preview

Dissociative Identity Disorder Summary

Decent Essays

Introduction:The act of disassociating is undoubtedly common in our society today; especially in people who have endured a strikingly traumatic experience. Dissociation can most definitely change a person's outlook on life,sometimes leading to Dissociative Identity Disorder. Even though Dissociative Identity Disorder has a place in The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the legitimacy of the psychiatric disorder is still very much a controversial issue . In these two articles, “Multiple Personality -- Is It Mental Disorder, Myth, or Metaphor?” published in the Huffington Post website by Frances(2014) and Dimensions of “Multiple Personality Disorder” by Murray(1994) published by the Proquest Central, they show two different …show more content…

The scholarly article has a very erudite and objective tone. The author seems particularly learned in the subject of Dissociative Identity Disorder. It may also be very clear to the reader that Murray(1994) is a very unbiased writer. There are no signs of personal feelings or opinions displayed in this article. (Murray,1994,pg 4) states, “The strong association between MPD and history of childhood abuse has been documented.” (Murray,2014,pg4) then follows with a statement, “More prospective studies as well as those that obtain independent corroboration of reported childhood sexual abuse will be needed”, simply meaning the author would prefer for there to be more evidence regarding the correlation between Dissociative Identity Disorder and childhood sexual abuse before the he draws a conclusion for the possibility of childhood sexual abuse being a cause of Dissociative Identity Disorder. The tone in the popular article is a little more condescending and incredulous. Unlike the scholarly article, the popular article shows vast amounts of negative personal feelings and opinion towards Dissociative Identity Disorder. (Frances,2014,pg1) states,” We are now lucky that MPD is in one of it’s quiescent phases, but it will almost certainly make a comeback before very long”. Throughout the article Frances(2014) frequently displays his skepticism. Frances(2014) also exhibits his annoyance by …show more content…

The scholarly article contains the results of numerous studies completed by accredited psychologists, universities, and doctors. For most solid statements in the scholarly article, Murray(1994) offers a better sense of understanding to the reader by backing it up with evidence. Murray(1994) states,”The dominant personality may lack insight into the existence of other personalities.” (Murray,1994,pg1). In order for the reader to understand this thoroughly Murray(1994) implicates, “68% of MPD patients were unaware of the existence, whereas 86% had personalities that claimed to be aware of all alternative personalities.”(Murray,1994,pg1. These results were gathered from a clinical investigation conducted on 71 patients and administered by The American Journal of Psychiatry. Although the popular article lacks statistics and evidence Frances(2014) manages to give the readers a little taste of persuasion. In the second paragraph he states, “MPD was an extremely popular diagnosis when hypnosis was in Vogue 30 years ago.” (Francis,2014,pg1). This gives the readers an idea that the outbreak Dissociative Identity Disorder is the simple effect of a popular magazine. Frances(2014) then goes on to say, “Then emerged again 60 years ago when The Three Faces of Eve became a best selling book and hit

Get Access