Discuss The Stakeholders Organizations And People Who Are Impacted By The Public Policy

There are many take-aways I have learned from attending this course. The first take away that stood out to me from this course would be responded to my fellow classmates during group discussions. Not only did this serve as an opinion-based discussion, but I gained vast knowledge on different topics pertaining to policy advocacy. The second take away that stood out to me would have to the online skills advocacy assignment. This assignment helped me to explore several ideas and perform research on how to advocate for a population that was in need. This information would be considered as an aid to guide me during the near future to improve my skills as a social worker. The last take away that I have learned from this course would be being apart

This paper is a review of chapter’s one (1), two (2) and three (3) in Thomas A. Birklands (2016) fourth edition regarding policy process. The reading attempts to define and show what is meant by policy process, how government, politics and the public are intertwined, problems that are associated with the policy process and how we address the problems. Current day events as well as past history are applied to the practice of policy process which assists in defining the process and highlighting its connection and importance. Thomas A. Birklands refers to the Clinton administration, the Obama administration and the George W. Bush administration, the DARE Program, World War II, and the Vietnam War, in the chapters and leads us down a path discussing

In order to first start a policy process, the problem for which a policy is to be created must be identified and the policy holding a solution to the problem. Researchers and stakeholders will investigate the problem to identify if the policy will reach the policy making agenda. Policies must be to improve society’s health and wellbeing. In the United States (U.S.) public health related issues that require a formulation of a new policy and come from local, state, or federal legislations which ruling govern the provision of health care services and regulations. In this

Government, all the way from Capitol Hill down to the small cities across the nation, is filled with the elected officials who represent the citizens of that city and state. When people think about who represents them, who comes to mind first? The Senator? The Representative? The mayor? Despite being categorized at different levels of the government, state and federal, each of these officials are tasked with representing their state and hometowns, and each of their jobs is just as important as the other. Their job, in short, is to represent the interests of the people who elected them into office. In this essay, I will identify the individuals who represent me and evaluate the extent to which I feel represented.

(2001). The Formulation of Health Policy by the Three Branches of Government. Social Policy and Policymaking by the Branches of Government and the Public-at-Large. doi:10.7312/stei11682-014

It is important to say that the tension between the state and federal government and among the federal branches foster democratically accountable government. For example, the ongoing dispute between Arizona and the Obama Administration concerning immigration policy. Arizona has framed its opposition to federal immigration policy as a challenge not to the federal government as a whole, but rather to the federal executive branch in particular (Loyola, 2014). States matter more

Everyone is impacted by the public policy-making, whether it’s federal, state, and local because the results of the decision-making have a major effect of our economic welfare. At the federal level (Executives) interacts with the Congress to get their policy proposal placed on the congressional agenda. At the state level they have their own agenda priorities, and these priorities will affect how states act in the federal system, attempting to influence the federal agenda in pursuit of state-level goals. The emerging literature about states’ impacts on internal and external agendas demonstrates the importance of challenging accepted views of the interactions between federal levels. This process relates to the policy stream as it relates to the text, where policy players, either inside or outside the government, would like to secure action. For instant, in the health care area, Senator Ted Kennedy (D. Massachusetts) was active in getting health care reform on the congressional agenda. At the local level they interact with the governor to get their program on the agenda. The Governor interacts with Congress, since all legislation goes through Congress for action. No matter what level of the government, federal, state, or local, they all share the same outcome, and that is, having their program placed on the agenda for action.

In the United States (US) we have a government. Within a government are different branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. Each one of these branches serves a different purpose, all to benefit our country. These spots are occupied by what we refer to as government officials, some ranking high others low. Most of the people in this category are elected, and are given a certain amount of time they can serve in the position they were voted into. This paper, however will hone in on the government of a specific state, the state of New Mexico (NM). It will focus on the government officials of NM, such as: the governor, state representatives, and senators. It will give a brief explanation of each official, the party they are affiliated with,

One of the topics we have discussed, and read about in this course is the role that the State Governments have in the expansion of their Medicaid program. It’s a tough decision, but it seems to have caught the eye of most Americans. Many states are not sure if they should expand their programs, with the help of the Federal Governments. It’s been said that 17 states have already outright rejected two major parts of this act (Branham 2013, 10). The real question now is will expanding Medicaid help give everyone insurance benefits, so they can stay healthy? That is the question that Governors, and Legislatures are asking themselves when it comes to saying thanks, or no thanks, to the

While the ultimate fate of the PPACA rests in the hands of Congress, states are best positioned “to adopt their own reforms—separate from, and independent of, Obamacare’s exchange design” (Haislmaier, 2011, para. 3). Taking an independent approach will give the state a strategy that has both aggressive and protective components, as well as negate federal interference and disruption. Equally important it allows the state to take the lead in developing patient-centered and pro-market reform that offers “increased choice, competition, and value” (Haislmaier, 2011, para. 5). The latter is especially important in the event the PPACA is repealed. Notably, the PPACA has caused significant congressional divide; however, politics must never factor into the decisions regarding access to health coverage. Therefore, as an elected official there’s a dutiful obligation to serve the health needs of your constituents.

As the election approaches, it’s significant to understand the responsibilities of state senators. A conscientious senator can bring numerous remarkable prospects for the state and people. Otherwise, people will suffer from various inconveniences. In the United States, state senators are officials who represent their own districts within the states. In most states, state senators are required to serve in the house of the state government’s legislature and one role in common is state senators must represent their districts’ residents. For representing the constituents, the state senators need to listen and read the emails and letters which express the constituents’ opinions. Next, the state senators should attend to constituents. They can talk to constituents, give public speeches and provide official updates. Although state senators are not required to propose legislation, they treat it as their responsibilities in order to benefit the constituents. Considering with the basic benefits and future of the state and people, I

The federal government within the United States is established on the grounds of a tripartite form as separate powers are assigned to each division of the government. However, the legislative and the executive branch play crucial roles in executing laws under the federated system (Sidlow and Henschen 260). Yet, differences exist within each body, allowing for clashes to take place affecting the way the bureaucracy functions. For example, considering one of the most controversial issues evident within the contemporary generation is the implementation of the Affordable Health Care Act. Since the start, the ACA has been under the radar due to oppositions addressed by different ideologies and political parties (Semro, Huffingtonpost.com) implying the challenges present within the democratic form of the government.

The government is in charge of operating the most diverse nation in the world while trying to take the best interests of as many people as possible. Controversy is unavoidable in a country with diversity among races, ethnicities, and political feelings. Public policy is not exempt from controversial legislation. Chapters 10 and 13 thoroughly discuss the issues of legal and social equality as well as policy relating to private morality. The formation of public policy relating to private morality and social equality is highly controversial because there are targeted groups that will benefit and non targeted groups that will be ignored by the policy; however a policy like affirmative action affects both targeted and non-targeted groups.

In some circumstances, a quasi-experimental design of research can be used to determine if a correlation between a policy change and the results have a cause and effect relationship. Please explain the basics of a quasi-experimental design, and explain how that framework can be used at a state level to try to measure the effectiveness of the public policy. (Points : 30)

My difficult questions surround the doing and the reading of the policy process. There are three areas that I would like further explore: the role of citizen participation in the policy process, importance of critical and postmodern perspectives in understanding public policy, and the role of government.