Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Analysis

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which is commonly referred as the Dodd-Frank Act. This act was passed as a response to the Great Recession in order to prevent potential financial debacle in the future. This regulation has a significant impact on American financial services industry by placing major changes on the financial regulation and agencies since the Great Depression. This paper examines the history and impact of Dodd-Frank Act on American financial services industry.

ABSTRACT There are many analyses of the economic effects that regulations, in general, and Sarbanes-Oxley Act, in particular, have had on American business. This analysis looks at the effect that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has had on the American banking industry. The return on assets and return on equity were obtained from the Federal Reserve Bank for all SEC-registered and nonregistered banks for the period 2000

While there are many more provisions and over 2000 pages included in the Dodd Frank Act most of these provisions have yet to be implemented. The Know before You Owe Act and the Credit Card Act are two provisions that one can actually see the change and progress happening within these acts. These provisions are two examples on just how beneficial the Dodd Frank Act is and will continue to be towards consumers. This act helps consumers to understand and know just what they are purchasing and nothing is hidden so that brokers and banks can’t take advantage of consumers like what happened in 2007 and

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created in 2010 as a response to the financial crisis of 2008. The government agency was established by the Dodd-Frank Act which President Barack Obama passed as a means of controlling and preventing excessive risk-taking ("Wall Street Reform: The Dodd-Frank Act"). The financial crisis occurred in part because of the limited regulation of financial institutions and the wave of irresponsible mortgage lending (The Economist). Subprime borrowers with poor credit histories and insufficient funds for repaying the loans were allowed to borrow money which they could not pay back, thus in turn initiating a nationwide housing market crash (The Economist). Many of these borrowers were granted these loans because of the poor judgement of banks and financial institutions, thus the government needed to create an institution which would protect consumers against unfair and deceptive practices. The mission of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is just that-to protect consumers in the financial marketplace by enforcing federal consumer financial laws (CFPB, 2016). In order to achieve this, the bureau monitors the financial market for potential risks to consumers and supervises companies in order to uncover institutions practicing abusive and fraudulent acts. Developing laws to create a fair market place is a top priority of the bureau, as it works to enforce these rules and regulations and make them more effective. The agency also conducts

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is a mammoth part of financial reform legislation passed by the Obama presidential term in 2010 as a reaction to the financial crisis of 2008. The act's many provisions, implied out over thousands of pages, are scheduled to be taken over a point of several years and are intended to decrease various risks in the U.S. fiscal system. The act established a number of new government agencies tasked with supervision over various components of the act. There are so many provisions, such as financial stability, orderly liquidation authority, transfer of power to comptrollers, FDIC and Fed, Hedge funds, insurance, pay it back Act, and Etc, which contribute to better department and regulations.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, more commonly referred to as the CFPB, can trace its origins to the 2008 financial meltdown. Authority for the creation of the CFPB stems from the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which was named for the bill's sponsors, Sen. Chris Dodd and Rep. Barney Frank. The Dodd-Frank was aimed primarily at regulating banks, the stock exchange, mortgage lenders and similar high-value financial markets. However, the CFPB was also given the power to combat "abusive, unfair or deceptive" practices that impacted average consumers. It is this power that the CFPB has invoked in its war against cash advance loans and other small-dollar, high-risk, short-term loans. The war began almost as soon

On July 21, 2010, in Washington D.C., President Barack Obama signed into federal law the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, better known as the Dodd-Frank Act. The much criticized law, was passed as a response to financial effects of the financial crisis of 2007-2010 and presented changes to the country’s regulatory environment directly affecting all federal regulatory agencies and the financial services industry. The controversial law.

The new consumer protection with this law is that applications such as loan and credit cards must be easy to understand. For example there can’t be any “fine print” that is tricky or hard to understand and there cannot be any hidden fees. Next time banks take big risk and fail the government will no longer bailout them on the reason “too big to fail”. If the bank fails because of their business practices; just like any regular mom and pop store it closes and files bankruptcy.

