Distortion In Doctor Strange

The way the film was presented was partially effective for the fact that the message of the story, for me, was not easily or instantly understood. This is a humongous deal as a result of if I was not able to understand it at an age of 15 then a great deal of children would not be able to understand that message. When I first saw this shot my reaction was “look an insane decrepit man” which is a great deal of people's reaction to the film, I'm guessing.

The image is brighter and sharper in the film. The contrast of the film really affects the mood. Since the contrast is so bright the viewer is bound to stay focused and aware because everything is so catchy and noticeable. Also, the exposure changes throughout the film. At the very beginning the film starts in black and white and changed to color as the story progressed. The filmmaker uses a lot of Long Takes, each shot of Dorothy meeting someone new is pretty lengthy.

Defined by www.news.artnet.com/, German Expressionism is defined as “an artistic genre that originated in Europe in the 1920s, and is broadly defined as the rejection of Western conventions, and the depiction of reality that is widely distorted for emotional effect.” In Nosferatu, the film contains a plethora of distorted realities in an attempt to evoke the “emotional effect” from the audience. This is shown by the director of the film, F.W. Murnau’s usage of lighting and makeup & costume design.

Tom Hanks who is the main character couldn’t believe his eyes. He was shocked that those cruel scenes were happening right in front of his face. Spielberg also stops the music and makes the screen kind of blurry to instill a sense of reality to the atmosphere. This definitely added more reality to the movie. Tim O’Brien said credibility might be threatened by telling an unbelievable story but this unbelievable aspect of the movie adds more credibility. The way he shot the film almost gives us a feeling that we were watching a documentary about war. These are the aspects Tim O’Brien exactly talks about in his text. Spielberg includes unbelievable aspect to his movie but he does not lose the credibility as Tim O’Brien states on his text.

In this movie, different filmic techniques are used, however, in my opinion, they are not very effective and thus it fails to improve or contribute to the success of the movie, which I believe it should. The filming techniques used in

It was in late fall 1974 when Daniel Garrison, the president and CEO of Optical Distrotion Inc., had asked his marketing vice president to develop a marketing plan for ODI’s contact lens for chickens. The lens developed by ODI was made to partially blind the chickens. The main reason of making this lens to the market is because it would reduce cannibalism among chickens. He tentatively hoped that the ODI lens could be introduced in at least one region during spring 1975, and that national distribution would be achieved by the end of 1977.

One of the ways why cinematography made the film was the lighting. To get the feel, the lighting appeared to be fake shadows that were painted on the set. The fake shadows that were painted on the set gave the lighting appeared to be harsh and sharper to set the mood for the audience. If it weren’t for the painted shadows, the movie wouldn’t have been so successful in the horror genre. Since it was a silent movie, if it weren’t for the shadows, you wouldn’t of seen it as a horror film, but as an original film that was trying to be creative.

point throughout this film was to make a impression on us, artistically. Not only did

Dr. Strange became a hero after he learned different mystic arts and additional power who made him a hero to save the community such as prevent Kaecilius and the dark dimension from entering the earth. He is one of the greatest wizard who can believe himself. Strange is a man with a full heart understanding the importance of wanting to help every sorcerer like he used to be by preventing mystical creatures and magicians threats. With using abilities he learned and discovered which caused him the strangest

Comparative Analysis on True Grit (1969) and True Grit (2010) Many modern adaptations of classical films have effectively been reinvented to successfully adapt the current market and cater audiences from the new generation. One such film is the 2010 movie “True Grit”, which is an artistic remake by the Coen brothers of the 1969 film of the same title by Henry Hathaway. While both films are adaptation of Charles Portis' 1968 novel True Grit, the two versions differ in certain cinematic elements that make their variations artistic and inventive on their own right.

The self is a very important concept in Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. The second self in the literary work is seen as primitive and demonic; the metamorphoses of Dr Jekyll into Mr Hyde reflect this idea. Utterson is character who suppresses his negative qualities and forces himself to keep them under control compared to Dr Jekyll who desires to separate these characteristics completely. Dr Jekyll’s reputable status in society plays a key role in his metamorphosis due to his extremely civilised self. Metamorphosis in Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde is a reoccurring motif and encompasses a relapse “from a civilised self to a more primitive self”.

The main element that made this film was the acting. It was necessary that all acting be overdramatic, it was the only way for the audience to truly grasp the emotions of the characters on screen. The best example is the scene where Freder wanders into the hall of machines and witness’ the

Like German Expressionist cinema, Lang is able to create something that may appear to be innocent at the surface and

Optical Distortion Inc. is a small new company, not yet in business, with a cash asset of $200,000 and a patent for an innovative new product (the only one) which is a contact lens designed to impair the eyesight of chickens. . These lenses are used instead of debeaking. Lensed chickens are more likely to survive. They also eat more efficiently than debeaked chickens. The key issue facing ODI is "How to market these lenses?". The analysis in this paper provides recommendations for ODI on their marketing and pricing strategy to launch this new product.

The films King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters and Wreck-it Ralph utilizes methods of realist and formalist aesthetics in their respective films. Realist aesthetics aspire to achieve transparency and display the content practically, while formalist aesthetics choose to communicate the content expressively to better serve the story. The realist aesthetics in King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters and the formalist aesthetics in Wreck-it Ralph are apparent in the film’s mise en scene, cinematography, sound, and performances. Realist aesthetics in King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters are applied in the film to emphasize the fact that a true chain of events is being depicted; realist aesthetics in the film accentuate the true nature of the story in order to emphasize the lessons and messages in the film are as prevalent in reality as they are to the characters in the movie. Furthermore, formalist aesthetics in Wreck-It Ralph uses the films aesthetics for the purpose of emphasizing the messages being related in the film. The realist film, King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters, leaves these various forms of aesthetics, such as using predominately diegetic sound, handheld camera movements, deep focus cinematography, natural lighting, available mise en scene, and real people (non-actors), for the viewers to further interpret. The formalist film, Wreck-It Ralph, implements forms of aesthetics, such as expressive mise en scene, expressive cinematography, expressive sound, and a deliberate