Does Nature Or Nurture Affecting Children's Behavior?

The nature-nurture debate has been around for decades. It is one of the oldest and most popular topics in the history of psychology asking what makes people who they become and how they behave and develop the way they do. What makes the debate more interesting is that now scientists are asking if personality traits and even sexual orientation can be determined by what is in already there from conception. Bodies are built up of chromosomes which contain genetic information. Many of these are inherited from parents and relatives. The nature side of the debate states the way people are is predominantly from inherited genetics and other biological factors not so much the environmental factors. The genes humans have in their bodies play a huge role to many aspects of who they are and who they become. For example, hair colour, eye colour and height are all predetermined by genes. Unchangeable. This is natures way. The argument stands to decide whether most attributes do stem from nature, genes, or if they can be affected by the environment and the way people are nurtured as they have grown. The nurture side of the argument believes although humans do have the genes and traits with which they are born, most personality traits are being made up of environmental factors. For example, being loved and cared for as children, if parents or carers were positive role models and if those people were taught in ways which provided them with discipline and respect for others. Where nature

One of the main, and most controversial topics discussed in a child’s development is, nature vs. nurture. Nature pertains to genetic influences that a child has inherited from their parents, such as traits, abilities, and capacities. For instance, what color eyes the child may have, how athletic they may be, and even their brain development. Whereas nurture, refers to the environment the child is raised in and how this shapes their behaviors. Such factors can include, the family’s socio-economic status, schooling, parental discipline, as well as whether the child is provided with enough resources. When it comes to nature or nurture having a stronger influence then the other, the answer is both, nature and nurture, influence the outcome of the child. This idea that both nature and nurture, play a part in how the child will develop, is known as the nature-nurture continuum.

There is a debate occurring in the world of psychology revolving around the way people’s behavior is based on either nature or nurture. Both of these, again, deal with psychology and are both aspects of behavior that are products by one of two realms. One being inherited through genetics and the other

One of the lucrative activities that many colleges use are their sports. Just as their professional counterpart, crowds of people pay to see their favorite team, or in this case college, go against a rival team. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), reportedly made billions of dollars in revenue off college sports. Though, this aroused a serious issue, as none of the college athletes, the ones who made such a revenue possible, never received any of the profit. As college sports grows ever more popular, should they start paying their athletes? The answer is yes they should for the athletes as they put a lot of work, many of them live in poverty, and colleges makes profit

When a child begins to grow, the parents may notice traits that are not “good” in their opinion. Some parents notice their kids having “bad” traits and will blame themselves. However, the Nature Theory expresses that good or bad traits can be caused by ‘biological genes that are predetermined at birth’ “Nature vs Nurture”. Other theories like Albert Bandura’s social learning theory, explains that “behavior is learned from the environment through the process of observational learning”( McLeod). Bandura believed that children are surrounded with many influential “role models”. Children then use these models as “examples of behavior to observe and imitate”(McLeod). At a young age children are mimicking and copying parents, siblings, and family. When copying their models, they either get rewarded or punished depending on the acceptance of their actions.. When rewarded, the children are more likely to repeat that action or one similar to it. As a result, the positive reinforcement from their environment shapes their personality and molds them into the person they will eventually become.

Nature versus nurture has been a continuing debate and is far from being settled. Whether or not our characteristics are determined by the environmental factors that surround us or they were imbedded in our genes is a question many scientists will argue. The challenge concerning the debate is that it is difficult to know if someone is born with traits or whether their environment affected them. It is unethical to take a child out of its natural surroundings to test nature versus nurture, so identical twins have become the most reliable test cases for finding the answers of what is learned and what is inherited.

Nature combines with nurture to form our personalities. Our genes may predispose us for certain inheritable traits such as diseases like cystic fibrosis or even just irritability, similar to our relatives, but the environment we are raised in has quite a bit to do with how visible certain aspects of our personality become. If a child is always around an environment where there is constant arguing and yelling going on, the child may naturally feel that is the proper thing to do when things do not go as they would like. Likewise, genetics play a role in determining a person's body type, thus you could get your eye color from your mom, and your height from your dad.

Nature plays a huge part in our lives. It is believed we are born with these characteristics. Over the course of our lives these features will come across us and the people around us. The same article argues that “children brought up in a ghetto environment tend to score lower on tests because they are denied the same life changes as a more privileged members of society”. This section agrees with nurture. If a person is raised in a family where beliefs, values and morals are high expected their way of thinking will have a positive impact on their life. This will be reflected in their behavior. It may be the opposite of a person who was never thought values and morals. There is not an accurate answer for the nature and nurture debate as of now. Many believe is a combination of the two. A section from our textbook implies that “psychologists

The age-old question of whether nature or nurture determines a person’s behavior seems finally to have been decided slightly more in favor of Mother Nature. A gene is only a probability for a given trait, not a guarantee (Underwood, 1997). For

Nature versus Nurture is a wide spread topic that many psychologist study. Nurture is the environment, while Nature is genetics.

Is child development and learning affected by both nature and nurture? This is a world-wide phenomenon that is pathing the way to many healthy debates from human beings of all socio-economic status around the globe. Yes, both nature and nurture factor into child development in such immense ways, but when thinking about what is the makeup to child development, which influence plays a more significant role in that theory, or are they on equal playing fields. Nature and nurture work simultaneously to address the physical, emotional, relational, intellectual, and spiritual aspects of a child's life, but if we decode the whole child and lay out the concrete steps to child development there are more key and important rudiments submerged into nurture.

Some people believe that nature and nurture are the same thing, but in fact they are actually completely different. While the behaviors that result from both may be similar, the reason and explanation behind these influences comes from a very different place. Nature versus nurture is an ongoing debate among individuals that study psychology. There are behaviors that are given through genetics and “nature” that make us unique, while nurturing from our environmental elements can make a difference in the quality of our performance.

The debate on nature versus nurture is an old philosophical issue in psychology. Nature involves all genes as well as hereditary factors, which influence who we are. These range from the physical appearance to the personality features of a person. Nurture involves all environmental variables, which determine who we are: experiences during early childhood, how one is raised, the surrounding culture, and one’s social relationships. Biological psychology today insists on the significance of genet is as well as biological influences. When it comes to behavioral psychology, the most important thing is how the environment affects behavior. Unlike earlier when debates on relative contributions of the concept took a one-sided approach, experts currently

Throughout history it has been seen through scholarly research that a child’s development has been based on nature or genetics. That we all have

At the center of the issues of what influences child development, would be the controversy between nature versus nurture . Nature and nurture are two major influences on development. Over the years there had been a lot of researches , for nature and nurture and the influence on children’s development that has been known for the lead census of the developmental and psychology that shoes the importance of both genetics and the environment. (Monographs of the society for Research in Child development, 2007). Even though nature versus nurture does play a big role in child development , nurture seems to be just a little bit