Different Forms Of Democracy : One Is Not Better Than The Other

The idea of democracy is the power of the people that they have democratic rights such as the doctrine of democracy and the freedom of expression. In a complete democratic society, everyone is born equal. People not only have power in democracy but also have a responsibility to the society. In addition, democracy relates with Constitutions and election. There are a lot of democracy societies except the United States. As a democratic country, the United States and Canada have similar political and rules, but still have differences.

There are two types of democracies, direct democracy and representative democracy. As one would expect, the two are very similar. Direct democracy and representative democracy are both systems of government in which power lies with the people whom are govern though the power of voting. The power of voting is how both systems emphasis the importance of people’s rights. There is also a common sense of self-empowerment to the people being govern in both types of government due to this right. Furthermore, there is a mutual prominence towards majority rule in the two systems.

It’s that time of year again where you are voting for your choice of government, what will you choose? Monarchy. Oligarchy. Tyranny. Democracy. They were all different forms of government back in Greece, every form of government had the goods and the bads. Every city had their own laws, army, and money, but by far their government was the most important. That’s why we the ancient Greek cities are called city-states. Democracy and Oligarchy are two of the four governments, they both have the goods and bads, but which is really the best?

If asked what democracy is, many would claim that it is a “government by the

Some long standing societies have failed to become democratic, even with popular support for such a political system for many different reasons. One, tradition and change is hard. Some states have such a thick religious, cultural, etc. history that they do not know how to incorporate democracy with what their state has, needs and wants. Two, they do not want a democracy. They want to be different and try something new to become better or even equal to the presence that the United States used to play as the main actor of politics worldwide. They see the United States diminishing in ways that it does not wish to, so it does not go with the democracy route. Three, some leaders may find that fear works better than anything else. Isolating people

Somaliland became independent in 1991. It is the best democratic track record comparing to its neighboring countries (Kaplan 2008). Somaliland is not internationally recognized as a separate country, but it has the most democratic political system in the entire Horn of Africa (Kaplan 2008). Somaliland has carried out elections in the past and still carries out for the control of its government. Elections held in the past have been pretty fair and the power transferred from one political party to another was done in a peaceful manner. Somaliland since its constitutional referendum in 2001 held three consecutive competitive elections (Kaplan 2008). What makes Somaliland different from Somalia is that it has traditional institutions of self-governance which form into a unique form of democracy (Kaplan 2008). Somaliland has had a change of governments in the past and the powers from one party to another was usually done in a peaceful manner. The citizens there have a right to vote and have their own opinions about electing or choosing the leader they want for their country. Somaliland's print media are free to criticize the government (Kaplan 2008). They are not threatened or receive punishments from any political party in power. They have freedom of choice. In the past for promoting fair elections, Somaliland has used indelible ink on voter's fingers to prevent double voting (Kaplan 2008). All the votes are counted and supervised by representatives of all the parties (Kaplan 2008). Being a democracy, it is crucial for the governing party to take other parties opinions into consideration. The president of Somaliland who was elected in 1993 Mohamed Haji Ibrahim Egal negotiated with other sub-clans (Kaplan 2008). They rebuild government buildings, reopened central bank with a new currency, formed a new civil service and etc (Kaplan 2008). Somaliland's bottom-up

Is there not benefits to both absolutism and democracy? A ruler leads with a firm hand to keep their citizens under its power. A ruler’s duty is to protect the citizens right and freedoms. Absolutism is the political doctrine and practice of unlimited, centralized, authority and absolute sovereignty, is vested especially in a monarchy or dictatorship. A monarch’s authority to govern should be limited by the people, because natural rights need to be protected, citizens need to be allowed to speak freely, and the law should promote equality.

2. Somalia has a fractured political past. There has been little stability in the country since it gained independence from Great Britain in 1960.1 However, in 2011, an internationally backed organization took over Somalia’s capital, Mogadishu. Now called the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS), they ratified a constitution and held the nation’s first ever presidential election in 2012.1 This new government has made strides in stabilizing Mogadishu, but much of the nation is still divided. Two major regions, Somaliland and Puntland, have their own independent governments and consider themselves self-autonomous.1 Also, the FGS isn’t flawless. A second

Originally Somalia was on the road to a democratic government; the Somali people ratified a new constitution on July 20, 1961 and elected Aden Abdullah Osman Daar as president and Abdirashid Ali Shermarke as prime minister (“Italian Somaliland” 3). However, the British government failed to prepare the Somalis for independence. As a result, Somalia, though its goals were to unite and form a stable democratic government, has only cycled through corruption, from the autocracy of Siad Barre to Farrah Aydid’s corrupt rule in 1991, a government so destructive it was followed by anarchy (“Somalia Post-Independence” 1-3). Had European imperial powers not interfered in Somalia’s development, it might not have begun moving in the direction of a modern democracy but it would have remained functional and peaceful as an Arab sultanate. But since imperial powers did interfere, Somalia was not prepared to stand on its own when given independence, and as a result is in a volatile position and is widely regarded as a “failed state” according to the Economist (“Poll” 1). The turbulence in Somalia’s government that followed the period of imperial rule would not have occurred had Britain and Italy never interfered in the first place, thus showing that imperialism leads to governmental instability.

Democracy is a political system in which the power belongs to the people by which majority rules. The source indicates that freedom of choice is an essential component to a liberal democracy as it gives the power to the people by having multiple political ideologies to choose from and elect as their government. When there is competition between multiple parties, each party has a critical opposition that can hold each party accountable and restrict their power within government. This gives the power to the people because it allows people to choose from multiple political ideologies. Without competition, a party can form an oligarchy; by which one group rules over a country. Without a critical opposition, no one can criticize the party's

Winston Churchill once remarked that “democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried”. In agreement with his statement, this paper will examine the problems of democratic governments using specific examples, and compare it to the failure of fascist governments in Nazi Germany and Italy and communist governments in the Soviet Union and China.

Democracy is not just the same over and over. It is constantly evolving and constantly changing. Democracy has been influence by the social, economic, and political changes throughout history. It was changed by our many different political leaders. Whether they’re democratic or republican. Sometimes the changes were positive and sometimes they were negative. We made progress as a country, very slowly, but progress nonetheless.

Throughout the years, democratic traditions have grown. Specifically during the enlightenment era, the so called “ age of reason”, some brainy individuals started looking at how governance is organized, then they examined the standards by which they were governed.

Throughout history different types of instrumental regimes have been in tact so civilizations remained structured and cohesive. As humanity advanced, governments obligingly followed. Although there have been hiccups from the ancient times to modern day, one type of government, democracy, has proven to be the most effective and adaptive. As quoted by Winston Churchill, democracy is the best form of government that has existed. This is true because the heart of democracy is reliant, dependent, and thrives on the populaces desires; which gives them the ability for maintaining the right to choose, over time it adjusts and fixes itself to engulf the prominent troubling issues, and people have the right of electing the person they

Churchill’s claim that “democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried” is deliberately provocative and intended to challenge the reader’s simplistic ideal that democracy is without faults. There are an estimated 114 democracies in the world today (Wong, Oct 3rd lecture). A figure that has increased rapidly in the last century not necessarily because democracy is the best form of government, but primarily for reason that in practice, under stable social, economic and political conditions, it has the least limitations in comparison to other forms of government. Be it the transparency of a democratic government or the prevalence of majority rule, all subdivisions of democracy benefit and hinder its