Different Models Of Diagnosis And Treatment

Patient-centered interviewing is a form of interview that prioritizes the concerns and interests of the patient by providing a solid platform for the patients to communicate their needs, which are then integrated into the overall care plan (Hardy, 2016). There is a growing evidence that suggests that physicians who focus on the patient as well as the disease are able to obtain historical data that is more accurate, increase patient satisfaction and adherence, and enhance the relationship between the patient and the physician (Medical Writings, 2001).

A biopsychosocial model is a deep interrelation of all of this three-factor such as biological factors(genetic and physical history), psychological factors (cognition, will, and emotions), and social factors (socioeconomic status, culture, religion, and technology). When a combination of all of this three-factor working together, it will lead to an outcome of an illness, however, each of this factors on its own is very insufficient to lead to an

The biopsychosocial model (BPS) of health is a framework developed by George L. Engle. This approach postulates that health and illness are influenced by biological, psychological and social factors. These factors are all involved in the causes, manifestation, course and consequence of health and diseases. The biopsychosocial model was introduced as an alternative approach to the biomedical model which is a more narrow approach (Abraham, 2008). The biomedical model states that diseases can only be

The biomedical model of health fails to comprise factors such social or environment that relate or associate with illness and also it views very little about the individual`s wellbeing history such as medical history or feelings. Holistically, a person`s well-being doesn’t not depend on physically states only and the biomedical model of health believe that a person is ill or has broken (leg or arm), they can be fixed which would lead to health restoration along with that, this model doesn’t consider that the person have or will be in pain and that pain can lead to many. Through this model, there are high chances of diagnosing wrong illnesses. For example: an individual might repine about back pain and then with biomedical model method (tests), the back might appear ok, but the history of something such insomnia, depression or others would not be viewed.

Models of illness are used to analyse how illness arises and to predict what treatment might be effective.; Most models are implicit and not formally described.In the context of health and illness, a model will specify what factors are of importance in determining whether a person is ill, (and conversely, by implication, what factors are not relevant). It will also specify the nature of the interrelationships between these factors and being ill

On this week I read and learn about the biomedical model, a model that regards the illness as it is, it doesn't take into account the role of social factors or individual subjectivity. Do not matter why people are sick or how they got sick, the biomedical model focuses only on factors purely biological and says that people are not responsible for their illness, and the physicians are responsible for the treatment.

This is an analysis of a taped interview between a nurse and a patient who is taking pre-employment medicals. The information given during the interview, including her name, Pink Cloud is fictitious because of the need of confidentiality. During the interview, objective and subjective data will be collected. The areas of communication focused on in the analysis are verbal, questioning and listening skills. Analysis will be made and later suggestions and recommendations will be made on how to make improvements in the future. To achieve this, direct quotations from the will be used to make references to the three theories being analysed and will be supported by the literature.

Scientifically and clinically, biomedical model has been proved to be of great assistance. Biomedical model of health determines the illnesses through shown symptoms (Wade and Halligan, 2004). Diseases and symptoms are the signs that there is something wrong within human body in terms of functions and structures. However, this model has its drawbacks. According to Engel (1977), the medicine major flaw was that it defined ‘disease’ using somatic parameters.

The biopsychosocial model aims to explain an individual’s health as a culmination of his unique biological factors (comprising of genetics, temperament and biochemicals), psychological factors (such as mood, affect, personality, etc.) and social factors (cultural background, society within which one operates, familial factors, social interactions, etc.). Distorted biological factors such as composition of neurochemicals in the brain or abnormality in any other bio physiological processes can lead to ill health and diseases occurring in the body. Psychological factors such as clinical symptoms, psychopathology or even perpetual distress and negative thinking could lead to release in cortisol in the body. This is also known as the stress hormone

For many years the biomedical approach has been the gold standard in healthcare, but this approach lacks many important factors. While the biomedical approach takes into consideration the biologic aspect of a disease, it fails to address the importance of psychological and social factors when treating a patient. This paper compares the biomedical approach to the biopsychosocial model in healthcare, specifically in regards to diabetes. This article provides information concerning biological, psychological and social factors and their importance when treating a

The biopsychosocial model was developed by George Engel in 1977, this model emphasizes on the complex relationship between the biology, psychology and sociology factor which play a significant role in human development, illness and care delivery (Ogden, 2012)

Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2017). Clinical interviewing (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &

After knocked and entered the room, I felt so nervous when I see the patient. I commenced the interview by asking Mrs. X about the specific nature of her visit. This was an open question; therefore immediately increase the extent of patient involvement in the development of the conversation. Then, I moved on the 7 basic questions about her symptom, which is her cough. I think I did OK

The patient-physician dialogue is not finished after discussing the diagnosis, tests, and treatments. For the patient, this is just a beginning; the news is sinking in. The physician should anticipate a shift in the patient's sense of self, which should be handled as an important part of the meet—not as an unpleasant plot twist to a physician's preferred story line.

Sullivan (1954) supported that clinical interviews are generally the first interaction between the patient and clinician anda re use to find out who the patient is, why they are here and what they come through to be in their present or existing situation. The basic advantage of the clinical interview is that interviewer can transcribe the questions as needful, illuminate doubt and supply that the answers are appropriately understood, by repeating and rephrasing the questions. The interviewer can also collect non-verbal cues from the client or respondent. Any disturbance, stress, worry and troubles that the client experiences can be defined through, frowns (not the tolerant), body language and nervous taping, unawares displayed by any person. This would be unlikely to specify in a telephone meeting or interview. So face to face aids the interviewee to get the wanted outcomes and aid them the phrase of the person to whom they are interviewing. By understanding the facial expression of the client the interviewer can certainly and easily grasp what the client wish to say them about any thing. The basic disadvantage of the clinical interview is that face to face communication between clinician and client is the geographically limitations they may lay on the surveys and the numerous resources necessary if such surveys required to be made internationally and nationally. The expense of training interviews to minituarize