Essay about Different Types of Research

A deductive argument is an argument that is intended by the user to be valid and to guarantee the truth of the conclusion given that premises are true. An inductive argument is an argument that is intended by the user to be strong or good enough that, if the premises were to be true, then it would be unlikely that the conclusion itself is false. An example of a deductive argument would be; Socrates was a man. All men are mortal. Therefore, Socrates was mortal. An example of an inductive argument would be; Socrates was Greek. Most Greeks ate fish. Socrates at fish.

On the other hand, President Obama relied on both inductive and deductive reasoning types (Evans, 2012). Using inductive reasoning, President Obama was able to identify the key issues such as his purpose in improving alliances with countries across world and justified the ideas into a conclusion.

Inductive reasoning stands for the arguments that do not preserve the truth, unlike the deductive reasoning. There is no guarantee in inductive reasoning even if the premises are true that the conclusion will be true. The premises bring forth the probability most in life situations. In inductive reasoning, the premises are described to be weak, implausible or cogent, and they form the basis for the drawn conclusion as the evidence available determines whether the argument is strong or weak.

3) Deductive Reasoning- Reasoning in which ideas are at the beginning and proof follows. Essays, textual commentary, and loose sentences are deductive.

The next step in the scientific method could be to take the data founded to create a conclusion.

22.  A ________________ is a fundamental form of reasoning where one proposition is inferred from two others.

First, deductive reasoning is “a truth-guaranteeing type of reasoning, meaning that if the premises of a deductive argument are correct, then the conclusion must inescapably

3. Based on assumptions- Basing our reasoning on assumptions is taking for granted our thoughts on what is true to come to a conclusion about an issue. Many times what we think is the truth is not, however, more often then not we will move on in our reasoning believing that we are correct and whatever we see as truth is the accurate assumption.

Arguments of philosophical or theological genre, to be effective, require evidence; depending on the type of argument, this ‘evidence’ differs in meaning: A deductive argument is based on reason and suggests that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true, for example:

Inductive reasoning is a probabilistic reasoning in which the main claim concerns the improbability of the conclusion being false given the premises being true. Premises of an inductive argument do not entail the conclusion.

Research approach – A deductive approach will be adopted to thus study in comparison to (Morgan spurlock) A deductive approach is where the concern of a hypothesis based on existing theory and then designing a new strategy (Wilson,2010), (Saunders etal,2007). This approach establishes a relationship between the theory and the results and logical reasoning is developed (Bryman & Bell, 2007).the data findings would be compared against existing literature view; I will compare this to (Morgan, Spurlock).

We need axioms and definitions in order to structure an argument that points to certainty; each theorem must be solidly grounded on the other. Axioms are solidly grounded on experience. They are the most universal class and the most reliable. The so-called Deductive Sciences are therefore also inductive science in that whilst they rest on pure and empirical experience, they are suppositions from these bases and only hypothetical. They are approximate to the truth but lack the same certainty. This theory however must be tested in order to see whether it is categorically applicable to all sickness including those based on numbers such s Calculus; Arithmetic and Algebra.

3. Based on assumptions- Basing our reasoning on assumptions is taking for granted our thoughts on what is true to come to a conclusion about an issue. Many times what we think is the truth is not, however, more often than not we will move on in our reasoning believing that we are correct and whatever we see as truth is the accurate assumption.

In effect this is the process of determining what evidence must be collected to test the major hypotheses or answer the questions.

What is inductive reasoning? Inductive reasoning is a thought process in which an observation of multiple facts that are found to be true are combined to form a generalized conclusion. A conclusion that may be definite or contrary, depending on the point of view of the observer. For example, in this statement: "The chair in the living room is red. The chair in the dining room is red. The chair in the bedroom is red. All chairs in the house are red." The observer observes a general pattern that the chairs in the living room, bedroom and dining room are red. Therefore, concludes that all the chairs in the house are red. The premise in this statement provided evidence for the truth of the conclusion. However, such conclusion can be challenged.