Many people today are protesting for their rights and what they say are their freedoms with civil disobedience which is the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. The 2016 election caused major diversity between Conservatives and Liberals, and along with these divisions, many are arguing for their own rights as for what they believe. Peaceful resistance to laws does not necessarily impact a free society negatively or positively, but if it is a resistance for the right reason, one may think it has a positive effect on a free society.
One example of civil disobedience having a positive effect on a free society is the case of Rosa Parks. Rosa Parks stood up for herself and others on behalf of the law for a reason that would soon change history. She took a major step into improving society by going against the Jim Crow Laws that were in place during that time of 1955 promoting segregation. By refusing to let a white man sit in her seat, Parks started a resistance that later helped lead to the end of segregation in the south. This is one case in which civil disobedience
…show more content…
Pro-life supporters use civil disobedience because they want to protect their view on life by peacefully going against the pro-choice organization, Planned Parenthood. Pro-life supporters want to take a stand to show the importance of life and how every human being is valuable and has a purpose. They resist the movement of Planned Parenthood because it goes against their belief whereas, pro-choice supporters use civil disobedience to protect their view on the issue of life saying it is always the woman's choice. Each side shows their support for their view on the issue, but the problem is that this caused major division between the two sides. Not everyone is going to have the same view, but this has caused division in a free society. It could be a while before the country settles on one
In a free society, people are given the opportunity to stand up for what they believe in. I believe that the act of civil disobedience, or peaceful resistance to laws, positively impacts a free society for a number of reasons. Civil disobedience can have a positive effect when the government is flawed or when the law being resisted is wrong or prejudiced. In these situations, civil disobedience and peaceful resistance can mend some of the injustices that were being inflicted. All governments, including democracies, are flawed.
The Civil Rights Movement is a substantial example of civil disobedience for the reason that they were peacefully protesting while accepting their consequences. On the other hand, people today believe that they're protesting peacefully however, peace can lead to violence and take away the credibility of their cause. Causing destruction in their community, where civil disobedience impacts society negatively because the situations get out of hand that cause chaotic cases which involves brutality.
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Looking back at examples from history, without Rosa Parks, the Woman’s Suffrage Movement, or Martin Luther King Jr., the society we live in would be extremely different. Civil disobedience continues to contributes a huge positive impact on the world we live in today.
Civil disobedience has been an act practiced by free societies across the globe. It has been a highly controversial topic in the Unites States over the years, as some believe the so-called "peaceful resistance" exemplifies too much defiance to the government. However, most believe that performing civil disobedience exercises many rights incorporated in the Constitution. Civil disobedience positively impacts a free society by allowing its citizens to express their opinions in a matter which draws the attention of the government, and heightens public awareness.
Civil disobedience is one of the most important cornerstones of the rights of the American people. Although it is dangerous at time and can often be less effective that violent protest, its benefits can neither be negated nor ignored. There have been several different individuals throughout history who have used the idea of civil disobedience to fight for their individualized causes. Rosa parks fought for the rights of black people, as well as women everywhere. The individuals who participated in the Boston Tea Party fought for the freedom and rights of the new colonists in America. Susan B. Anthony fought for the political and societal rights of women everywhere.
Civil disobedience is a peaceful protest where people refuse to follow certain laws with which they disagree. In the past, these issues included women’s suffrage and racial segregation. More recently, disagreements over the pipeline have led to protests, as well as many different protests about Planned Parenthood. People commit these acts in the hope to fix a part of their society. However, these acts are against the law, which can lead to negative consequences for the protesters.
