Do You Agree with the View That Gandhi’s Campaign Methods in the 1930s Were Effective? Explain Your Answer, Using Sources 1, 2 and 3 and Your Own Knowledge.

Mohandas Gandhi’s methods not only led to India’s independence from Britain but also had victories over racial

Mohandas Gandhi was the first recorded individual to adopt a non-violent method based form for change. His primary objective was for people of all ethnicities and social class to live freely amongst each other, even those inflicted upon by India’s ancient caste system.

British rule was tough on many Indians. Gandhi, an Indian born lawyer, believed in freedom and peace for his people. He once experienced racism when he was kicked out of a train in Europe. He changed people’s point of view without breaking the law, which was tough for him. Gandhi made his nonviolent movement work through the use of determination, peaceful civil disobedience, and being a powerful leader.

In 1757, Great Britain extended its empire into India. This occupation would not fully end until 1947. In the time between, there were many movements by the Indian people to gain independence from the British. The movement that finally succeeded in winning India’s independence was led by one of the most influential figures of the 20th century, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Gandhi’s methods for fighting against the occupation of the British were very different from those of any of the freedom movements before. And that was why it worked. Gandhi did not agree with the general reasoning of the time: that conflicts could be solved through negotiation and forceful resistance.1 Rather, his faith led him to go

To start, Mohandas Gandhi's goal was to March peacefully and without violence.” My ambition is no less than to convert the British people through non-violence, and thus make them see the wrong they have done to India... but if you cannot see your way to deal with this evils and if my letter makes no appeal to your heart... to

Aroused by the massacre of Amritsar in 1919, Gandhi devoted his life to gaining India’s independence from Great Britain. As the dominant figure used his persuasive philosophy of non-violent confrontation, he inspired political activists with many persuasions throughout the world (Andrews 23). Not only was Mahatma Gandhi a great peacemaker, but also his work to achieve freedom and equality for all people was greatly acknowledged. Gandhi’s unconventional style of leadership gained him the love of a country and eventually enabled him to lead the independence movement in India.

Instead of using weapons to fight against the British army, he made statements that rallied people into protest. When the protestors did not use violence, the government had no provocation to use military force. When they attacked, they could not justify their actions afterwards. In a way, the British forces reacted temperamentally while the Indian protestors were convinced by Gandhi to remain patient and steadfast. It was not the threat of war or violence that manipulated the British authority, but it was the disobedient and uncooperative citizens that brought the nation to a standstill.

The Mahatma, inspired by Civil Disobedience, took nonviolent action against Great Britain’s rule in South Africa and India because the government unfairly abused its colonies’ populations.

Difficult days still lay ahead. Gandhi and his supporters would launch more protests in the 1930s and 40s and endure even more stints behind bars, and Indian independence would have to wait until 1947—only months before Gandhi was shot dead by a militant Hindu. But while the immediate political results of the Salt March were relatively minor, Gandhi’s satyagraha had nevertheless succeeded in his goal of “shaking the foundations of the British Empire.” The trek to the sea had galvanized Indian resistance to the Raj, and its international coverage had introduced the world to Gandhi and his followers’ astonishing commitment to nonviolence. Among others, Martin Luther King Jr. would later cite the Salt March as a crucial influence on his own philosophy

Throughout the course of history there have been many influential leaders that have stressed the use of non-violence and civil disobedience including Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Gandhi was a very influential and inspiring leader that was able to lead billions of people. He was willing to give up everything for what he believed in even though he knew that his actions could possibly lead to imprisonment and other legal consequences. Gandhi’s bravery and perseverance led to changes that affected and influenced the whole world and brought about positive change for people whose voices would have went unheard.

One of Gandhi’s greatest protests against the British colonial government was the Salt March of 1929 (Nojeim, 140). The nationwide protest against the tax on salt was organized in response to a denial to grant India the status of Commonwealth (Nojeim, 140). While there were many British taxes, Gandhi knew this particular tax to be especially unjust (Nojeim, 141). The salt tax exploited India’s poor because salt is used in everyday cooking, and yet the colonial laws had made it illegal to own salt which had not been sold or produced by the British government (Nojeim, 141).

The protests Gandhi organized moved throughout India and Pakistan. Although nonviolent they were effective for a short period of time until British authorities stepped in. Gandhi took whatever punishment they gave him as a result. Be that jail or a trial Gandhi just took it, inspiring others to do the same.

British control has lead to many rebellion of the Indian people. Even though Gandhi is a peaceful person, peace and nonviolence was the main thing stressed of hopes of independence from the British government. Examples are the salt march and the burning of the British made cloth. These acts of rebellion were held by Gandhi to show no violence but show their intelligence. The similarities between the salt march and the burning of the cloth, the meaning of the acts is independence. Gandhi led his people to a nonviolent action by burning the British made cloth. The salt march also led by Gandhi, the actions they have taken, India's voice and independence of are shown in nonviolence. In conclusion disagreements can be solved in many ways but one

How would you react if one day, people from another country came to your country and wanted to take over?, Would you try to defend yourself or even attack them back? Well that is how Indians felt in the 17th century, when the British came to their country and took over. The British created many problems in India, they took jobs away from them, food, resources, money, and even more. The people from India were angry, and wanted to resist them in a violent way. In 1869, Mahatma Gandhi was born he was a very knowledgeable man and a natural leader. He thought that the only way to resist the British was in a passive resistance, fighting without violence. Gandhi started to do great things for India, so people started following him. Gandhi influenced passive resistance, fought for independence, and helped in the swadeshi movement.

Making his debut on the political scene primarily around 1919, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi changed the course of India's movement towards independence permanently for the next century. The former British lawyer discovered his niche in government and leadership in South Africa, which he then took back to his homeland of South Asia. By pursuing his moral-based political ideology through the use of predominantly non-violent non-cooperation practices, Gandhi struck made impacts, both positive and negative, throughout the hearts of Indian natives across the nation. Supportive or crtical of Gandhi's beliefs and political methhods for achieving independence from Britain, the statement that Gandhi forever influenced political activism is irrefutable.