Does CSR Help or Hinder a Company’s Performance?

In recent years, increasing number of customers and businessmen start to concern about the ethical issues in businesses. Although the main purpose of business is to make profits, the social influence of it also appears to be focused by a large proportion of customers and businessmen. Corporate social responsibility (CSR), which is closely connected with this concentration, was put forward in 1953 with the meaning of interacting social, environmental, and economic considerations into the decision-making structures and processes of business (Industry Canada, 2013). Although criticized, there is a business case for CSR because it could enhance customers’ loyalty, improve

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is something that affects all companies and should be an active factor in the company’s decision making. It is something all corporations need to care about. CSR is when business’ or corporations take part in an initiative or campaign for a cause that will benefit society and/or in some way make the world a better place (Taylor, 2015). Initially, Corporate Social Responsibility started to take shape around the 1950’s, but some say that it dates all the way back to the 1800s, the idea of CSR was seen (Carroll, 2007). One may think that because it is dated so long ago, it doesn’t have an important impact today nevertheless, it is proven that Corporate Social Responsibility is a pathway for entities to self benefit as they are in the process of benefitting society.

As mentioned throughout the previous sections, Target has a very inclusive CSR program that covers most areas under this field. Because of this, there is little for the company to do in terms of expanding into any brand-new components of CSR; therefore, it would be most beneficial to fine-tune some of its programs to align with the company’s customer base more closely. Moreover, some of Target’s current CSR efforts are rather broad and the company could benefit by really specializing within some of the areas and establishing more detailed goals. Although Target seems to emphasize its dedication to supporting the community and collaborating with other organizations, there seems to be a disconnect between this and some of the company’s decisions.

The concept of Corporate Social Responsibility is a relatively new in the management field and there is no single definition of it since everyone’s interpretation of the term is different. “Corporate Social Responsibility means something, but not always the same thing to everybody.” (Votaw, 1972, p.25) and from my understanding of the concept, CSR to me is “The voluntary business activities within the boundary of law that contributes to the wider community for a more sustainable environment”. Since everyone has a unique interpretation of CSR, the range of relevant CSR practices across businesses has been quite diverse as there is no such thing as features of CSR (Marcel van Marrewijk, 2003). Rising environmental and social concerns in

Sustainability is vital for business, now more prevalent than ever before. With the growing global concerns over the environment, taking effective and necessary steps in implementing CSR will prove beneficial, protecting the environment while driving profits. Consumer awareness is the new growing trend, shoppers want a better, new and improved product, information about where these products were manufactured and how production effects the environment and the economic status of their community. We cannot continue to mass produce without regard to our social responsibility. In this paper, I will show why there is a need for CSR and how this affects the bottom line.

As corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts continue to grow within industries world-wide, the pursuit of sustainably responsible investment (SRI) is becoming increasingly popular among investors looking to create a positive societal impact. Similar to ethical consumption, an organization’s sustainability initiatives can motivate investors to not only provide monetary support for their company (stock holdings), but to influence their business decisions through shareholder advocacy as well (Voorhis & Humphreys, 2011). Therefore, companies who highlight and publish their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data are taking advantage of the increasingly popular market for SRI. In addition, community investing provides opportunities for investors to financially engage with communities directly in an effort to create social growth (Voorhis & Humphreys, 2011). Consequently, independent organizations and financial advisors are providing in-depth company research and industry examinations (screenings), which go beyond the financial aspects of investing and assist potential investors in their decision making processes. Within the power point presentation, a thorough analysis of both SRI and ESG factors are highlighted as well as their industry and investor significance. Furthermore, notable positive attributes of SRI are noted in an attempt to showcase its attractiveness along with specific examples of three corporations that have excelled in their ESG practices.

In recent years, there have been a growing number of companies that have an explicit Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plan. As stated by European Commission (2001), CSR is defined as “a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis.” It is believed that the motives for CSR are gradually converting from philanthropic rationale to performance-driven orientation, but the question of better company performance resulting from the implementation of CSR has often been the centre of debate. The purpose of this paper is to examine how CSR can positively contribute to company performance, which refers to the quantitative

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) emerged as a response to this new contexts and the necessity of companies to address effectively social pressures and prevent negative externalities, following a risk management perspective (Kramer and Kania 2006: 23-24; Carroll and Shabana 2010: 87-88).

The issue of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been bantered since the 1950s. Latest analyses by Secchi (2007) and Lee (2008) reported that the meaning of CSR has been changing in significance and practice. The traditional perspective of CSR was barely constrained to charity and afterward moved to the attention on business-society relations especially alluding to the commitment that a company or firm accommodated tackling social issues. In the early twentieth century, social execution was tied up with business execution. Thusly, business makes riches in the public eye and gives better expectations for everyday life.

Hot debates were arose everywhere in the society about the extent of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Mallen Baker (2004) states that CSR is about how companies manage the business processes to produce an overall positive impact on society. Supporters of CSR claim that Businesses and Corporations are not only about making money especially for big business. They should show social responsibility, moral standard and city spirits to the community. They should give something back to the society. Critics argue that Businesses are owned by their shareholders - money spent on CSR by managers is theft of the rightful property of the owners by

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a concept that means, when an enterprise generates profits and takes legal obligations to its shareholders and creditors, it should also be socially responsible for other stakeholders, such as employees, customers, community and the environment in which it operates. CSR encourages enterprises not only to pay attention to profits accumulation while operating, but also to make a contribution to consumers, the environment in which it operates as well as the whole of society.

The following report has been prepared with a view to understand how Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) works in the Brazilian market.

The topic of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has grown very quickly. In our century there are several strategies that companies are using to run their businesses. Population is demanding that companies take their social responsibility in a different way. A lot of companies have started to get in involve in CSR as a strategy in order to obtain benefits that can give them a competitive advantage. There is an increasing number of companies and a tendency of CSR involvement to run their businesses. Statistics are showing that implementing a correct CSR can help companies to succeed in business by increasing brand awareness and sales volume.

The following sections present a broad evaluation of the history and progress of CSR practices. Additionally, it provides a, in-depth review at the predominant theories behind globalisation, the need for sustainable development, stakeholder progression, various critics and methods to overpower them. A consideration is also given for the implementations of codes of conduct, the role of MNCs and weak government bodies and corporate performance.

Problem - In today’s society, there is a growing interest in, and demand for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Reasons for this can be multinational corporations’ increasing