Discrimination and Special Educational Needs Essay

This act required the code of practice be introduced for guidance on identification and provision of special educational needs. The role of the SENCO was introduced in schools and parents were able to challenge local authorities about providing for pupils with SEN.

The Common Assessment Framework 2009 aims to identify additional need and promotes information sharing and coordination of services. Working Together to Safeguard 2003 outlines legal requirements for safeguarding, promoting welfare, roles and responsibilities of professionals and working together to keep children safe. The Munro Review 2012 regards the rights, wishes and feelings to shape the provision of services. The Safeguarding and Welfare Requirements of the Statutory Framework for EYFS 2014 outlines responsibilities for childcare providers for children 0-5 years. Special Educational Needs and Disability Code 2014 provides guidance relating to promoting the welfare of children and young people with special educational needs and

SEN Code of Practice 2001- The SEN code of practice 2001 provides a clear framework for identifying, assessing and meeting pupils' special educational needs.

All schools are required to produce a Disability Equality Scheme (DES) that sets out ways to promote equality opportunity, positive attitudes towards pupils, staff and others with disabilities.

Identify the current legislation and codes of practice relevant to the promotion of equality and valuing of diversity.

Code of Practice on the duty to promote race equality 2002, this is a statutory code which supports public authorities (including schools) to meet their duty set out in the Race Relations Act. It requires all schools to produce a written race equality policy which includes information on practical ways in which schools will work to promote race equality. School policies must demonstrate that they are working

The equality act 2010 provides a modern single legal framework with clear laws to be more effective in tackling discrimination and disadvantages.

Section 17 of the Children Act 1989 places a duty on local authorities to safeguard and promote the welfare of children in need and to promote the upbringing of children by their families, so far as this is consistent with their welfare duty to the child, by providing an appropriate range and level of services. A child in need is one who is disabled, or unlikely either to achieve a reasonable standard of health or whose health or development will suffer unless services are provided.

This law proctects people from prejudice and allows legal action to be taken against any person or company who is proven to have unfairly treated any of the protected groups covered by this Act.

The act was designed to make a difference to the education of SEN children by allowing them to have access to the educational facilities available all children. This is done by offering support tailored to the needs of the individual and their families whilst taking the opinion and wishes of the child into account with

Robert’s rights to inclusion is reinforced by the Special Educational Needs and Disability Act (2001) which gave Robert the right to attend mainstream school and to be educated alongside his peer (Thomas and Vaughan, 2005). The Act strengthened further the Disability Discrimination Act (1995) which makes discrimination again Robert unlawful. The United Nation Convention on the Right of the Child Article 23, highlights that a child with a disability should have effective access to and receive an education ( Jones , 2004) Tassoni (2003) underlined that The Children Act (1989) spelled out the idea that all children have rights. It required protecting all children, but also highlighting the needs and rights of vulnerable children. As with Robert, he is a child in need and as such the school and LEA has legal duties to make sure that Robert is achieving within society.

“The law is clearly an important part of anti-racism. The Racial Discrimination Act must be improved so that it can effectively tackle persistent discrimination… This includes both ensuring those experiencing racism’s harmful effects receive the appropriate services and support they require, but also to prevent racism as a critical determinant of health from occurring in the first place… Free speech is a fundamental democratic right that must be protected. So is the right to non-discrimination.” (Sweet, 2014)

The enactment of the Racial Discrimination Act, under the Whitlam government of 1975, heralded a revolutionary shift in the psyche of many; to this day it remains a cornerstone to peaceful race relations and the fundamental principle of equality before the law. Of particular note, it was the sanctioning of the provisions and principles enlisted under Section18 of this legislation which scrutinized the very framework to the legality of racial vilification from its previously applauded state. Introduced in an era when racial intolerance and discriminatory prejudice was the social norm, from the atrocities of the Stolen Generation to the infamous White Australia Policy, the nature of racial vilification was made unlawful. This move encouraged

Manley & Benavidez (2008) noted that the social dilemma regarded the disproportionality of minority and other subgroups. The Civil Rights act of 1964 was established to prevent the unlawful hiring practices. Validity and sector issues were concerns in that unfair hiring practices presented a specific set

On March 21, the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination is celebrated, a problem that far from disappearing has worsened in recent years. Racial discrimination is the term used to refer to the exclusion or unequal treatment of a person or group because of their race and it is a problem faced by millions of people around the world. The human rights code establishes equality of rights, opportunities, and non-discrimination for everyone and recognizes the dignity and value of each person. According to the code, everyone has the right to be free from racial discrimination. People should not be treated in a different way because of their race, their ancestry, color, place of origin, ethnicity, citizenship or creed. This applies to places like work, school, rental housing, or services such as warehouses, shopping