When your human rights are being stripped, it is a great way to change society, as we see in Gandhi’s peaceful revolt. However, in many cases it is not necessary. It would do even more damage, especially if there are other, safer and more human ways for addressing concerns. Laws would be threatened as well as American infrastructure and economy. Through this, civil disobedience requires us to examine the situation. It requires intelligent people to sacrifice something for the greater good, and when it is necessary. The people thinking about disobeying must ask the question “is the law I am being pushed under unjust?” before performing the act. As Gandhi once said “An unjust law is itself a species of violence. Arrest for its breach is more so. Now the law of nonviolence says that violence should be resisted not by counter-violence but by nonviolence. This I do by breaking the law and by peacefully submitting to arrest and
Throughout American history are many examples of civil disobedience, and when we analyze the meaning of civil disobedience we realize that without this America would be a very different place. The Boston Tea Party, The Revolutionary War, The Civil Rights Movement are all a few major examples of civil disobedience that have shaped America into the world it is today. Civil disobedience, in a sense, is taking the law into ones own hands when they feel that the laws in place are unjust or unethical and want to change these laws to better ones own life and those of others. Sadly though, there are many lives on this Earth that cannot take the law into their hands, stand up for their rights, and change things for the better, and those lives are the
Civil disobedience is the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. This peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society and overtime, makes it more “free.” Remonstrating unjust laws also reveals how corrupt our society today is as a whole considering the hatred and retaliation exerted towards protestors. Overall, civil disobedience is necessary for society to adapt to the new norms of the forever-changing world.
If we take a closer look at civil disobedience, we can better understand what it means, its goals, and its outcomes. Civil disobedience predominantly exists as direct and non-violent government defiance. Instead of voicing an opinion with a vote or a simple conversation, civil disobedience stands up for what is right using an individual’s whole influence. Therefore, some sacrifices regarding the legality of actions are made in order to preserve the integrity of the mission. In other words, why should a protester follow the law that they are trying to alter? That doesn’t make much sense, therefore civil disobedience allows unjust laws to be broken for the greater good. This method is very effective if, for example, a minority is attempting to
Civil Disobedience can positively effect our society. If people blindly follow laws then the government has free reign to take advantage of the people under its jurisdiction. If no one stands up to fight when an individuals or a groups freedom is being taken advantage of then our political system has failed. They have a right, even if they are in a minority, to stand up for themselves and protect their liberties that are protected under the Constitution. "When the power is once in the hands of the people, a majority are permitted, and for a long period continue, to rule is not because they are most likely to be in the right, nor because this seems fairest to the minority, but because they are physically the strongest."
In summation, civil disobedience is a tool that has been used to improve our freedoms through the decades. It has allowed for peaceful ways for the people to stand up for something they believe in. As Henry David Thoreau said, “The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time, what I think is right.” That is what makes a society free, the ability to disagree with others,
Civil disobedience, nonviolently breaking a law and accepting its consequences, positively impacts a free society. This truth can be seen clearly through the American movement for racial equality, because the cause was undeniably just. By accelerating legislative change, leveraging social tension, and increasing civic engagement, the ongoing fight for racial equality demonstrates that civil disobedience is a force for good.
A common argument amongst many citizens in America is whether or not peaceful resistance, or civil disobedience positively or negatively impacts a free society. With numerous examples of civil disobedience occurring in the past, it is easy to see how America was affected by these acts. America has progressed since her founding, especially since people have started to take a stand in what they believe in. Civil disobedience can positively affect a society through making others aware of an issue and sparking an urge for change.
Morris I. Leibman says, “No society whether free or tyrannical can give its citizens the "right" to break the law. There can be no law to which obedience is optional, no command to which the state attaches an ‘if you please’." To some, the law is the law, plain and simple. If one breaks the law that is a criminal offense. Many also fear peaceful protests can turn into violent riots, as with the recent University of Berkeley protest. What started off as a peaceful gathering with poster boards quickly escalated to full riots, with students smashing windows, burning trees, and damaging the construction site of new dorms. Civil disobedience, according to some, can only result in violence due to agitators who wish to take advantage of a situation. Carl Cohen goes as far to say civil disobedience in itself is self-defeating. Breaking the law goes against the very thing protestors are protesting, which is to uphold what they believe is the correct version of the law. By breaking the law themselves, however, it is hypocritical of their