Discuss The Relationship Between The HRM And CSR Relationship

Different scholars have defined the nature, scope, importance & purpose of HRM in different ways. Listing all the definitions given to HRM by the scholars in the field lies beyond the scope of this study. Given that, an attempt was made to select the most comprehensive and relevant definitions of HRM to this subject of study as follows:

The purpose of this essay is to research the notion of CSR and uncover its true framework and outline what social responsibility truly means to corporate organisations, and whether it should be seriously considered to be a legitimate addition to the corporate framework of an organisation.

The existence of CSR performances guarantee the interest of stakeholders, which involving investors, sponsors, employees, consumers and suppliers. More specifically, for inner management, the workers can be treated respectfully and received well treatment. For example, the workers should be ethically treated when they make a contribution to the performance of organization. Which means the workers not only will improve the enthusiasm to the work, but also will hold the same attitude to handle their works and customers when they receive and be treated equally and ethically in the working environment. Consequently, the employees will make more profits by working in a comfortable workplace. Moreover, the performance of organization will be promoted dramatically by workers’ support.

Through these examples, it is clear that CSR can be embodied in a multitude of avenues affectively, and, that, constructive use of CSR has the potential to multiply throughout the respective industry that it is practiced in. 

Additionally, by practicing CSR, the internal wellbeing and job satisfaction of organisational members can also increase. Within Maslow’s hierarchy of needs (Maslow, 1943), the concept of ‘self-actualization’ (sic) and ‘self-transcendence’ is detailed as a human need to achieve goals outside oneself — an intrinsic desire to paint, create, innovate, and invent; therefore, it would be fair to suggest that figures in organisations who practice CSR have an easier time at fulfilling this step of the model. There’s also evidence revealing a positive correlation between organisational ethics and job satisfaction, indicating lower levels of Counterproductive work behaviours and absenteeism, and higher levels of Organisational citizenship (Viswesvaran, et al. 1998). Seemingly, as the company makes voluntary decisions for the better good, employees do the same. Furthermore, there’s also been findings showing that leaders of organisations can influence collective outcomes by supporting and acting out ethical behaviour (Koh, 2001). Meaning, people at the top of the organisation, can trickle down this ethical standard to create a culture that supports responsible behaviour. As in

n Karataş-Özkan, M., In Nicolopoulou, K., & In Özbilgin, M. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A diversity perspective.

CSR is the commitment of a company to behave ethically and to improve its employee’s quality of life, while contributing to economic development. Companies are expected to work with CSR and it can be rewarding for both customers and companies. However, CSR can be damaging for a company if it is performed incorrectly. For example, if the organization`s CSR efforts are focused on areas

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is something that affects all companies and should be an active factor in the company’s decision making. It is something all corporations need to care about. CSR is when business’ or corporations take part in an initiative or campaign for a cause that will benefit society and/or in some way make the world a better place (Taylor, 2015). Initially, Corporate Social Responsibility started to take shape around the 1950’s, but some say that it dates all the way back to the 1800s, the idea of CSR was seen (Carroll, 2007). One may think that because it is dated so long ago, it doesn’t have an important impact today nevertheless, it is proven that Corporate Social Responsibility is a pathway for entities to self benefit as they are in the process of benefitting society.

In this article, “The Truth About CSR,” authors Rangan, Chase and Karim stress the importance in aligning a company’s social and environmental activities with its business purpose and values (Rangan, Chase, & Karim, 2015, 41). Outcomes of CSR programs should be a “spillover” and not a primary focus of a business, expressing concern towards social responsibility and corporations failing to contribute to society accordingly (Rangan, Chase, Karim, 2015, 42). There is a great deal of importance in companies refocusing their CSR activities on a primary goal and in providing an organized process for bringing consistency and discipline to CSR strategies (42). Rangan, Chase and Karim want corporations to understand why it is important for them to evaluate their CSR activities and refocus them towards the goal of reinforcing the firm’s societal and environmental actions, while also ensuring their actions add to the overall purpose and values of the corporation. According to the authors, even though

CSR is entwined in the strategic planning process of many multinational organizations. The reasons behind social, human and environmental responsibility whether driven by ulterior motives, enlightened self-interest, or interests beyond the enterprise, is subjected to much debate.

CSR lacks universal methods. The United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) mentions that it is important to draw a distinction between CSR as part of strategic business management concept and charity, sponsorships or philanthropy. The latter applications make valuable social impacts that enhance the reputations of the companies, however, CSR is a continual effort instead of an instance. A few features that CSR should focus on are: eco-efficiency, employee and community relations, environmental management, gender balance, responsible souring, anti-corruption, stakeholder engagement and human rights. Utilizing some of these key features a company can bring competitive advantages into the market place. Increased sales and profits from operational cost savings as well as improved reputation and brand image and customer loyalty can result from a well-defined CSR strategy.

This report evaluates the roles of the CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) for increasing the level of managerial effectiveness of the employees based on ASDA. Application of the CSR practices can create several opportunities for retaining the best employees at the workplace. It can set up the standards of the employees by considering the flexibility at the workplace. It considers equality and diversity at the workplace and measures valid performance measurement scale. CSR applications can protect the rights of the employees and motivates the organisations for not taking part into any illegal business operations. ASDA has taken consideration of the CSR applications by developing a family oriented organisational culture

Employees, as members of an organization, contribute a lot to the enterprise’s manufacture, management and profitability. Corporations’ CSR activities definitely have an enormous influence on the qualities of employees’ behaviors. (Nan, X. & Heo, K. 2007, p.65) Employees may react negatively when they perceive a corporate injustice because that implies a mismatching with their values and threatens their psychological demands. CSR activities on employees are consisted of many aspects, such as skill training, working condition, payment as well as health and safety. Every corporation has its own human and labor policies.

Both views on Corporate Social Responsibility have become the topic of controversy as CSR is becoming increasingly essential for the society where the business operates. With time the classical theory or the narrow view of CSR is becoming fader and the socio-economic approach is gaining motion. Internationally most businesses are adopting CSR along with their economic interests.

The importance and eminence of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) across the business world started to increase during 1998-2007. Role conflicts often arise when competing demands like business goals and social goals are in question. The increase in the sense of social responsibility,stakeholder pressures and concerns for the environment has heightened the focus of businesses on CSR. A business that fulfils its CSR sufficiently can expect an improvement in its financial performance,enhanced brand reputation, a reduction in its operating costs,long term sustainability, a boost in staff commitment,innovation and production,better risk management,good relations with its stakeholders and development of closer links with customers. However,in today 's world CSR is not being dealt with serious and proper attention hindering the success of businesses.Business ethics concern the study of proper trading policies and practices regarding potentially controversial issues.They are guided by law and are based on a certain scheme that businesses should follow in order to gain public approval and be successful.CSR embraces responsibility for the behaviour of companies and motivates them to have a positive contribution and impact

The purpose of this literature review will be to examine the definition of CSR and the role of HRD in organisations. In considering the function of HRD in response to CSR, there is much inconsistency and debate in defining what exactly constitutes socially responsible practice. The reason for this is corporate social responsibility (CSR) practice occurs in different contexts and is dependent on perceptions to the individual. Ultimately there are gaps in literature, which occur as a result of key problems in defining what CSR is to organisations and the role of HRD professionals. There is much inconsistency and debate in defining what exactly constitutes socially responsible practice. The issue of HRD and it’s impact in relation to CSR has been brought to light by the emergence of increased awareness both of the power of corporations in the global economy, and of some of the negative repercussions of global economic activity (Wilcox 2006).