Distressed Property

Symmes purchase 300,000 acres of land only public land survey north to south east to west on magnetic

This is to invite your urgent attention to the constant garage and debris that has been accumulating on this site space 222 of Knolls Lodge Mobile Park in Torrance, California 90501 since 2014. For 2 ½ years this home has been an eye sore and a violation of the rental agreement at Knolls Lodge Mobile Park. As a result, heaps of garage, broken parts of metal, broken toys, washer and dryer, extension cords running all over the place, dry plants, car that is leaking oil on jacks, dog feces that is considered unhealthy, provides unsafe conditions and serious health hazards for the community, surrounding neighbors. I am the neighbor next door space 221 that has complaint that this resident has blocked my back door with these same obstructions

obtaining land for public use, but was to prevent harm to the public. The Court

The main legal issue to examine regarding this case deals with encroachment, which is simply defined as: A possessory right to the property of another that may be acquired by the passage of time. Crockett has well documented existence of the woodlot property dating back over 20 years and was not met with objection on the part of the Smith, who is the true owner. Due to the fact that the plantiff left the defendant undisturbed for over 20 years, he lost his right to dispute to object the encroachment. Smith would have had to make his objections known regarding Crockett’s occupancy in the log cabin, constructed on his wood lot, many years earlier if he wanted to maintain his right to object.

I placed both subjects on the criminal trespass log for future reference. Mr. Steven Counts and Mrs. Melinda Froelick both were advised that if they are caught back onto the property loiuterong

2. Possession over land is necessary to sue in trespass, and consists of “the intention to possess the land and the exercise of control over it to the exclusion of others” . Occupying land that has been built on, at the time of the trespass, satisfies this requirement . Therefore, by occupying the buildings on their land, Jim,

You have lived in your dream home that you designed for over twenty years. It is in a middle class tree lined family neighborhood. You have raised five upstanding children, two who are still living at home. You find out that a drug and alcohol rehab center has bought your neighbor’s home and plan on putting 16 people who are recovering from drugs and alcohol in this home. What is your reaction? Do you have any say in the matter? What do the laws say? Most of us do not worry about this situation or ever think it can happen to us. It can and it does. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act or the ADA guidelines a drug user who is currently participating in a

According to Ohio law, the person wanting to obtain title from adverse possession must have possessed the property for 21 years without the permission of the owner, but in clear knowledge of the owner ("Ohio Adverse Possession Laws"). There are four requirements listed to obtain a quiet title starting with using the land without permission of the owner. Then they must treat the land as their own, use the land in an obvious way and for a continuous period of time without sharing with others ("Ohio Adverse Possession Laws"). Matt Daman easily completes all four of these requirements. He never asked Brad for permission to clear the land and build a barn on Brad’s land, but did. Brad repeatedly visited and inspected the property in 1986, 1996, and 2002, seeing the barn but never saying anything to Matt. Matt appears to have also used the land for a continuous period totaling 21 years before requesting title to the one acre of land. Brad may have a defense if he had talked to Matt at any time about the property and can prove it, but it will be a hard case to win for him. Matt will win this case for a quiet title to the one acre of land with his barn on it because of the time that had passed with no objection or other claims of possession by Brad.

The Wakefield family cabin sits on a flat, level piece of land that is inconsistent with the small rolling hills, timber and corn field that our cabin and it’s ½ acre manicured lawn sits waiting for our family. The nearest road is a narrow gravel road that is not visible from the entrance to our property at any time of year. In fact, the only piece of the cabin that can be seen from the gravel is the streetlight placed in the northwest corner of the property to illuminate parking and the front gate, furthermore can only be seen from the top of a nearby hill.

Please note, that the acreage for Ted Burnat is not included on the SW 33-19-10-W4M access road, for which, he is an occupant.

The relevant title to sue is the person with the exclusive possession of the land . The action must be intentional or negligent , a direct interference and without consent or lawful justification . The intrusion must occur at a height which affects the potential use and enjoyment of the land , otherwise it is a nuisance.

The person may not occupy the land secretively or make efforts to remain undetected. The occupation must not be covert. It should be clear to any normal person who inspects the property that someone is using the property in sort reasonable fashion. In other words, if the titled owner were to visit the property, it would be apparent that another is making use of the land. Many states refer to “inclosing” the property within a fence. A landowner is not required, however, to have actual knowledge of the occupation. The person occupying the land must act as the owner by engaging in acts consistent with the property’s purpose. Such acts must generally be observed by others to be typical of that expected of an owner. The actions of the disseisor must change the state of the land (in the case of non-residential property, taking such actions as clearing, mowing, planting, harvesting fruit of the land, logging or cutting timber, mining, fencing, pulling tree stumps, running livestock and constructing buildings or other improvements) or, if the property is residential, maintaining the property for its intended use (taking such actions as mowing the yard, trimming trees and hedges, changing locks, repairing or replacing fixtures such as a swimming pool, sprinkler system, or appliances), all to the exclusion of its true owner. In Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that Cone failed to establish actual possession by occasionally visiting the land and hunting on it, because his actions did not change the land from a wild and natural

- This title also has an easement pertaining to right of way and sewerage drainage and water drainage

Considering the sense of control in this area; the territories are clearly marked with fences and walls surrounding the semi- public areas such as the playgrounds, pools and park of the lot. The territoriality of the lot and the way it is

The burden of proof is on the taxpayer to demonstrate that the purpose or intention was not to purchase the land for