Different Strokes For Different Folks? Parenting Styles And Child Outcome

1787 WordsMay 2, 20168 Pages
Different Strokes for Different Folks? Parenting Styles and Child Outcome Monique Ocanas Governors State University Different Strokes for Different Folks? Parenting Styles and Child Outcome Much emphasis has been placed in the field of child development and the role that early providers possess when it comes to the needs of children at the early stages of life. Whether conceptualizing socialization and priming with Locke’s “tabula rosa/blank slate” or Rousseau’s “preassembled moral schema” approach to child development, this “window of opportunity” is both fleeting and permanent. Every interaction molds the individual into the person they are to become, and the bond that the dependent child forms with the caregiver is a precedent to the numerous relationships and attachments they will create as an adult. Granted that the provider/nurturer fulfills the needs of attachment and attentiveness for the offspring, this will determine the success of progressing through child developmental stages, and leads to a higher propensity of social adaptiveness. Inversely, if the aforementioned things are absent in a child’s early years, detrimental effects could occur, including stints in physical, social, and mental development. This is dependent upon the severity and duration of neglect, and has been seen in clinical cases that appears as psychological phenomena to both the general public, and researchers alike. Taking into account all of these factors, great interest has

More about Different Strokes For Different Folks? Parenting Styles And Child Outcome

Open Document