believe that the film version is better historically than the writing because it shows more of the bigger reasoning of the witch trials. In the film you can see what kind of a person John Proctor is and his outlook on the witch trials and his own morals. It shows a better understanding of all the characters as a whole, but still finds way to compare it straight back to the writing. If one would want to know more about the salem witch trials, the film would be more suggested than the written play. John Proctor's character is portrayed better in the movie historically because you can really tell what kind of person, and moral values he has by the way he carries himself and voices his opinion. John Proctor was a farmer in his middle thirties who was accused of, and did cheat on his wife with Abigail Williams, which is what got him into all of the mess about witchcraft going around salem. I believe that John Proctor was better portrayed in the movie because you could hear his tone and see facial expression which got the point across with more of an understanding of the point Proctor is trying to get across (The Crucible). Also, in the movie, Proctor and Abigail meet and as they are talking, Abigail physically gropes

Get Access