Since 1933, the United States government has provided varying degrees of regulation designed to protect the average banking customer from the risks of investment banking. The Glass-Steagall Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, and the Volcker Rule were implemented to try to keep banks from investing consumer deposits into riskier securities but deregulation and lobbying have created instability.

Along with the greater profitability restrictions imposed on banks from the Dodd Frank comes the banks will for greater cost management, meaning job cuts. Already the Banks have begun laying employees off from burdening restrictions leading to this brutal method of retaining necessary capital needed for operations ("Wall Street Journal"). The bigger the bank, the greater resentment they have over this act. Their financial statements will have to retain a greater amount of compliance and transparency as well. Because of the large prominence of “shadow banking” and the concealed balance sheet elements that came along with this practice, the banks now are imposed with greater regulation to prevent these stealthy tactics of borrowing and investing. These restrictions, in my belief, will provide greater protection to the consumer but will also provoke institutions to begin innovating financial instruments to get around barriers, just as they did in the past with interstate banking and early consolidated services even before Glass-Steagalls act. The bankers oppose the act due to their cut in profits. Reduced outlets in revenue from specific revenue generating activities have been capped and larger expenses in order to comply with the new rules have also greatly cut profitability. The same notion is held with brokers. Because of the greater compliance costs served

The relative successes and failures of that Act are becoming more apparent with time, and the shortcomings are subject to intense partisan criticism. As discussed below, Dodd-Frank seeks to address the highly sensitive and controversial notion that Wall Street banks have been designated by the Federal Reserve as too-big-to-fail. In fact, during the most severe moments of the crisis, the voices of free market proponents could be heard advocating that these troubled big banks, suffering massive losses due to their own bad bets, and if weakened to the point of failure, should be allowed to fail. Hindsight shows that allowing just one to fail, Lehman Brothers, had serious and lasting detrimental effect on the US and global financial system and markets. Had Lehman been saved, it would have been the most effective agent to unwind all of the transactions and trades to which it was a party, and likely in a rapid manner. However, being thrust into bankruptcy, and thereafter receivers were appointed to unwind the business, took months upon months and vast resources to settle Lehman accounts. Had Citibank, Bank of America, Bear Stearns, or AIG been allowed to fail, it may have been possible that the US financial system would have melted down completely. So these super banks, and non-banks, cannot be allowed to fail in crisis, due to the system-wide risk. Notwithstanding, such an implicit assurance, that they will always get a bailout, no matter how toxic

The full name of the bill is the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, but it is mostly known as Dodd-Frank. The Dodd-Frank Act is a United States federal law, which is divided into sixteen titles that places major regulations on the financial industry with the purpose of restraining another major financial market collapse. The stated aim of the legislation is: “To promote the financial stability of the United States by improving accountability and transparency in the financial system, to end "too big to fail", to protect the American taxpayer by ending bailouts, to protect consumers from abusive financial services practices, and for other purposes” (Thomas, 2010).

The old saying the fox is going to watch the henhouse is some of it for same problems we run into with regulators regulating themselves. Part of the systemic problem that existed in the late part of the first decade of the 21st century were government entities known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Both of these government institutions would just as responsible as the banks themselves for the crisis that took place and sworn new regulation which may not be far-reaching enough.

Government departments are instrumental to a flourishing and secure economy. They are in place to serve their constituents and ought to keep that in mind. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) fits this well and is in place to ensure that bank users are protected in instances of economic downturn and that their money is insured. In this way, regulation is extremely necessary to ensure a stable economy in instances of financial instability. To completely understand the FDIC, it is important to understand why and how it was created, its history, major responsibilities and who the leaders are.

In the article, Senators Support Rollback of Bank Oversight by Andrew Ackerman, Ryan Tracy, and Christina Rexrode the authors identify various regulatory changes proposed by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Michael Crapo. The goal of the changes in regulation is to, “improve our financial regulatory framework and foster economic growth by right-sizing regulations” according to Senator Crapo. The biggest change would be raising the threshold for heightened Federal Reserve oversight to $250 billion in assets from the $50 billion it is currently. This would drop the number of banks with heightened oversight from 38 to 12, which the legislators believe will allow these banks to lend more. The authors’ say that it isn’t clear that rule