Dna Testing In Criminal Justice Essay

investigations both past and present. It can be used to identify criminals when there is evidence

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) has been used to analyze and prove innocence or guilt of suspects of crimes with great accuracy. DNA is part of everyday life. It is the heredity material in humans and almost all other organisms. While being part of an investigation. DNA has helped to solve crimes. There is a couple ways that DNA left behind can be tested to solve a crime. Either if the suspect has been caught and or had his or her DNA tested, or if he or she has left behind any biological evidence. Which then needs to be tested to see if it matches the DNA found in the crime scene to his or hers DNA. The result to this comparison may help establish if the suspect committed the crime.

According to researchers at the Death Penalty Information Center, from the years, 1973 to the year 1999 there was an average of about 46% exonerations per year. From the years, 2000 to 2007 there has been an average of 12% exonerations per year (“Facts,” par 5). I believe that this is a good thing, because with the use of science, we save more lives. However, there still are cases were innocent individuals get put on the death row because of an eyed witness, who accuses the wrong person of committing the crime. Like in the case of Jennifer Thompson, a 22 year old college student who was raped in her dormitory said, “I can identify the man who raped me anywhere and anytime” (“Eyewitness,” par. 6). With her visual memory of the man who raped her, a detective captured a man named Ron Cotton who Thompson identified as the man who had done wrong to her. She even confessed more than three times that she was 100% it was the correct individual they had captured (“Eyewitness,” par. 9). Mr. Cotton was sentenced to death row and remained in prison meantime. For eleven years, he spent his life in jail and had no choice but to look forward to the day of his execution, until the real man who raped Jennifer Thompson turned himself in and the case was closed (“Eyewitness,” par. 14). According to the researchers at the Death Penalty Information Center, evidence shows that 138 death-row inmates have been exonerated out of 7,000-plus death sentences since the Supreme Court

Every year the miscarriage of justice becomes an increasing problem in the United States, due to disquieting issues and crevices within the criminal justice system. Individuals such as William Dillon, have served protracted sentences for deplorable crimes which they did not commit. Over time, innocence group projects’ have exposed wrongful convictions through new advances in forensic science and reforms in the system. Among these advances, contains the evolution of DNA testing and the competence to apply the biology of the body’s cells to resolve crimes. This has produced meaningful changes in the criminal justice field, giving hope that freedom may be near for the wrongly convicted. Still, the battle has yet to be won for many innocent victims

There is no shortage of cases in which innocent people have been wrongfully convicted for crimes they did not commit and served an extensive amount of time in prison. The criminal justice system is not perfect. However, the goal of the judicial system should always be striving ensuring that no innocent person suffers for something they did not do. It is important to put more time and certainty in sentencing someone to death row, and later discovering their innocence is a risk that is not worth taking and importantly cannot be undone. The Innocence Project is a non-profit legal organization that is dedicated to exonerating the wrongly convicted people through various resources. The most popular method of exoneration has been through deoxyribonucleic

"Wrongful Convictions Overturned in Death Penalty Cases Due to Advances in DNA Testing." Historic U.S. Events, Gale, 2016. Research in Context, go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=MSIC&sw=w&u=leb32560&v=2.1&id=GALE%7CBT2359030480&it=r&asid=4a8dd1f41a5bdd51b4779bbbdcda8293. Accessed 28 Mar.

“Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country?” (John F. Kennedy). This is true to today the justice system is broken, and it is up to the people to fix it. People like the innocence project have come to realize how bad the used of evidence really is in our justice system. Often times people are sentenced for crimes they did not commit which could have been prevented through DNA testing. The misuse of evidence in the justice system is a huge problem, which can be solved by testing and using DNA properly.

Allowing the annual report of the National DNA Database Strategy Board as of 2012-2013, NDNAD helps the law enforcement in giving worthful information that will lead in determining the suspect and solve crime cases. However, sometimes the crime doesn’t solve and more evidence needs to be collecting to secure a conviction but in dealing with NDNAD it provides the police of its needed information for DNA matches.

The origins of DNA were first discovered during 1857 by Gregor Mendel the "Father of Genetics”, whom was performing an experiment of genetics with pea plants, and would provide a basic foundation towards DNA and Genetics. Friedrich Miescher and Richard Altmann in 1869 were also part of the first people to discover DNA. While testing some sperm of a salmon, they discover a strange substance that they would name as "nuclein", which is known as DNA. This new form of "nuclein" (DNA) would be found to only exist in chromosomes. Frederick Griffith, a researcher, found the basis on DNA, from a molecule inheritance experiment involving mice and two types of pneumonia. His findings were that, when virulent disease is heated up (to kill) and is

My DNA test stated that my origin was 37% Nigeria, 15% Benin/Togo, 13% Cameroon/Congo, 15% Senegal, 5% Mali, 3% Central Africa, 2% Asia, the only America 1% native America and other nation. Therefore, I always heard that my family was Irish, European, Indian, and a little black. Consequently, my DNA test last year contained 50% from my mother’s and 50% from my father bloodline; actual my color was very black contrary to my family who was light skinned. Furthermore, my family thought that it is unfortunate my birth was with 74% of African origin and 26% of another nation.

previously discussed that have played a vital role in what capital punishment looks like today in America. More recently there has many more reversed cases because of the fact of DNA. Many people that were on death row have been freed from prison because of newly discovered DNA evidence. These findings of innocent people have caught the attention of the Supreme Court Justices, political leaders, religious leaders, and even people who previously have supported the death penalty. Many people question the death penalty in light of these findings, they believe that maybe the death penalty is not an ethical choice for punishments because the risk of innocent people being put to death, and the fact that there is no way of completely eliminating

The first approach is to embark on advanced research on LCN to ensure that its reliability, reproducibility and validity are up to the task. The move will ensure that justice is achieved. Secondly, more research can be directed on the juries on how they handle DNA evidence. The findings will ensure that the juries acquire more skills on the manner in which the DNA evidence is presented and interpreted, and improve on their knowledge and reduce the “white coat syndrome”. An understanding of DNA evidence can be achieved through jury innovation trials that can considerably reduce the complex nature experienced during DNA and forensic interpretation.

In this book, Sheldon and Simoncelli list out concerns for DNA testing. They give background on how DNA databanks were first used for violent criminals and sex offenders, and how it has now changed into holding DNA of people who have not even been convicted. They explain how doing this can infringe on people’s rights. Sheldon and Simoncelli write negatively towards how much time and human resources it takes to re-investigate a case for post-conviction DNA testing. This book is full of information about what is wrong with DNA testing. This should be helpful to argue against post-conviction DNA

DNA is the future for choosing the right bull for your needs, but is it economically reasonable for the regular cattleman to afford this new technology and still make a profit. The information outlined in this study should impact farmers decisions of whether or not they should consider getting their bulls DNA tested for greater genetic gains that will improve their herd along with increasing their profit margins. The study was developed to estimate the economic value for using DNA information from hypothetical DNA tests associated with known proportions of selection trait genetic variation to increase the accuracy of beef bull selection in a seedstock breeding program CITE THIS SOURCE. This study used estimates to show that the math

“Since the 1977 resumption of capital punishment in the United States, nearly 1,100 convicted prisoners have been put to death in the thirty-eight US states where the practice remains legal. As of the beginning of 2007, approximately 3,350 people remain on death row in American prisons” (Ballaro). 1987 was the first time DNA evidence was used in a