Does Nature Or Nurture Affecting Children's Behavior?

Nature combines with nurture to form our personalities. Our genes may predispose us for certain inheritable traits such as diseases like cystic fibrosis or even just irritability, similar to our relatives, but the environment we are raised in has quite a bit to do with how visible certain aspects of our personality become. If a child is always around an environment where there is constant arguing and yelling going on, the child may naturally feel that is the proper thing to do when things do not go as they would like. Likewise, genetics play a role in determining a person's body type, thus you could get your eye color from your mom, and your height from your dad.

Once a child is born and their development continues, then starts the controversy and wonder as to whether how the child is raised effects their outcome in adult hood, or whether they are just born to be a certain way. Child psychology looks into the many different factors that affect

Nature and nurture are usually seen as very different things, but they are actually somewhat similar and even integrated. There is a huge debate over which holds more influence over how people develop and whether they behave based on genes or their environment. In Sincero’s article Nature and Nurture Debate she discusses arguments for both sides, saying behavior may be completely in a person’s genes, or it could come from experience and influence. Many people believe “that the criminal acts, tendency to divorce and aggressive behavior causing abuse can be justified by the ‘behavioral genes’” (Sincero). These genes are said to be the reason that people behave as they do and one cannot help their own actions. Other arguments suggest “that genetic influence over abstract traits may exist; however, the environmental factors are the real origins of our behavior. This includes the use of conditioning in order to induce a new behavior to a child, or alter an unlikely behavior being shown by the child” (Sincero). Environment is a key role in determining how a person is developed, even if genes lay the foundation for personality. However, not only are both very important in influencing behavior, but they also incorporate each other, as part of natural instinct is to prosper and grow, which includes nurturing and protecting others. The importance of nature and nurture in the development of a person as well as their importance within each other contribute to many different situations

Alyssa English AP Psychology Mr. Myers 8-22-15 Behavior Genetics “A born devil on whose nature nurture can never stick,” says Prospero in Shakespeare’s play The Tempest(Smallman). Even Shakespeare questioned what traits came from nature and nurture. This argument goes back hundreds of years ago where famous philosophers such as John Locke, Francis Galton, and Thomas Hobbes have researched nature vs. nurture, and no one can seem to agree on one answer. Behavior Genetics is one of the most talked about subjects in Psychology. Most of the world knows it as the debate of Nature vs. Nurture. Now psychologists are not arguing about which side is right, they are arguing about which side influences characteristic traits more. The question is, does

I believe that nurture has a lot to do with the development of a human, but nature has a larger impact in determining personality traits and the make up of a person. A human is born with certain characteristics and even though their nurture may influence these characteristics to change or be enhanced, their genes have a large influence on how they will live their life.

Wickelgren (1999) explains that nurture can effect a child’s intelligence for better or worse and the nature does not matter.(Pg1 ) Even though the child might have the possibilities to develop well in a particular area this could be altered by their environment and the opposite would occur, For instance a child whose parents or parent are a math teacher the child could perform poorly if the parents did not take the time to talk to him or even spend much time with the child. The child might do poorly in all the areas of academics because the parents slacked in talking and not giving the child enough of

This perspective is contrasted by research evidence, however tests on identical twins suggest that environmental influences have a big effect on child development. Epigenetic studies have shown that “genes, though still important, have lost their privileged and prominent status, particularly as the distinction between nature and nurture disappears” (Keller, 2010). However, strong evidence is emerging to show that nature and nurture are interrelated in complex ways (Plomin, et.al,2013), and therefore they emerge together in the development of an individual

The nature-nurture debate has been around for decades. It is one of the oldest and most popular topics in the history of psychology asking what makes people who they become and how they behave and develop the way they do. What makes the debate more interesting is that now scientists

How does Nature and Nurture Influence Development Scientist and Psychologist have long debated which of the two, nature or nurture, plays a bigger role in human development. My opinion is that neither is more influential than the other. Rather, there is evidence that states both are equally important in forming who we are as a person.

Nature versus nurture is a psychology term related to whether heredity or the environment most impacts human psychological development (Huffman, 2012). Providing Dr. Money’s theory was much more difficult than people might realize. In many cases he was prove wrong with his theory in most children.

Humans are unique and intricate creatures and their development is a complex process. It is this process that leads people to question, is a child’s development influenced by genetics or their environment? This long debate has been at the forefront of psychology for countless decades now and is better known as “Nature versus Nurture”. The continuous controversy on whether or not children develop their psychological attributes based on genetics (nature) or the way in which they have been raised (nurture) has pondered the minds of psychologists for years. Through thorough experiments, studies, and discussions however, it is easy to see that nurture is far more important in the development of a human than nature.

Is nature responsible for the way children think and behave, or is it due to the way a child is nurtured? Scientists and psychologists have been debating the subject of nature versus nurture for decades. The term “nature” refers to heredity, or the genetic traits passed down from parent to child (Powell, 2010). Researchers all over the world attempt to prove that genetics is the sole explanation of a child’s intelligence and personality. Human DNA determines traits such as eye color, nose shape, and hair color. While a child’s DNA can determine his or her risk of Down Syndrome, heart disease, or cancer; there is not significant proof of DNA determining personality traits (Heredity, 2011). The nurture side of the argument refers to a

The Social Birth Order Theory In the world of psychology, nature versus nurture is a common theme theorists attribute to differences in the personalities of children. However, there may be other influences that have greater impact early in life. When it comes to the disposition of a person, the order

Nature vs nurture is, understandably, one of the longest on-going debates in psychology history. Though many different views on the matter, I believe they both play off the other. That the impact of genetics is greatly based on their environment. With the many possible environments, determining the actual impact of genetics is near impossible. But genetics can still overcome environment, despite what it is. Seen in family lines with long history of certain mental

Many people argue over this topic nature vs. nurture. According to GoodTherapy.org, whose purpose is advocating for ethical therapy, states that “The modern debate often centers around the effect genes have on human personalities as opposed to the influences that early environment and development might have.” People are looking more at the influence of behavior caused by our genes rather than the environment we are surrounded by. The environment we are surrounded with is a huge factor on how we are going to act or behave.