Do You Think Parents Should Be Punished for the Crimes Their Teenage Children Commit?

It has been understood by society that juveniles have been committing more serious crimes while the juvenile justice system had also become lenient with juvenile offenders. They were only getting a ‘slap on the risk’ as some members of society interpreted it, by the juvenile justice. This therefore led to a massive response from many state legislators who decided to enforced punitive laws to control juvenile serious crimes (Witehead & Lab, 2015) These laws have been enforced to prevent future juvenile offenders from committing serious crimes. Additionally some of the punitive laws which were implemented enable juvenile offenders who have committed serious crimes to be removed from the juvenile justice system to the adult justice system. Some also suggested that the justice system is to treat juveniles who have committed serious crimes as criminals within their jurisdiction in the juvenile courts. This they suggested will be as an example to other juveniles who intended to commit serious in the future to be treated as criminals and in some states prosecutors can file some cases directly in the criminal court than in the juvenile court (Lawrence & Hesse, 2009 Pg. 21).

The article “On Punishment and Teen Killers,” by Jennifer Jenkins, explains why teens should be punished as adults and how the media is influencing the youth to commit serious crimes. The author, Jennifer Jenkins, shares her case where her sister with her unborn child, were murdered by a teen with a gun. She explains that there are advocates who wish to minimize the offender's culpability simply because of their age. Jenkins add that in America, weapons are easily available to our youth, and that they grow in a violence-loving culture. She says that the Inuit people of northern Canada had no juvenile crime at all until 1980 with the introduction of television into their culture, which influenced the teens to commit crimes. Jenkins affirms that if brain development would be the cause of the teens to commit crimes, so then the whole world should have the same rate of juvenile crimes.

Between the years 1988 and 1992 the amount of crimes that have been committed and went from 18 to 68 percent in the United States. Also, between the years 1983 to 1993 the amount of youths under eighteen years old arrested for murder and weapons violations has doubled in the United States. In the article, it states, “ Most experts blame the increase on two things: guns and drugs. Guns are now readily available, and kids involved in selling drugs are much more likely to use guns than they were ten years ago, say police” ( John, 1). This quote is important because the easier it is to get guns and drugs, the easier it will be for people for under the age of eighteen to commit a serious crime. Also, it states in the article that kids are committing crimes and not caring as much because they know that they are under the age of eighteen and they know that they will not get as in much trouble as they would if they were tried as adults. But, if they were tried as adults the crime rate of kids under the age of eighteen would decrease in a huge way. That is another reason why juveniles should be tried as

Parents don’t have to worry about their children getting treated like an adult in the criminal justice system and receiving adult prison sentences. Making parents worry less and have less stress is wonderful for the entire community. Adolescents will get extensive rehabilitation in the form of psychiatric counseling, big brother programs and community service programs. Young people will have just human treatment so that they can become contributing members of society and not second-hand citizens (Karlin, 2017). Taxpayer’s dollars are not paying for adolescents in prisons, they are now paying for state college funds. This makes taxpayers happy because the tax money is going to help young people and it’s beneficial to a healthy society. The new criminal responsibility policy creates new opportunities for adolescents, who can look forward to a bright

Many children today are growing up without parents or some kind of legal guardian. When children do not have some type of support system to keep them motivated, more than half of them turn to the streets. Growing up as a teenager alone is very hard. They have no one to turn to, no one to talk to, help them when they need it, someone to just call a friend. Teens need some kind of motivation to keep them going each day. More and more teens today are committing crimes and being tried as adults. Even at the young age of 13. This review considers whether or not adolescents in the criminal justice system have a chance of success by acknowledging the following

There have been thousands of juvenile programs which have been developed and undergone comprehensive recidivism analysis by outside auditors over the past thirty years. Despite the good intentions of the late Judge Lindsey and other advocates, the collapse of the rehabilitative model can be attributed to: (1) the sacrifice of public safety, (2) not promoting the welfare of youths in the system, and (3) classifying youths as children in the regulation of crime (Scott & Steinberg, 2008 p. 83). Judge Lindsey and other progressives during much of the twentieth century believed in being parental role models, handling youthful offenders as neglected children whose welfare was of primary concern when the state intervened in response to their criminal conduct. The mantra of progressives and professionals for years has been that there are no wicked children, just inadequate parents or guardians; however, now there are psychiatrists who acknowledge that previous thinking was flawed and that some children, through no fault of the parents or their environment, are simply bad seeds (Appleyard, 2010). This thread will offer a brief synopsis of changes to the law in regards to juveniles due to the changes in theory and reality.

