Disputes Over the the Design Argument and The Theory of Evolution

Charles Darwin proposed the theory of evolution to explain the origin, diversity and complexity of life. I will will disprove evolution by showing that natural selection only explains small evolutionary changes, collectively known as microevolution. Natural selection cannot drive large evolutionary changes, macroevolution. I will also show that the primordial soup, in which life supposedly evolved, did not exist.

The first version of the Design argument came from Plato, a Greek philosopher, who developed it to address the universe's apparent order. Plato proposed in his book Timaeus that a “demiurge”, a divine being of supreme wisdom and intelligence, was the creator of the

Intelligent Design is the idea that living creatures on Earth are so complex that, they could not possibly have been created through the natural selection. It is the belief that there must be an ?intelligent designer? that created us all. This creator is usually referenced as God. However, it may also be

The debate over Evolutionary theories and Creationism beliefs has been a major debate throughout our churches, education system, and even our homes. There have been countless scientists, theologians, journalists and Christians that have studied both sides of the spectrum, that argue how the world we live in was created. Many empty statements, with little to no facts, just assertions about this particular question have been stated in many debates all over the world. So on one side we have Creationism belief that essentially argues that God is the “intelligent designer” and on the other side Evolutionary theories that state the world has evolved over the centuries. In the Merriam- Webster dictionary, Creationism is defined as, “a doctrine or theory holding that matter, the various forms of life, and the world were created by God out of nothing and usually in the way described in Genesis “. Merriam- Webster dictionary also defines Evolution as, “a theory that the differences between modern plants and animals are because of changes that happened by a natural process over a very long time; the process by which changes in plants and animals happen over time; a process of slow change and development”. So is it possible to believe both of those definitions?

In his discussion of the argument from design, which he links with teleological principles, the author refers to the concept of design in a way that alludes to the conviction that there are certain divine manifestations in the world that are so perfect that they must revolve around a grand architect who conceived them to be that way. Therefore, he says that proving such an argument requires "indisputable examples of design or purpose" (McCloskey, 1968, p. 64). However, this standard of indisputability that McCloskey is holding this argument to,

The study of science is defined as that which deals with the workings of the physical world we are able to observe and measure. The origin of life, however, is a topic that science has long grappled with, despite the impossibility of observing or proving any origins theory in a strictly scientific manner. Today, the widely accepted theory of life’s beginning is the theory of Evolution by mutation and natural selection, or Neo-Darwinism. Most people in our modern society accept this theory at face value because it is popular with the majority of scientists, but it must always be taken into account that our origins cannot be proven scientifically and that, in fact, the theory of Evolution is not the only or even the most logical theory

There are two basic theories in this debate. The first is the historical default, the creation model of origins. This theory maintains that the intricate design infiltrates all things, which implies a designer. The second theory is the more recent, atheistic explanation, the evolution model of origins. This theory suggests that the intricate design infiltrates all things and is a product of random chance and excessive time.

Intelligent design is not an alternative theory to evolution. Intelligent design is the belief that organisms or other things did not evolve, but were created just as they are now. In the video, the science teachers of Dover High School refuse to read a one minute statement to their classes explaining that intelligent design is an alternative theory to Darwin’s theory of evolution. Their refuting argument were as follows,

The fine-tuning design argument is one the seven olden and present day forms of a design argument. An example of this the world if few items or belongings of the earth change in some small way it can change the way of life here. If everything remains the same, then we can view life as fine-tuned. Fine-tuned has two accounts for its views. One is the chance and the creative , for someone to make the universe the why it is then and now and how life is friendly. It’s the fact that they argument of design happens by incidental, help gives people think it wasn’t planned or forced. Why is the fine-tuning design argument in a much stronger position than the biological design arguments? First we have to know the biological design arguments before

The argument of intelligent design is bad. The conclusion of "Therefore, the world has a designer and creator, which is one, infinite, omnipotent, omniscient, benevolent being, namely, God." is not false, but it does not follow the premises. The universe is not like a material man-made object. It is much more precise and complex that no one knows how it works efficiently except for God. Many people come together to build houses and other buildings, just because they can construct a well suitable house to live in does not mean that the constructors of the house is a perfect omniscient being. They could be drunkards, murderers, or ignorant for all we know

The argument of design isn’t about the question of God’s existence but about the answer to the nature of God. The Design argument, also known as “a posteriori”, is to prove the existence of God who has the characteristics of being all- powerful, all- knowing and benevolent.The intelligent design is about observations and coming to conclusions which try to prove the natural world is created by an intelligent being. An analogy was presented between human artifacts and nature to determine that the creator of this natural world must be intelligent.

Intelligent Design is a scientific research program as well as a community of scientists, philosophers and other scholars who look for evidence of design in nature. Through their study, they are able to determine whether various natural structures are the product of chance, natural law, intelligent design, or of some combination. Such research is conducted by observing the types of information produced when intelligent agents act. Scientists then seek to find objects which have those same types of informational properties which we commonly known come from intelligence. Intelligent design has used these scientific methods to detect design in complex biological structures, the complex and specified information content in DNA, the life-sustaining physical architecture of the universe, and the geologically rapid origin of biological diversity in the fossil record. The theory of intelligent design is an effort to detect whether the "apparent design" in nature acknowledged by virtually all biologists is genuine design or is simply the product of an undirected process such as natural selection acting on random variations. This purports that design can be detected without any understanding of who the designer is or why the agent acted, or even how the

The Design Argument was created by William Paley. He uses and Analogy known as the watch analogy. Imagine you are in a field and you find a watch. You have never seen a watch before. You ask who made it and see how complicated it is. Your friends say ‘nobody’, it appeared by chance’. You think your friend is crazy. Someone had to design the watch for the purpose of telling time. You conclude that the design of the watch is too complex to not have a creator. If there is a design for technology, why is there not a design for nature? Paley calls nature’s designer God. Some people agree with this argument because when they look around they see evidence supporting this argument and it is easier to understand than some of the other arguments. Others think that Nature evolved to be complex .the survival of the best in nature means the animals that can adapt live and those that cannot become extinct. Why would God design something that would become extinct? Also I god designed everything, then why is there so much in nature that is cruel? Why didn’t he eliminate diseases, deformities and

If the question was posed as to what is the debate between creationism vs. evolution consist of, the thought that it is ‘“God did it” vs. “Natural processes did it,”’ (Scott, 2004) may arise. Science cannot absolutely prove or disprove Creation or Evolution. Yet scientist and the remainder of society use creationism and evolution to prove our existence. Creationist believe in the Christian account of the origin as recorded in Genesis. Creationism is the belief that statements such as “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth” (NIV) found in Genesis 1:1 and also “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” (NIV) found in John 1:1. Evolution is the belief that everything just changed over

There are three major refutations against the design argument, first she designs argument is faulted for its weak analogy between the natural objects and the objects that that is known to have a creator such as buildings. This is the equivalent of comparing apples to oranges. For the second refutation the design argument claims that everything has a perfect design, this simply isn’t the case. For example, we can examine the issues of starvation within the United States, although the world is structured to perfectly provide food for humans, there still people starving because of imperfect circumstances such as the inability to transport food to those who can`t receive it themselves (Tombs 7). The strongest and most accepted argument against the design argument is the theory of evolution and adaptation. Those who support the theory of evolution and adaptation credits the perfect design of the aspects to those two concepts. Artic Fish are an example of this adaption, they have developed a protein in their blood that prevent their blood from freezing which allows them continue their metabolic functions (Lloyd 2). The finally argument against the design theory states that even if the premise of the argument is true, its doesn’t necessarily confirm the existence of God.