preview

Disadvantages Of Being An Outsider Analysis

Good Essays

The debate and argument between who can study a religion to the best possible degree is very interesting. You have the two main sides and types of people, insiders and outsiders. An ‘insider’ is someone who is a member of a religion and knows how the religion works from a first-hand perspective. Whereas an ‘outsider’ is someone who is not a member of a religion but is studying the religion for their own critical analysis and studies. There are pros and cons to both being able to study a religion and it’s important to truly look at both sides before casting your opinion on the topic.

There are many advantages to being an ‘insider’ in a religion. They themselves are or were a member of the religion. They know how this religion works, they are …show more content…

An outsider for example has no access to the rituals which are key to the study of religions. They cannot experience these rituals like an insider can even if they do partake or bear witness to a ritual in their studies. It may be hard for an outsider to not come across as being overly critical of a religion. While needing to have an objective view some may be too harsh in their writings. The aim of the outsider is very clear according to Knott (2010) that the aim of the scholar writing about a religion should not be to build up personal experience of the religion but to be able to “build upon the benefits of critical distance” and then explain their findings. However many insiders later are angry with the published works of outsiders due to the fact that they believe the writings and studies are too harsh. Of course this then leads us to the disadvantages of being an insider. Many insiders studying their own religion come under scrutiny because scholars believe their studies are biased to their own religion. Their writings may be highly subjective. As was seen by Knott (2010) when she studied Fatima Mernissi, a Muslim feminist and sociologist who was an insider but was able to write from a critical point of view while still keeping to her insider knowledge, but objectively. This example was able to show us the complexity insider scholars must …show more content…

Knott (2010), talks about this in her chapter Insider/outsider perspectives. She uses the work of Davis (1999) as he explained that this was a term used commonly in anthropology. It refers to the way of carrying out research by living and within a community of people and becoming part of a religion in order to study it for a period of time. The scholar will observe their way of life, their rituals in order to develop a deeper understanding of the religion. This was seen during the study carried out by Festinger, Riecken and Schachter (1956) when they gained acceptance and access to a prophetic group in order to study the ‘beliefs, attitudes and responses they wished to observe’ (Knott, 2010 p.249). This type of observation is quite successful as it allows the outsider to gain access to the real insider ways of life in order to aid their studies. It allows they to write critically and objectively but not harshly as they have been able to experience the community in a certain

Get Access