Dignity And Question Of Doubt In The Book Of Mormon

The words “certainty” and “doubt” have many varying connotations and implications given a specific context. Even though the definitions of these two words are considered polar opposites of each other, there is one connection between the two that is undeniable: both certainty and doubt can be taken with a grain of salt, as they are all merely just opinions specific to the person that those concepts are presented to. Adding on to that, there is also a concept relating to this; the idea that there is always “the certainty of doubt” and that they are merely two sides of the same coin.

The Mormon religion first came to light in the early 1800s, in the northeastern United States. The Second Great Awakening provided the perfect religious atmosphere for new religious dogma. Furthermore, this new religion offered fresh perspective and ideals; which helped to further alienate its followers from mainstream gospel. Faced with extreme prejudice from Protestants, it wasn 't until the Mormons fled west that their religious prerogative flourished. The hyper-emotional state of affairs originating from the Second Great Awakening resulted in religious turbulence which served as the foundation for Mormonism whose continued development and survival directly correlated to westward expansion and the freedoms of the West.

Growing up in an all LDS member family, the Book of Mormon has been apart of my life for as long as I can remember. Between personal study, reading it together as a family, sharing it with my friends, and pondering its message, there is always something that brings me back to reading it over and over again. I love the quote, “sooner or later every member of the Church must discover the scriptures for themselves.” And I truly believe that from discovering the scriptures, and more specifically the Book of Mormon, it has helped me to recognize why I keep coming back to the same book.

the church for sexual sin and not be in Gods glory, or be a member and settle for being an angle, or pray and God will help an individual to be able to marry in the temple with the opposite sex. Even though Mormons might not support same-sex marriage and especially in the temple, they are interacted to be kind and loving for everyone is God’s children.

Without being skeptical we would not be able to prove if something is truly right or wrong. But, in order to be civilly skeptical you must be tolerant. You have to be able to tolerate another person’s idea until you fully understand the basics in order to accurately disprove or prove it. With no tolerance for others’ ideas and beliefs the skeptical man would not be able to disprove the idea and/or belief because he would not fully understand the concept of it.

I agree with what you said, “Our culture perceives the Christian Gospel as a manufactured religion”, and different so-called true religion teaches this concept. They are blind because, they do not know the truth. The Bible states there will be false teacher among us denying the true word of God (Galatians 6-9). I believe that Satan’s workers test the faith of every man, believer, and non-believer. Somma states, “Operating in given authority and recognizing another’s authority is an important and vital part of the smooth running of every aspect and level of society. When authority is denied or usurped it leads to chaos” (Somma, 2009). Jesus endured Satan testing his faith in God in the wilderness; however, Jesus knew who he was and what

The most common phrase found in the Book of Mormon with the word “knowledge” in it was some version of “the knowledge of Christ.” We know this to be one of the central purposes of the Book of Mormon, to bring people to a knowledge of Christ. That led me to wonder, what does it really mean to know Christ? How can I come to know Him better? While studying the word “know” may bring some more results, I was interested to see that many different prophets taught about a knowledge of Christ.

Doubt disillusions senses of hope and acceptance that are created by the smallest positive moments, thus causing sorrow. To understand how doubt can do this, an examination of human nature would be most appropriate, and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is the perfect example for that. In the novel, the Monster had been raised without any knowledge of how the world truly was. He was lost in his own visions for most of his existence,

After reading Meditation one by Rene Descartes my mind started processing this information and understanding why do we doubt. One of the many reason has to do with seeking for the truth. Doubting is a process that many of us try to evade, especially because we are afraid of getting out of our comfort zone. Since the moment we born until now, whoever raise us influence our education and the way we do critical thinking. Even though we grab and learn information from our surroundings, we always tend to do what was thought. When we start doubting about something, we try to snap out of it, as quick as possible because we are afraid of that unknown world, were there is not answer.

In comparing ancient skeptics Titus Lucretius Carcus and Wang Ch’ung they come from two different backgrounds one of higher education another that had no former learning or training yet have great theories of mythology and philosophy of what was to be or could be in a person life. Special fears that shaped their lives and caused them to be superstitious and even skeptical in the way they lived their own lives. Skepticism is considered “is an attitude of doubting the truth of something, such as a claim or statement.” (Webster Dictionary, 2016).

Today people are led by what they think rather than what they know. It is our human nature to fear the unknown and it makes sense that we want to be certain of what's coming to be prepared. Having certainty allows a person to have satisfaction and confidence in what there doing, but if we were certain of everything would we doubt anything? Doubt is an interesting concept because it means one might have doubts on what's certain. Doubt is the key to knowledge, without doubt everything would be certain, if it hasn't been proven wrong that who says it isn't right. Doubt is what enables us to question and challenge the perfection of certainty. A person should have the ability to see the faults and weaks spots in things that seems perfect, they

If you’re a Christian, have you ever doubted God’s existence? Have you ever wondered if whether or not Jesus actually existed and rose from the dead? These kind of questions or doubts can happen to the best of and most committed servants of God.

1) In his attempt to prove that there is knowledge, what position does Descartes adopt and why? Rene Descartes claims a position of radical doubt. This position is to doubt everything, because of this position Descartes has certain doubts about everything that can possibly be doubted no matter how weak the grounds of the argument or doubting itself until he can discover a proposition that is logically undoubtable. [4] 2) As he begins his project, Descartes uses three "tools" (or, arguments) in support of his adopted position.

The Oxford English Dictionary defines doubt as a feeling of uncertainty or lack of conviction. In order to find the reasoning behind God's existence, Descartes doubts until he reaches the certainty of his physical and spiritual existence. Meditation II is all about the exploration of the human mind in order to find certainty and to rid of all sense of doubt. Using a term from the previous meditation known as sensory knowledge, he argues in Meditation II that what he sees does not actually exist, “Therefore I suppose that everything I see is false,” and that his memory is defective (17). The term sensory knowledge can be defined as the means of perceiving the world around you through the human senses. As a result of this argument, he seems to

Skepticism was a divided philosophy. One type of Skepticism supported sensory knowledge, while another completely rejected the idea of knowing anything. The philosophy of Skepticism greatly contradicted much of the philosophies of the past. One of the greatest philosophers Socrates, for example, admitted also to knowing nothing, but did not reject the idea of knowledge, and instead began on a life-long quest to find it. Instead of offering understanding and possible explanations about the nature of the world, there was simply doubt.