Divorce Court Cases

There are lots of different types of families in today’s American society. Mine is a little bit weird. My parents got divorced when I was about 5 years old. My Dad re-married when I was about 8 and then got divorced again. My mom remarried when I was around 11 years old. My dad re-married again around the same time. It seems like in today’s society that more and more families are becoming split households. That is the culture difference between the USA and other countries. In the earlier years of the United States, many people looked down on divorce. Divorce was like a curse word to them back then.

Because the family court call themselves Equity not courts of law the spouses are misrepresented or unrepresented in the family divorce court because they encounter unfair outcomes from the judges, they do not have twelve honest jurors given the decision based on how they look at things, they do not have the rights to an attorney if they cannot afford one, if they do have an attorney it creates an expensive conflict between the spouses and all this happened ever since Ronell Reagan singed the first no-fault divorce

Surprisingly, this was not always the case. Back in the 1970’s women were raised to think the goal of life was to marry at an early age, raise up a family quick, and devote their lives to raising children and keeping their house in shape. The boss of the home was always the husband who worked and came back to a meal served and prepared by his wife. To some people, this may seem like an awful way to live, and many women believed this to be true back then also. Women now, and then were believed to be a man's “property”. Meaning that he tells her what to do and she does it. Also back in the 1950’s-70’s, divorce was a very complicated process which woman could not easily complete without the help of a lawyer. At this time, though women did not get any share of the money her husband made so there was barely ever a chance to get a lawyer because most women did not have the money for one. Today divorce is much easier for a woman because men usually share their income with their

As noted in an online essay published by the quarterly journal “National Affairs”, in 1969 when then California Governor, Ronald Reagan approved legislation for a no fault divorce, the institution of marriage changed forever. The threshold of marital dissatisfaction was no longer subject to the court’s jurisdiction. Consequently, divorce rates quickly jumped from roughly 20% of marriages in the 1950’s (Wilcox, 2009) to 38% today or approximately 1.6 million parents (“National Marriage and Divorce Rate Trends,”

Since times immemorial to the present, America has experienced incredible change in the family arena. Divorce was very rare in Colonial America. It was hard for both men and women. In Puritan New England, you could get a divorce if your spouse couldn’t have children. Most colonies granted what we would call "permanent separations" but neither party could remarry. Many men and some women "divorced" their spouse by leaving town or the colony. (Source: Making America: A History of the Unites States Volume a to 1877 by Carol Berkin) If the courts were presented with a divorce case, an assignment of guilty or not guilty was designated to either husband or wife and the only the person deemed not guilty was permitted to remarry as stated by Kay Pasley and Marilyn Ihinger-Tallman in their book, “Remarriage and stepparenting: current research and theory”. It is clear that society and church had

Divorce in the United States is governed by individual state law rather than the Federal Law. Also known as dissolution of marriage, it is a legal procedure which involves termination of a marriage by a judge or other authority. This process restores the individuals to a single status and allows them to marry other individuals. Other matters involved in divorce proceedings include; child support and custody, property distribution, spousal support and division of debt. Below is how you go about in filing for a divorce under the law of the United States.

Marriage was described by Lord Penzance as ‘an institution for life’, however the statistics show that there is an increasing trend in the divorce law. There has been a long history of reforming the law to its current stage. Until 1857 the only way of obtaining a divorce was through an Act of Parliament, however due to its expense, it was reserved for the wealthiest. The Matrimonial Cause Act 1857 for the first time created a possibility to divorce on the ground of adultery, which was gender-biased because wife had to prove aggravating circumstances in addition to the fact of adultery. Following it, the Matrimonial Causes Act 1923 allowed the husband and the wife to rely on adultery as a ground for divorce. The Matrimonial Causes Act 1937 created additional grounds for divorce, such as cruelty, incurable insanity and desertion. The divorce became more acceptable and therefore more couples decided to proceed with the divorce petitions and there was a need to remove fault. Consequently in 1966, both the Law Commission and a group convened by the Archbiskop of Cantenbury agreed that irretrievable breakdown should be the sole ground for divorce, which wasmentioned in the Divorce Reform Act 1969. This was incorporated into the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973), which remains the current law.

