Does Gender Have An Effect On Memory?

How is memory encoded and what methods can lead to greater recall? There have been many different models suggested for human memory and many different attempts at defining a specific method of encoding that will lead to greater recall. In this experiment subjects are asked to do a semantic task on a word related to them and an orthographic task in which they analyze the letter in the word. The results of the experiment indicate that the words which where encoded semantically and are related to the self have greater recall.

Anyone reading Joshua Foer’s “The End of Remembering” can assume that he knows a lot about the brain and how it works. After all he graduated from Yale in 2004, and later went on to become the 2006 United States Memory Champion. With Foer’s interest in mental athletes he decided to do a journalism project to study them. This project would end up being the result of his book, Moonwalking with Einstein: The Art and Science of Remembering Everything from which “The End of Remembering” is one of the chapters. In this chapter Foer’s lays a solid foundation of the development of writing. He also includes historical views of remembering and how we learned in terms of our memory. Foer not only gives historical views but supports his claims with science

George A. Miller, one of the founders of cognitive psychology, is considered a pioneer who recognized that the human mind can be understood by using an information-processing model. Miller was also a leader in the story short-term memory. In Miller’s most famous article, “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two” remains one of the most frequently cited papers in the field of psychology. In his article, Miller proposed that short-term memory is subject to certain limits, including the span of information that can be stored at a given time. provides evidence for the capacity of short term memory.

The combined findings provide the foundation for the hypothesis that there is more than one kind of memory, or rather that skill-based memories must be organised differently from fact-based memories since the former seem to be preserved in amnesia as opposed to the latter.

Memory in the human brain is a complex process which is easier understood by the use of theoretical constructs. Memories begin as sensory stimuli which become sensory memory which only last about one second, from there it moves into working memory which lasts for about twenty to thirty seconds and is used to process information. Within working memory there are a few separate processes, the central executive which directs attention, the episodic buffer which is a secondary storage lasting ten to twenty seconds, this area communicates with long term memory as well as the central executive. The visuospatial sketchpad which is used to visualise visual and spacial

Memory – what it is, how it works, and how it might be manipulated – has long been a subject of curious fascination. Remembering, the mind-boggling ability in which the human brain can conjure up very specific, very lucid, long-gone episodes from any given point on the timeline of our lives, is an astounding feat. Yet, along with our brain’s ability of remembrance comes also the concept of forgetting: interruptions of memory or “an inability of consciousness to make present to itself what it wants” (Honold, 1994, p. 2). There is a very close relationship between remembering and forgetting; in fact, the two come hand-in-hand. A close reading of Joshua Foer’s essay, “The End of Remembering”, and Susan Griffin’s piece, “Our Secret”, directs us

In addition, in class we discussed how our memory is reconstructive since it constructs memory during the time of retrieval while it blends our information of memories together. Second relevance to cognitive psychology is that Hoffman also explained that we often misinterpret our perceptions when he talked about that in the past that we thought that the earth was flat until Galileo proved them wrong that brought Galileo to a conclusion by saying that smells, colors and taste reside in consciousness. Likewise, the studies shown in class which were the Brown and Kulik and Talarica and Rubin studies that talked about flashbulb memories that deal with triggering memories and how they are often forgotten when asking a person to retell what they experienced. Comparatively, a person who experienced the event may recall a few things, but most of the time they are a lot of errors that leads to the filling in the gaps of what is perceived or

As Elizabeth Loftus describes in her book Memory: Surprising New Insights into How We Remember and Why We

Herman Von Ebbinghaus tested his experiments using himself as the only participant because he was not a wealthy man and could not afford to pay subjects. He was interested in learning about memory, both how we acquire new memories and how they fade. Since he knew from the beginning that certain words would be easier to remember due to personal experiences and associations, he created three-letter words that did not exist and that meant nothing to him. This lack of connection was essential as it removed any previous association which would make these words easier to remember. Ebbinghaus studied twenty words by reading them out loud and testing himself, repeating the process until he remembered all twenty of them. Once he forgot the words he

Loftus and Palmer support the reconstructive memory hypothesis. They believe that information gathered at the time of an icident is

I am testing the brain of female and male mice memory. I plan to have an answer to which is smarter. I think this will lead to which human is smarter. So if I take two mice and place them several mazes that change time how fast each gender can go through it in the fewer amount of time and recognize a winner then explain how I got the information on which gender I thought would win the race. I think the female will finish the race in fewer seconds than the male.

Hermann Ebbinghaus was a psychologist who pioneered the experimental study of memory. Ebbinghaus was famous for the discovery of ‘the forgetting curve’ and ‘the spacing effect’. Ebbinghaus was as well the first person to describe the learning curve. As for what Ebbinghaus demonstrated from his research was he randomly selected a sample of syllables, practiced them, and tested himself. He would get his experiments, rapidly read them aloud, eight times over, then look away and try to remember the list; by doing this he also realized that those who learn quickly also forget quickly.

​Historically, men have displayed a stronger spatial memory than women ("Sex Differences in Memory"; Loftus et al. 82). What this means is that men are generally better at remembering things such as where the car is parked, driving directions (Loftus et al. 71) and, as exemplified in "Sex Differences in

Men are better at memorizing words associated with their interests, like baseball or car. So obviously, gender does affect memory, but just does not work as what we predicate. It seems like people are more capable of memorizing the term that related to cue socially defined roles and objects assigned to those roles. Klucken stated, “Pants are now ‘masculine and feminine’ whereas once pants were only male. We learn things that are culturally acceptable very quickly, especially in more urban areas as social interactions generally occur more often. The more times you are told ‘this is for boys, that is for girls’ the more likely you are going to associate that object with the gender society assigns to it, and it's importance in general and for that gender role.” So does it mean for short-term memory women will primarily remember the feminine objects but men will more easily remember the masculine objects?

Through processing, chemistry, structural differences, blood flow and brain activity. Male and female brains process the same neurochemicals but to different degrees and through body brain connections and different genders. The structure of the brain in both genders is very different, and the way it functions in the body. Since men have larger brains they are said to be smarter and more intelligent, while that is not true. The way a man's body was built allows him to have a larger brain and maybe surpass females when performing physical tasks, however, when it comes to actions and emotions females outbalance males as they are more evolved mentally. The female brain tends to strive more for connection, and investigates scenarios in a much deeper meaning than the male brain. It can be concluded that through chemical and mental aspects the female brain is rather superior than the