Discuss Pros and Cons for Joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a grand, 21st century regional free-trade treaty which was commenced on 2003. It initiated as a trade contract involving Singapore, New Zealand and Chile. Presently, the TPP consists of 12 countries as their members that includes US, Malaysia, Mexico, Canada, Japan, Brunei, China, Korea, Australia, Peru and Vietnam. Other countries like Bangladesh, Philippines, Indonesia, India etc. have also revealed their concern in merging with the TPP trade agreement. In 2011 the Trans-Pacific Partnership countries declared that the TPP is expected to “develop trade and investment accompanied by the TPP partner countries, to uphold innovation, economic expansion and advancement, and to support the formation and preservation of jobs. TPP will undo prospects for American employees, families, businesses, farmers, and ranchers by offering increased permission to some of the greatest growing markets in the world.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership aims to establish a tariff free economic cooperation zones between twelve countries around the Pacific Ocean. These countries are the United States, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam, thus creating the largest trade zone in the world (Jackson, 2015). The

The North American Free Trade Agreement between Canada, the United States, and Mexico continues to be greatly beneficial to Canada and its citizens after twenty-two years since the agreement came into effect in 1994. NAFTA has remained as one of Canada’s greatest assets, increasing trading traffic of goods and services. The free trade agreement benefits Canada because it creates more employment, provides Canadians with more selection in goods, and increases economic growth. The North American Free Trade Agreement brings Canada great leverage and will, in all likelihood, continue to benefit us in the future.

“Ways of the world” is among the most innovative books that encompass the world history. The book is written by Author Robert W.Strayer. He highlights the Greek culture giving some solid reasons why most Mediterranean world adopted the Greek culture that influenced them for a long time.

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) was introduce as vehicle spark growth between the United State and the European Union. The US and EU represent the most developed, modern and committed to the highest consumer protection in the world. It is the T-TIP goal to capitalize on the relationship by providing economic growth and more jobs to US and EU to 13 million jobs already supported by transatlantic trade and investment. It is the T-TIP goal and desire to cut the edge and tariff agreements to allow for greater compatibility and transparency, in trade and investment regulations, while maintaining high level of health, safety and environmental protection.

Apart from the free trade alliances with the U.S, Canada is also seen to possess agreements such as TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) and CETA (Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement). These trade agreements have facilitated creating strategic alliances with a number of nations such as Japan, Malaysia, Vietnam and Australia. Additionally strategic alliances have also been facilitated with many European nations19. Apart from reduction in tariff rates, trade of services, intellectual property and investments have become much more regulated and transparent. Expansion into Canada would therefore enable the companies to take advantage of such free trade agreements and develop alliances globally20. Since such trade alliances have strengthened the economy, infrastructural development in the nation has been quite rapid. Ease in business operations has therefore been facilitated. Additionally, access of new foreign markets have also become easy12.

of markets, including the auto industry, and in the spotlight, the dairy and beef markets.

The North American Free Trade Agreement, otherwise known as NAFTA, was placed into force on the first day of January in the year of 1994(Gov't of CA/US/MX). The agreement without doubt connected more businesses and economic growth into the following countries that have access to the agreement, including Canada, United States and Mexico (Canada International Global Affairs). From the following research conducted by multiple certified Canadian sources, they have proved that Canada’s prosperity has grown and created diverse and deeper commitments with the rest of North America (Canada International Global Affairs). Over the past few decades that NAFTA has been introduced in, they have had an excellent and positive effect on the Canadian economy.

The North American Free Trade Agreement, or N.A.F.T.A, was established to improve the economy of the United States, Mexico, and Canada. It has been close to twenty-three years since the treaty was officially signed; time has given us insight into the effects that this agreement has produced.

A partnership between Mexico, Canada, and the United States, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) created the largest free trade area in the world ("North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA),” n.d.). Signed in 1992 by George H.W. Bush, the treaty was preceded by the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement signed in 1989 (Tuesday, 2008). The document received bipartisan support in both the House and Senate with Republicans providing the majority of votes in each (Kessler, 2016).

A draft of a top-secret piece of interstate agreement on the Trans- Pacific Partnership leaked online causing a hot status to its discussion. Trans -Pacific Partnership (TPP) - is the largest supra-trade and economic organization, the creation of which is scheduled for completion by the end of 2013. In an agreement on the TPP participating countries, generating more than 40% of global GDP: the U.S., Australia, Canada, Mexico, Japan, Singapore, New Zealand, Malaysia, Brunei, Chile, Vietnam and Peru. China and Russia are not included to this list.

The greatest achievement that I have been able to accomplish in terms of securing the material national interest of the United States has been the agreement of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. This trade agreement amongst twelve member states (United States, Canada, Chile, Peru, Zealand, Australia, Brunei, Singapore, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Japan) was adopted to strengthen the economic ties for a more interconnected global economy. For the average working American it shows great promise to increase their income and for the nation as a whole. It also possesses the potential to allow for the growth of the nation’s GDP and annual exports, thereby increasing the living standard.

Have your eyes ever set on a barren land where even technology can’t reverse the damage we have caused? We care mostly for the present, but we must never forget to see to the future and in this case the deforestation of the Amazons. “Deforestation is considered the second largest anthropogenic source of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere” (Song et al. 2). Each day we are wiping out miles of trees from one of our most diverse ecosystems in the planet, and one of our largest “lungs” in the world. At our rate of destruction of the rainforest, we would have inflicted in our future a great disservice, as the trees cut down would no longer give us clean air and more CO2 would pollute our air. CO2 can have a negative impact on our health. As we breathe in this air, it can lead to lung cancer and other diseases. By destroying the Amazon ecosystem we could drive many exclusive species that only live in the Amazon to extinction. Will we know the harm we have caused right away? Probably not, but we will definitely find out sooner rather than later. The cause of the Amazon deforestation is due to our need for wood to stay warm, and for developing countries to use it for fuel. Our top priority in conserving the Amazons is the unforeseen environmental impact that can be caused to our planet and to us. “Tropical deforestation also has other negative externalities, such as the loss of biodiversity, erosion, floods, and lowered water levels” (Jusys).

While researching about criminal justice, I came across a few online articles with very shocking statistics about our current legal systems on the issue of capital punishment. The following statistics vividly captured my attention, “from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2000, 683 executions took place in 31 states”. Another statistic was that “1,188 people were executed in the US from 1977 through 2009”. From this figures, it came to my mind that 1,188 men, women, fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters and children were denied the chance to life by our legal systems without the opportunity of rehabilitation or change; to make matters worse, some innocent but evidence strongly supporting the conviction, call it being at the wrong place at the wrong time. In this essay I’d like to point out the negativity of capital punishment, otherwise known as the death penalty, and why our legal systems need to abolish it.

As mentioned earlier, the TPP is a major potential free trade agreement between twelve of the Pacific Rim countries. The countries are Australia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, The United States, Vietnam, Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, and Singapore (Freil, Sharon, Gleeson, Thow, Labonte, Stuckler, Kay, and Snowdon 1). Interestingly enough, this agreement is the technical successor to the P4 agreement that was initialised in 2006 (Elms 29). This agreement was held between Chile, Brunei, New Zealand, and Singapore. In 2008 the U.S. showed large interest in joining this agreement giving spark to a new agreement that has enticed other Pacific Rim countries (Elms 29). Taking charge of this new agreement the U.S. has laid down most of the TPP 's foundation to create an agreement that should allow for a