Discuss the Advantages and Disadvantages of Company Mergers and Acquisitions.

Merging with another organization has downfalls of destroying wealth from the merger. Considering the buying price is important when merging, spending too much on the merger will impound the value after the merger. Some mergers do not create wealth so capital is lost through the merger. There is no guarantee of financial gain and every formula considered with focus, just as with an acquisition. The final decision dictated by the variables. One company merging with another company takes the debt and losses of those companies in the new formed company.

Mergers and acquisitions have become a growing trend for companies to inorganically grow a business within its particular industry. There are many goals that companies may be looking to achieve by doing this, but the main reason is to guarantee long-term and profitable growth for their business. Companies have to keep up with a rapidly increasing global market and increased competition. With the struggle for competitive advantage becoming stronger and stronger, it is almost essential to achieve these mergers. Through research I will attempt to dissect the best practices for achieving merger success.

A strength from performing a merger is the ability to acquire a company’s unused debt. “Some firms simply do not exhaust their debt capacity. If a firm with unused debt capacity is acquired, the new management can then increase debt financing, and reap the tax benefits associated with the increased leverage” (Keown, 2005, pp. 23-4). Another strength is enabling Baderman Island to remove an ineffective management strategy or team. Baderman Island has the option to decide who stays with the merged company, and who is out the door. Often times, a weak management leading team is the problem the organization has not evaluated for its mediocre success. “The merger of two firms can result in an increase in market or monopoly power. Although this can result in increased wealth, it may also be illegal. The Clayton Act, as amended by the Celler-Kefauver Amendment of 1950, makes any merger illegal that results in a monopoly or substantially reduces competition. The Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission monitor all mergers to ensure that they do not result in a reduction of competition” (Keown, 2005, pp. 23-4).

Mergers and acquisitions are the right practical choice for accelerating the development cycle for the companies because there are some advantages from broadening and market extension, such as enhancing business performance, increasing profits, and overall shareholders value. However, it may be there some negative impacts on the company. For example, team management can face some obstacles such as culture, legislation and laws and command-and-control. I believe if there are more beneficiaries and less losers then acquisition or merger is ethical model. The potential of failure for merger or acquisition is high; trying to integrate firms with two different cultures, legislation and laws is difficult. For example, if the company merged or acquired with another company in the same field, it is difficult to grow sales because there aren't really new potential customers. The key to growth through merger or acquisitions is a faster, less expensive, and a much less risky

Although there is a high degree of attention on the financial calculations in these strategic decisions, Cartwright & Cooper (1992) show that 50 percent of all acquisitions fail financially. The reason for this is usually that the human factor plays a larger role than what is recognized during the decision process. According to Buono & Bowditch (1989) most of the problems that affect the result occur internally by the dynamics in the new organization. The human factor is therefore an element that should not be ignored during those strategic changes. A merger is not something that happens to an organization, it happens to the people within the

Mergers and acquisitions immediately impact organizations with changes in ownership, in ideology, and eventually, in practice. There are multiple reasons, motives, economic forces and institutional factors that can, taken together or in isolation, influence corporate decisions to engage in mergers or acquisitions. The financial risks of merging with or acquiring an organization in another country and how those risks can be mitigated are important issues for corporations to conduct research on. This paper will examine the sensible and dubious reasons for mergers and acquisitions and the benefits and costs of the cash and stock transactions.

This essay will report the process of this merger happened in 2014 and analyze the impact of this financial event on both parties by using relevant financial theory.

This project report provides comprehensive information about corporate structures; focusing on friendly and hostile takeovers, introducing them through definitions and some witty examples and finally ending with intriguing discussion and conclusions. Why do companies embrace the idea of merger and acquisition in the first place? Reason is the creation of the value that enables companies to have a competitive

The nature of change being witnessed in the contemporary business environment has made mergers and acquisitions a common feature. In the context of mergers, some two or more companies engage in negotiations and start to operate as a single entity. On the other hand, in acquisitions, one large firm acquires a smaller company. While on paper, these two components, both mergers, and acquisitions, may appear straightforward; the gist of the issue is that there is significant complexity associated with both measures.

A merger or acquisition is a combination of two companies where one corporation is completely absorbed by another corporation. The less essential company loses its identity and becomes part of the more imperative corporation, which retains its identity. A merger extinguishes the merged corporation, and the surviving corporation assumes all the rights, privileges, and liabilities of the merged corporation (Gomes, 2011). A merger is not the same as a consolidation, in which two corporations lose their separate identities and unite to form a completely new

The rest of this essay is as follows. In order to show the importance of mergers to social economic development and corporate growth, section 2 will outline the development of merger activities and volume of corporate mergers in European and American market. Section 3 will focus on the sound economic reasons of three different types of mergers to discuss their important role in corporate mergers. Section 4 will introduce the concern of reducing the agency cost via mergers to display other possible motives for mergers and section 5 will conclude.

The employees are supposed to have alarming beliefs and questionable attitudes toward the merger and if those attitudes do not get properly managed, it will badly affect the company’s performance. The most questionable attitude in this case could be employee’s perception toward management decisions as it could a sense of uncertainty within them. They become more sensitive to their future as any uncertain thought about company’s decisions and actions could let them thin that their job is at stake. Thus staff turnover is quite probable as no employee could thrive in uncertain work environments. Differences in opinions, either professional or technical could also result in employees’ frustration and developing angry attitude resulted by genuine work complaints (Nelson, D. & Quick, J., 2006)

It is evident that there has been an increase in merger activity over the past few decades around the world and according to Peacock and Bannock (1991) the lure of mergers to be a way of expansion and it can be represented in few main points that motivate the activity.

There has been much discussion on the issue of whether can firms achieve growth by the means of acquisition of another firm. Acquisition can be generally defined as “taking possession of an asset by purchase.” (Business Dictionary, 2014) Although some researchers have argued that acquisition can contribute to firm growth, others take a different view that, to some extent, most of the acquisitions fail resulting in over confidence of CEO and the fraud by acquired firm. For instance, Sudarsanam (2003) suggested that successful acquisitions constitute less than 50% of all acquisition. This essay will aim to demonstrate that firms in their majority cannot always achieve growth by the means of acquisition of another firm.

There is an on-going debate regarding the issue of acquisition with regard to the advantages and disadvantages of acquisition. There are some claims that acquisition producing positive outcomes and drives companies toward success. However, the acquisition is mainly considered to produce more negative outcomes and drive companies toward failure. Company acquisition is better to be described from a point of considering as expansion processes where a company is purchasing another company for the purpose of maximizing profit. Even though there are some disadvantages of acquisition, but acquisition is a useful tool for business growth, such as management