Diversity Vs Human Diversity

Jopwell is a recruiting firm which connects the minority job candidates with the Tech companies in Silicon Valley. The main issue faced by the Tech companies is that the referral candidates are not serving the purpose and they can’t find talented minority candidates suitable to their companies. The companies are aware of the benefits like increased financial returns by having diversity in their workforce. Jopwell is currently serving 45 companies by providing them a pool of thousands of talented minority candidates and has been successful in placing a significant number of candidates in these companies. The company is focussing on diversifying the whole organization by filling the non-technical roles as well like finance, marketing,

The idea of race in society is truly that; an idea. However, one of the first things one notices about another human is their perceived race. Often, incorrect assumptions are made about a person, based on his race. In addition, many believe race can be determined by biological factors. However, there is no biological basis to race. Without a doubt, genes play a role in our skin, hair, and eye color; however, there are not certain genes present in an entire race and not another. Race is not clear cut; if one were to travel from either pole to the equator, a specific location could not be identified to separate any two races.

For that reason, professor Cohen also states that race does not control behavior like people say it does. He explains that race does not correlate to genes or skin color that control differences in “behavior of intelligence among human groups.” He then talks about culture and the way it works. In the article, it mentions that culture structures “our behavior, thoughts, perceptions, values, goals and cognitive processes.” Professor Cohen also says that students should be taught about significance of culture and revive the anthropological concept of “cultural relativism.” He claims that relativism means that people must look at what other people are doing and try to comprehend their behavior towards it before we judge it. The article concludes that teaching race in the form of “biological variation” results in the promotion of racism than when you teach it in the “cultural relativism” form.

One of the most challenging professions for African American males is social work. As a social worker, I have realized that I have to work under two domains. The first one is to work under the race identity and the second one is to work as a class identity. Although I am proud of being an African American, I usually feel sorry for myself being from unprivileged social class in the American society. The identity of being an African American male has affected my social work in many aspects. This is because it has made it impossible to carry out my professional duties because of negative perspectives and discrimination in the society. African American social workers are considered to be incompetent by the rest of the society hence making it impossible to delegate duties without any form of discrimination. This paper provides my own reflections as an African American male in the field of social work and how this identity has affected my practice in community work and advocacy duties.

In addition to this conclusion, I propose that our society can acknowledge variety of perspectives such as scientists’ biologists’ and cultural perspectives to change our misconception and oversimplification of race. It is common for us to follow the social norm. However, once we learn to be skeptical about what we think, what science tells and what our society comes up with, it will open up our minds to accept diversity and stop sticking with the social viewpoints of race which usually are negative or likely to separate groups. Although race will probably remain in our society, the important thing is that each individuals have their own aspects and thoughts on race. We should be careful to avoid misunderstanding what science tells us and abstain from misinterpretations of

According to Boyd and Silk, “race means different things to different people” (388). But is race something we can base of physical traits, or is more complicated than just looks? By examining evidence from the American Anthropological Association and Boyd and Silk, we can see that race is more than skin color. “The common view of race is bad biology” (Boyd and Silk 2015: 388).

This investigation is an exploration into the Kotch and Chernofsky family history. In which the cultural and historical background of each ancestry will be examined. Additionally, this investigation will also examine the paternal genetic lineage of the Kotch Family. In which the genomic haplogroup will be expressed through ancestral analysis and migration patterns.

Diversity to me means every race, gender identity, and culture being able to experience one an others differences with no judgment or criticism. Diversity to me also means equality and equal representation for everyone in the world. Also the meaning of diversity to me means people not making assumptions about a person whether it's about their race, culture or gender identity but just looking at a person and seeing them as a human being like everyone else.

Is a person a homosexual or do they simply identify as a female in a man’s body; is a lady African-American or does she simply have dark colored skin? These are two of the basic examples of how science and culture have differing opinions. In this work, I will examine the diametrically opposing views of science versus culture on human variation. The concepts of race versus skin color and gender versus sex will be the primary focal points of this writing. For the science perspectives, data will be used from the works of both D. Crocetti, who holds a doctorate degree in human something, and G.D. James who holds a doctorate degree in anthropology. These are both subject matter experts in their chosen fields of study. For the cultural

? The benefits to the workplace, according to the journal, Industrial Relations, include: increase productivity, and rise in profit

From the looks of it, he appears American as well. Anthropological ideas about the pattern of human diversity changed significantly during the 20th century. Before the second World War, Homo sapiens were generally perceived as a polytypic genus with biologically different smaller groups, or races. This biological diversity was believed to be the cause of long periods of independent evolution when each race was separated from the others.

Is a person a homosexual or do they simply identify as a female in a man’s body; is a lady African-American or does she simply have dark colored skin? These are two of the basic examples of how science and culture have differing opinions. In this work, I will examine the diametrically opposing views of science versus culture on human variation. The concepts of race versus skin color and gender versus sex will be the primary focal points of this writing. For the scientific perspective, data will be used from the works of both D. Crocetti, who holds a Ph.D. in Science, Technology and Humanities, and G.D. James, who holds a doctorate degree in biological anthropology. These are both

I believe diversity is composed of many different elements or components that make us very unique in our own way as individuals. Even though we are human beings, we are generally designed structurally the same way. We might be of the same race, color, creed, or nationality, but there is more that make us divers even within our own similarities. For example, two black men or white men for that matter might have the same color skin but speak two different languages.

In Richard Dawkins’ The Root of All Evil, Dawkins argues that religion dismisses scientific truth, and he also explains the detrimental affect that religion has on the individual and society as a whole. To sum up his argument, Dawkins says that religion discourages independent thought and ideas, religion is in direct opposition with science and is a set-back in progress, and religion is a dangerous utility in the hands of influential fundamentalist groups and extremists. (The Root of All Evil- The God Delusion) Additionally, many other critical thinkers such as Sam Harris, Stephen Jay Gould, and Christopher Hitchens support and contribute to Dawkins’ ideas. Dawkins has made a clear and convincing case that religion truly does more harm than good, and the costs of religion greatly outweigh the benefits.

diversity impact on workplace in positive and negative also. Effective communication is necessary for any business ,we can not company our message effectively without effective communication. In diverse workforce people have different languages. So that they fail in communicational issues .