The idea of marriage has been significantly changing over the years, but one thing has remained the same, the increasing rates of divorce. In American the numbers are reaching close to 50% and the question we must ask is why? The first thing that comes to our minds that one person is unfaithful to another that results into a divorce, but that’s not always the case. Some of the things that cause a divorce can be just simple things like one of the two, or both, have lost interest in the relationship. In my opinion the most common causes of divorce are as follows.

The main change of that law, which has contributed to immense (tremendous, massive) variations, was that one spouse had the right to ask for a divorce without the agreement of the other spouse. (?passive) It was called as “Unilateral divorce”. Another adjustment (? passive) was performed in assets and partitioning of property on the chance of divorce. Until 1970s in case of divorce the properties between spouses (?passive) were divided unequally. However, after 1970s it (?passive) was decided to split up the estate equally. Statistics show that the divorce rate in the US is the highest compared to other countries of the world (Ellington C, 2003). Moreover, every year almost 1 million children become members of single-parent family (Ellington C, 2003). Unilateral divorce negatively affects their well-being in the future. It clearly shows that children from divorced family have lower attainments compared with children from intact families (Ellington C, 2003). In addition, Sampson (1996) states that cessation of family leads to a high proportion of looting and murder, particularly among minors.

In the world today, many men and women believe divorce is always a dreadful thing that occurs, but there is actually a beneficial side to it. Divorce has been around for many years and mainly just men were the only ones capable to make the decisions. Until, The Guardian states,” The 1857 Matrimonial Causes Act allowed ordinary people to divorce.” Under this new law, it was capable for women to make the decision, they just had to prove the facts to withhold a divorce. Following 1857, in 1923 there was a private member’s bill that allowed women to petition for a divorce for adultery. However, it only made it a little bit easier, they still needed to prove the reason. A few years later, they were able to pass another law, this law allowed

Divorce was not common during the 1850’s, and it was a last resort in most cases. Marriage during these times were a legal contract in some sense bounded by the state and God. It was always understood that a third-party was looming over a marriage making sure a matrimony was kept. During these divorce samples we can see the courts trying desperately to keep marriages unified. It often takes more than one trial for couples to achieve divorce and it may involve some lying to achieve divorce.

Over the past few decades problems have emerged in regards to the subject of divorce. Most of these problems focus on the notion that divorce is practically a sin and should be considered indissoluble. These absurd conclusions are essentially encouraged since “[o]ur divorce laws are rooted in the protestant concept of marital sin.” (Ehrlich, p. 174) However, times have changed and the horrendous reputation divorce has received should change right along side the changing times. The thought that all divorces are similar needs to be dropped, and the American people need to rise above past presumptions and educate themselves on the variety of options divorce has come to offer to struggling married couples. After all, those who are seeking a

Only a few generations ago, American culture rejected divorce as scandalous. Today, law, behavior, and culture embrace and even celebrate it.

Divorce is the legal dissolution of a marriage by a court. Today in our culture many people see divorce as a helpful solution to a troubled marriage. There are a huge number of people who get divorce nowadays. Only in the U.S, there is about one divorce every 36 seconds, which means about 2,400 divorces per day. These people get divorce sometimes for good reasons and sometimes for mindless reasons. People viewed divorce from many different points of view. Since it is a touchy situation, we need to be fair enough in making decision about it, and the natural law approach responds best and most strongly to the divorce topic because it has the belief that God made the beings, so it is fair and it is all about doing the natural thing which means

Through most of the history, reasons for divorce were really different from today, especially in complex societies. Divorce was considered as a male privileged act in society. In Rome, divorce was considered for the wealthy and elite class who were allowed to switch mates to acquire more advantageous in-laws. In that era, a male heir was preferred over a female heir. If the female was unable to give birth to a male heir, then the husband would