Dodd Frank Case Study

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, was created as a tool of financial reform in the legislative package that was authorized by the Dodd-Frank Act, but the law specifically includes terms that prohibit setting interest rate limits, which is contrary to the 36-percent limit that the CFPB is currently trying to mandate as a universal limit on short-term rates. The specifics of the Dodd-Frank Act, according to the www.dodd-frank-act.us, state that the legislation grants, "NO AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE USURY LIMIT" unless such a limit is first passed through due legal processes.

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which is commonly referred as the Dodd-Frank Act. This act was passed as a response to the Great Recession in order to prevent potential financial debacle in the future. This regulation has a significant impact on American financial services industry by placing major changes on the financial regulation and agencies since the Great Depression. This paper examines the history and impact of Dodd-Frank Act on American financial services industry.

Dodd- Frank Act is named behind its drafters, Chris Dodd, a senator, and Barney Frank, a representative, who happened to be the chairmen of the Financial Services Committee and introduced the revised versions of the Bill in Senate and House of Representatives respectively. Dodd-Frank Reform is termed as the broadest and sweeping reforms on financial matters since the 1930s’ Great Depression. The Act was enacted in July 2010 following the 2008 global financial crisis (Erickson, Fucile, & Lutton, 2012). The US financial services are offered by: the credit unions and traditional commercial banks as well as savings and loan associations, which make loans to their customers and take deposits from them; and nonbank institutions such as the hedge

The role that the Dodd-Frank Act plays in the slow economic recovery from the 2008 financial crisis has many aspects. The regulatory and compliance component of the law helped to contribute to the slow economic recovery by adversely affecting the banking industry’s ability to provide credit specifically the community banks, ability to provide enough credit to the small business and start-up companies. The purpose of this paper is to show that there was a connection between the slow economic recovery and the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

While financial banks were inadequately controlled by regulatory agencies, there was a necessity for fresh policies to resolve these issues. Prior to the Volcker Rule becoming implemented, the crooked financial activity done at the time had affected the clients of the banks. The complexity of the regulations caused dissatisfaction for the clients and customers and eventually affected the overall business flow of the bank institutions. There was a strong need for new procedures and restrictions before the banking industry would have another breakdown and in the worst case, cause another financial crisis within the American economy. The biggest problem during this crucial financial time included how the banking industry was consistently earning large amount of money from these high-risk trades with the institution’s own

Passed under the Obama Administration in 2010, the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was designed in response to the Subprime Mortgage Crisis of 2008 which was caused in part by a gradual easing of financial regulations over the past several decades. The goal of the legislation is “to promote the financial stability of the United States by improving accountability and transparency in the financial system, to end "too big to fail", to protect the American taxpayer by ending bailouts, to protect consumers from abusive financial services practices, and for other purposes” as stated by the bill’s sponsors (FEC). The Act fundamentally changes the structure of financial regulatory procedures by creating, dismantling and consolidating certain regulatory agencies in order to streamline- and by some claims simplify- regulation of the banking industry. This piece of legislation has been the recipient of harsh criticism from both sides of the political spectrum for ideologically opposite reasons. Some critics claim that measures described in the bill cause economic stagnation as undue regulatory burdens are placed on financial institutions. Still others cite the bill’s shortfalls as evidence that it does not go far enough to prevent another economic collapse such as the one the nation faced in 2008 along with being highly bureaucratic.

The Dodd- Frank law on whistle-blowing bounty program is an upgrade from the Sarbanes- Oxley. The Sarbanes – Oxley whistle -blower program protected employees from getting retaliated upon by their employers when they report misconduct within the company they are employed. Dodd- Frank law took is a step further, an employee who reports financial misconduct are entitled to receive 10 percent to 30 percent of the fines and settlements if the conviction is upheld and the penalties exceed $1 million dollars (Ferrell, 112, 2013). The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was signed into law by President Obama in 2010 (Ferrell, pg. 110, 2013). The focal mission of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is to make markets for

The Dodd-Franck Act is one of the most comprehensive financial regulations of the last decades. Its main goal is to “solve” and prevent financial crisis in the U.S. Due to the characteristics and size of the Act, most scholars agree that the best course of action is to study and evaluate it in parts: The creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and its additional regulations.

While Dodd Frank was held as an act that would increase capital and liquidity buffers banks held and reign in the risky behavior of financial institutions. In doing so it has cost a heavy burden to bank in the form of compliance cost and implications about its future impact on households and the financial sector. Listed are the six key provisions of Dodd Frank, in each highlighted area the pros and cons of that key aspect that will be discussed.

In 2008, the United States encountered a financial crisis that left millions of Americans unemployed and resulted in trillions of dollars lost. The financial regulatory system was the main reason for the cause of the financial crisis by allowing financial institutions to operate with little or no supervision. It also allowed for lenders to use hidden fees and fine print to take advantage of consumers (Wolin, 2011). President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in response to the crisis on July 21, 2010, the intention of this act is to prevent another major collapse of the financial institution industry and geared to protecting consumers with rules to keep borrowers from abusive lending and mortgage practices

The Glass Steagall Act was passed on 1933, which is also known as The Banking Act to tighten regulation on the way banks did their business. This act was written as an emergency measure when about 5,000 banks failed during the Great Depression. Banks mostly failed because of the way they would invest with money. The act prohibits banks from investing money on investments that turn out to be risky. Banks could no longer sell securities or bonds. The act also created Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to protect the deposits of individuals, which is still used to this date. The FDIC in this era insures your deposits in your bank up to $250,000. This gave the public confidence again to deposit their money in the bank. In 1933

Final summation concerning this matter would be that despite its initial good intentions, The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Act is severely lacking in its claims to strengthen and secure the financial stability of the United States. If it is an actual fact and not an alternative fact that the Act itself has never been fully implemented during Obamas presidency, then it serves no purpose to our country. Much like the failure of the Banking Act of 1933, it is unsurprising to see the impending

In 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Act. This law requires certain companies to disclose their use of conflict minerals in their products. This proved to be difficult to enforce due to the loopholes in the laws that allow companies to be caught in legal limbo. If the company can prove that their product is conflict free, then they receive a certificate from the Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC). However, if the companies receive the rating of “Undeterminable”, then on their report to the SEC they must describe the entire process as accurately as possible. The company is not required to obtain a private sector audit, and after 2 years they are required to submit another report with no repercussions. This law is not strict enough,

In the past hundred years, the United States has dealt with and overcome many difficult situations. Many believe that those specific situations revolved around wars or terrorist, but the sad part is that, many of those difficult situations were cause by the people who are in charge of our country. The culprits behind these problems are generally greedy people who have access to higher power or are in control. Examples of those people are individuals in congress, the white house and many people on Wall Street. A great example of a difficult and unfair situation is how Wall Street killed this hopeful financial reform. A few years ago, Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Act and Consumer Protection Act. This Act was created so that the bad

Before the advent of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in 1933 and the general conception of government safety nets, the United States banking industry was quite different than it is today. Depositors assumed substantial default risk and even the slightest changes in consumer confidence could result in complete turmoil within the banking world. In addition, bank managers had almost complete discretion over operations. However, today the financial system is among the most heavily government- regulated sectors of the U.S. economy. This drastic change in public policy resulted directly from the industry’s numerous pre-regulatory failures and major disruptions that produced severe economic and social