My first major reason for this is very simple, they’re kids. Their brains aren’t fully developed so they can’t make justifiable decisions like an adult would, it’s just unfair for them to be treated as adults. They’re not given the same advantages as an adult would for example a teen can’t vote, drive, and drink because they’re not as responsible and reliable like an adult. It would then only make sense that things

This paper will depict a subjective view of that teenagres should not be helf accountable for their crimes and infractions but instead should be placed in the proper facilities,

According to statistics, juveniles being tried as adults is not a new phenomenon. Since the beginning of the juvenile court, juveniles have been eligible to be tried as adults for the commission of capital crimes. However, starting in the 1960s and 1970s and mounting in the 1980s and 1990s, there has been an extensive upsurge in the number of juveniles tried as adults as well as a rise in research on the topic. This increase has coincided with the proliferation of laws that cover and dictate

Did you know that parents of bullies go to jail in California? Should or should not parents be held accountable for their children being bullies? Parents should not be held accountable because not all parents can watch their children all the time. Also some kids don't pick up bullying from their parents. They could pick it up from anybody!

Over the past several decades more adolescences are being arrested and prosecuted. Not only are more children being put the juvenile justice system younger and younger children are being tried as adults. In more recent years thousand of adolescences are being placed in adult court systems and sentencing them to longer and harsher punishments. Although crime has gone down significantly in America the number of juvenile offenders has increased greatly. Many people in our society today believe that children who commit violent crimes should be tried in the adult court system even though they are under the age of eighteen. Although these children committed crimes such as an adult, this does not mean they are adults and should be sentenced as one.

Notably, children of below 18 years old have a little understanding of the law. In most cases, these individuals commit crimes as a result of an inward or outward pressure. Hence, they should not be sentenced in adults' prisons without parole. For example, most of the eleven old children in the U.S engage in homicide crimes as a result of mental illnesses. Mostly, children suffering from domestic violence have a higher likelihood of suffering from stress and depression. Most of them drop out school and join the gangs in the urban centers. Especially, victims of divorce engage in drug and substance abuse because they lack the parental love and care. Henceforth, charging them without parole is unjust because the court needs to examine the motive of the crime. Additionally, sentencing juveniles in the adult prisons is a form of manipulation of the youths. Chiefly, charging individuals of 18 years and below in a similar manner with the adults is a form of intimidation and torture. Individuals of this age require care and love because they are the generation of tomorrow. For example, in the U.S, individuals of 18 years and below makes up the bulk of the nation’s population. Henceforth, in the future, these individuals would be ruling the nation. Thus, sentencing them without trail serves to kill their dreams and ambitions. Likewise, most of these individuals possess

Serious crimes such as murder, burglary and rape have raised questions as to whether the young offenders should face severe punitive treatment or the normal punitive measures in juvenile courts. Many would prefer the juveniles given harsh punishment in order to discourage other young people from engaging in similar activities and to serve as a lesson to these particular offenders. However, results from previous studies indicate such punitive measures were neither successful nor morally acceptable. Instead, the solutions achieved have unfairly treated the youths and compromised the society status (Kristin, page 1).

There are a lot of trouble children out there that do get in trouble. Parents try their best to do what is right to discipline their children and keep them safe. Sometimes it’s enough and children get in trouble with the law. When children get in trouble with the law I feel they need to be held accountable for their own actions maybe not be as easy on them as the law is now. But do not take it out on the parents it’s not their fault unless they are involved in the problem.

It may seem shocking that America has one of the highest crime rates per capita compared to other similar industrialized nations. Over the years, there have been many discussions and efforts in order to reduce this problem. Perhaps one of the more sensitive issues when discussing crime in America is the problem of juvenile crime. Recently, juveniles make up 3% of all felonies committed each year and 6% of all violent crimes (criminamerica.net). These statistics have troubled politicians for decades as they have worked to find a solution. Starting in 1994 the Clinton administration started putting stricter punishment on juvenile offenders, but it was quickly realized that this harsh punishment may not be the best solution. Various studies and programs put into action have shown that early prevention in a child’s life is much more effective and more cost efficient in reducing crime. Because of these efforts, juvenile crime has reduced 68% since the violent boom of the 1990s. In light of these discoveries, it is important for states to focus on these results in order to reduce crime.