Do Agencies That Facilitate International Trade Prevent Free Trade?Ef

Companies that produce in China for the overseas market, retailers, and importers clearly benefit from an undervalued Chinese currency, as well as from the abuse of workers’ rights. On the other hand, companies actually producing in the foreign countries – whether for the

China has become a perceived threat to the U.S. economy because of the increasing trade deficit between the two countries, their ability to undercut production costs of similar products produced in the United States, and the amount of leverage that China has over the United States due to amount of money that has been lent by China. Although the United States has taken steps to close the trade deficit, such as convincing China to raise prices on their exports, there is still a considerable gap (Prasad). The United States government continues to print money that they simply can’t afford, therefore, relying even more heavily on China sustaining the value of their currency. Unless the United States is able to close the trade deficit and regain control of our economic flexibility, the problems caused by foreign countries owning our debt will remain eminent.

China has seen massive economic growth in the past few decades. Since its reopening in the 1970s, the country has begun trading and buying foreign currencies with western nations like the United States. When the housing crisis which began to unravel in 2007 really hit the American economy hard, China was more than happy to step in and put up funding to help keep the American economy, one of its biggest customers, in a delicate balance. Unfortunately, the American economy has been incredibly slow to recover from the last major recession. As such, it has increased its dependence on Chinese funding to back American debt.

Again China cheap labors not only they are stealing American workers jobs, but they're also exporting their product to Americans on a daily basis.

While it is ideal to have free trade, which is trade without any restrictions upon it, it is not that simple. Instead, there are tariffs and quotas that prevent free trade. Tariffs are taxes on imports, and quotas are a limit on the quantity of a good that can be imported during a given time period. Tariffs and quotas exist because governments may prefer that their products be sold nationally more than another country’s products to help their own economy. Their own economy is helped because more jobs can be given to that country’s workers instead of another country’s workers. While quotas and tariffs may help boost a country’s economy, free trade allows for reduced prices, less inefficiencies, and increased consumption worldwide. With tariffs, the supply curve remains level as the price level never changes due to the extra-tax upon imported items. It should be

This is just one specific example of a company, but an example that is becoming more and more prevalent as companies seek more cost cutting measures to expand profits and improve the bottom line. The manufacturing sector that once was the pivotal and focal point of the American dream is being wiped out and transplanted at an astronomical rate. For example quoting the graphs from the future of manufacturing survey of 2009, companies themselves predicted that 25% of their products would be manufactured directly outside of the U.S. in 2012 and that’s up from 18% in 2009. This is a 7 percent rise in 3 years that will only grow larger as companies become more familiar and more efficient at outsourcing as a growing number of free trade agreements are reached and more information on the process of outsourcing becomes readily available and obtained. But where exactly are these jobs heading to? Again quoting from the graphs of the future of manufacturing survey of 2009, 59% of the companies said they will outsource their manufacturing to china by 2012 and that is up 9% from the 50% that said they did in 2009. 30% will outsource to India by 2012 up 13% from the 17% that responded they already do in 2009. As former Senator Byron Dorgan states throughout his book, China is the leading destination for American jobs with

For the past three decades the U.S. trade deficit with China has been growing. In 2013 U.S. trade with China was $562 billion, but resulted in a trade deficit of $319 billion. Nader states that the

The mechanism that first comes to mind when you think of free trade is the exchange of goods from one country to another. Although this may be true, but the free trade agreement allows international trade without any restrictions. Some US citizens don’t support free trade, however, it does have its ups and downs. Households have benefited from free trade in many ways. I believe that US citizens could make the same products that any other country. On the up, side it’s noble to have a free trade agreement since the US can use the resources they have there to trade to a country with their needed resources.

In America there is a strong wave of big corporations picking up and abandoning their American roots, and finding cheap labor in countries like China, Mexico, and Brazil. The rapidness of this epidemics begun in the 1980’s and over the course of 43 months 8 million manufacturing jobs were lost. If we do not solve this problem, we could lose the backbone that built American and the only force that could have the potential to build it back up again. Let’s face it, our economy is not stable, the national debt is outrageous, and we are loosing to these other countries. We have got to 1.) stop so many of our corporations from abandoning us and 2.) Bring our jobs back home.

The United States and China share the most imbalanced bilateral trade relationship in the world. The United States imports more goods from China than it exports to a tune of $202 billion dollars each year. All told, China alone accounts for nearly 26% of the

Free trade has long be seen by economists as being essential in promoting effective use of natural resources, employment, reduction of poverty and diversity of products for consumers. But the concept of free trade has had many barriers to over come. Including government practices by developed countries, under public and corporate pressures, to protect domestic firms from cheap foreign products. But as history has shown us time and time again is that protectionist measures imposed by governments has almost always had negative effects on the local and world economies. These protectionist measures also hurt developing countries trying to inter into the international trade markets.

China is on its way to attaining mega market status as a consumer of technological goods and services. Countries unwilling or unable to compete for a share of this market place put themselves at a substantial competitive and economic disadvantage. The admission of China into the WTO will greatly benefit many companies across the board in the United States. The potential for computer makers, software makers, internet providers and internet service providers are immense and American companies could gain tremendously from their potential. These benefits will not be limited to the big name companies of the United States either. Smaller start-up companies will be on the same grounds now and receive the same benefits as larger firms. The small companies will now be able to sell their products in China where as they could not do so before because of the numerous obstacles that only the larger firms were equipped to maneuver around in China. Thus all businesses working from within the United States will have the fair opportunity to extend their reach into China.

Wal-Mart’s business strategy relies on low production costs which it can pass on to its customers. If Wal-Mart were a country then it would be China’s eighth largest trading partner ahead of Russia, Australia, and Canada. Wal-Mart’s non-Chinese owned suppliers operating in China number nearly 5,000 and all of them benefit from a low valued yuan compared to the dollar. The 176 million worldwide customers of Wal-Mart also benefit from the low valued yuan. With nearly 70% of Wal-Mart’s products coming from China a sharp increase in the value of the yuan against the dollar can be devastating for the company as the increased costs for

Throughout the years, there has been a constant controversy over whether the World Trade Organization should enforce global free trade. The primary idea is to establish in which all are happy. Although there are many advocates for trade liberalization, as well as many who oppose. I believe free trade may be advantageous for both large and small-industrialized countries, but it does not favor the smaller developing countries needs primarily.

To comprehend the potential and actual effects of governmental intervention on the free flow of trade