Disobedience Essay

“The concept of righteous civil disobedience is incompatible with the concept of the American legal system.”

Published in the year 1776, common sense is an open challenge to the British government and the royal monarchy of that time. Paine spoke the language of a common person and worked for the independence of Great Britain. Paine states his opinion by arguing at the American Independence beginning with the theoretical and general reflections about religion and government and move on to the specifications about the situation in the colonies. By doing so, he aims to persuade the people to become more patriotic and join the fight against the British to become an independent nation. At the same time, Thoreau was one of the exciting practitioners of writing and was an intuitive genius. He worked hard to revise as well as refined his material.

Civil disobedience and peaceful protest have been and caused a great impact on this country. The United States of America is something that has been greatly changed by these acts and continues to change due to the act of civil disobedience by the countries citizens. The use of peaceful protest and resistance to a law in a free society is something that impacts it for the better of the nation.

He succeeded at changing laws by developing his people and by setting the example for them to follow. He gave the villagers a direction in which to go and demonstrated how to get that way but then let them do it on their own in order to sustain the positive change. By educating the people about morals and values, Gandhi brought his followers up to be leaders themselves. By living with the people, Gandhi was able to discuss his morals and values and created a reason for them to thrive and do well. He created a sense of pride for their heritage and gave them a meaning for existence. With all of Gandhi’s actions, his transformational and servant leadership methods brought about radical social change and India was ultimately freed from British

The Core of American Freedoms have always been incorporated within the wills of the people. So pounded into today's society of younger population that we are free to choose our own paths and morals is all fundamentally linked to the practice of civil disobedience. If we don't agree with a law, we protest it. Civil disobedience as a whole in the long-run has shown to be a positive power that has moved our government and society for the better.

Civil disobedience is it the answer to big government control or the bigger problem to today society. This is what we all must ask ourselves in this situation to look ahead for the future.

There is a lot of discussion about how to handle social change through nonviolent protest and passive resistance. The people who agree with this idea, such as the citizens in South Africa who followed the practice of satyagraha. Since they followed in their leader, Mohandas Karamch and Gandhi, they stood their ground and applied the “non- cooperation movement”.Which is becoming self- reliant and also not supporting British products. However, there are also strong arguments against this. For example, the British authorities saw Gandhi’s protest as civil obedience. In conclusion, I think Gandhi’s way of handling social change is more effective, because as stated in the reading that many civil right leaders were inspired and his teachings and

Strong, resilient, and peaceful are three words that pop into peoples minds where they think of Gandhi. Gandhi was born on October 2, 1869, and he came from a Hindu family. His family was in the third caste. When he was growing up, there was a lot of racism from Britains in India. Indians had little rights when Gandhi was growing up. When Gandhi realized this, he dedicated his life to fighting for India and its inhabitants rights. Gandhi changed the world by showing people that you can be overwhelmingly strong without using force when he and thousands of other citizens and Indian rights activists protested peacefully, and shook the world. When Gandhi died, he left behind his legacy as father of peaceful protest.

Is disobedience a valuable human trait? And if it is why? Why do we need this in our lives? How does it benefit us as humans? Can it affect our personality? I would like to believe that we all need a little disobedience once in awhile.

Martin Luther King stated “Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' But conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but because conscience tells one it is right.” Conscience is the main sense of human being that helps to distinguish what is wrong and what is right. Thus, conscience has to be a main driving force when people encounter unjust laws of government. One of the philosophers who favored this idea was Henry David Thoreau. Specifically, he proposed a theory that a personal conscience is the main sense, which is responsible for basic rudiments of social principles and argued that if

The insights that I received from this parable is always doing the right thing even when you do not quite agree. In this case like in the parable the King asked his servants to invest the money while he was gone. The servants that did what was told great was their rewards. I also think just like verse 26 said “those who use well what they are given even more will be given but from those who do nothing, even what little they have will be taken away. I feel as if it is best to work with whatever a person is given because as this parable shows the consequences of disobedience of not doing

Mahatma Gandhi (1869- 1948). Played a huge role in India independence by inspiring movement for civil rights, non-violence and freedom around the world. He led his followers by example. He inspires them to give their best to India. His strong vision for a change in India reflects Gandhi as a transformational leader.

Mahatma Gandhi, the hero of the Indian Independence struggle, was the architect of a form of non-violent civil disobedience that would influence the world. Mahatma Gandhi studied both law and religion and advocated for the civil rights of Indians, both at home under British rule and in South Africa. Gandhi became a leader of India’s independence movement, organizing boycotts against British institutions in peaceful forms of civil disobedience

Mahatma Gandhi was the primary leader of India’s independence movement and also the architect of a form of non-violent civil disobedience that would influence the world.

     Mahatma Gandhi was a national icon for the people of India between the years 1869 and 1948. He is still remembered all over the world today. To follow the path of Gandhi one must traverse all regions of India, from the houses of the highest officials to the poorest villages where the word poverty does injustice. Gandhi led a fearless resistance against the British government, that oppressed his people, and an endless pilgrimage to lift the spirits of his people(the people of India) to maturity. Gandhi was very unique in his approach as he preached non-violence and led a life similar to that of the most downtrodden people of India.