Fr. Arrupe calls for a different take on emotions such as love by saying that a person should not only love everyone unconditionally but also try to aid others by promoting justice and equality for all. He doesn’t want people to be filled with hate or only care about themselves. Nussbaum also has a similar take on love where a complete love of people calls for justice and equality for everyone. I think Nussbaum quote “embracing imperfection while striving for justice to embrace one another and enter a common future”(Nussbaum, p.393) best describes political love in that while the world is not perfect right now we must take small steps to improve the world to truly create a better world for everyone. Dissent from multiple sources is also needed
The idea of universal love is one that is prevalent in the media. With the news filled with grim stories and horror many people are calling to the idea of loving everyone. Tensions are high concerning race relations, gender discrimination, and sexual orientation. Many in the general public are calling for humanity to embrace humanity. Many in the general public are asking “why we can’t just love one another”? Stephen T. Asma tackles this idea of love in his article published in the New York Times. Asma discusses two different ideas about universal love before offering his own take on the subject. Just as Asma states, universal love is a myth and closer personal relationships should be favored.
bell hooks in “Love as the Practice of Freedom” explains thoroughly as to how love is the form to be liberated. Without any love society is blind and continues to practice systems of domination without being aware. However the community should look out for one another not just when a problem impacts an individual. Everyone must be aware of the systems of domination- imperialism,sexism,racism, and classism to create change. When radical love is comprehended it allows the destruction of oppression,exploitation and there is liberation
How is a human suppose to love? Love is just a statement, a word, a word is just a sound. When you really love something, in loves you back in whatever way it has to love. But what if that love isn't good enough? Doesn’t meet your standards? "‘What I mean is, I love winter, and when you really love something, then it loves you back, in whatever way it has to love.’ I didn't think that this was true, […] but it was like every other thought and belief of Finny's: it should have been true. So I didn't argue” (Knowles 111). That is just life, love is something that is always there and needs to be accepted in anyway it can.
Love exists in the short story “The Bear Came Over the Mountain” by Alice Munro and in the short story “What We Talk About When We Talk About Love” by Raymond Carver. in Munro’s short story the plot is that of a mentally ill wife, Fiona, who falls in love with another patient while her husband still tries to hang on to their old love. Her husband eventually wants to have an affair with the wife of the man his wife is having an affair with. Their love changed because of their circumstances due to ill health. Carver’s story discusses the different definitions of love due to the type and quality of relationships; everyone has a different definition. Love also exists all over the world within different environments and cultures. The concept of love depends upon the environment in which it inhabits. Love is dependent on the life of the people in love and it also depends on their current environment. Nature and nurture are also huge factors into the development and process of love. What nature and nurture mean is whether it is due to how the person lives and acts along with their personality compared to whether it’s all in their genetics beforehand. Love is more on the nurture side instead of the nature side of human experience.
Love and hate, these are both things very present in life. Our world is filled with new celebrity relationships and new big name feuds. Many people would be lost without the gossip of love and hate in the world. This was also very true for the Puritans in early America. This combination or church and state allowed everyone to know each other's secrets and forces people to live very transparent lives. We can see this in the novel “The Scarlet Letter” by Nathaniel Hawthorne. The narrator in the novel uses this theme of love in times of sadness. “No matter whether of love or hate: no matter whether of right or wrong! Thou and thine, Hester Prynne, belong to me”(pg 115). This is one of the first times that we see the word love used
Huxley's work, Brave New World, is a book about a society that is in the future. This book contains many strange things that are generally unheard of today. Yet we see that some of the ideas that are presented in this book were already present in the 20th century. The idea of having one superior race of people can easily be seen as something that Hitler was trying to accomplish during the Holocaust. Huxley presents the society in his book as being a greater civilization. A totalitarian type of leadership is also presented in his book. According to him, this would be the best and most effective type of government. Hitler also thought that a totalitarian government was best. We see several similarities between Hitler's Germany and Huxley's
Aldous Huxley wisely inserts many instances of distortion to the elements in Brave New World to successfully caution the world about its growing interest in technology.
No emotion has such universal meaning as love. It is an integral part of the human condition. Love is the basis for by which all other emotions can be gauged. Friendship and even grief are steeped in love. Love is so central to our lives that it is fitting and proper that it should be the topic of so much discussion. Every culture and every writer has some commentary or evaluation of love. The New Testament has its share of love commentary. The entire basis of the Christian tradition is God's love for humanity. "God so loved the world that he gave his only Son." (John 3:6) Jesus preached a great deal about love of neighbor, love of God and even love of enemies. (Matt 5:44) Shakespeare's Biblical knowledge is well known and he
nature of love and argues that there should be a balance between the two. He elaborates on that
Firstly, the theme love has the potential to change people 's opinions towards each other is evident in the novel the help. The author of the novel, Kathryn Stockett has shown this theme through the character Skeeter who is a white person and her whole family believe that white people are better than black people and that black people should not have equal rights. However, the person who was paid to bring up Skeeter by her family was a black person named Constantine. Because Skeeter loved Constantine who was a black person, her views were different to the views of her family and her opinion towards black people 's rights was that they should be equal to the rights of people with white skin. The author teaches the reader that love has the potential to change others opinions towards each other through this example by showing how Skeeters love for her black caregiver Constantine changed her opinion towards black people because her family and society taught her to believe that white people are better than black people but Constantine believes that everyone should be treated equally regardless of their
In a less fantastical and dramatic sense, I agree with Aristophanes that love is a form of reconnection with another. Love, simply stated, is seeing a reflection of your own existence within someone else. I realize that that may sound somewhat inconstruable, but if compassion is a very basic and universal form of love, which I believe it is, then it is clear that we get love through finding some sort of commonality with each other. Of course, by this very definition, I do not agree with Aristophanes that love is found with only one individual that we have been literally separated from- I believe love can be found in any one. If we have the capacity to feel pain for another person, even another animal, then we must also have the ability to feel love for all. As pain is a form of suffering,
While people are often able to identify when they feel the emotion love, love itself seems to defy definition. In her polemic “Against Love”, Laura Kipnis argues that love cannot exist as traditional expressions of love such as marriage, monogamy, and mutuality. However, in her argument, she defines love incorrectly by equating love to expressions of love. This definition lacks a component essential to understanding the abstract concept of love: emotion. Recognizing love as emotion helps us realize that, contrary to Kipnis’ argument love by nature transcends all expressions of love. Love is subjective and exists in any and all forms. In her argument that love cannot survive as conventional expressions of love, Kipnis ignores the nature of love as emotion in favor of equating love to different expressions of love. Love is a force which exists above expressions of love; a true understanding of love can only come from an assessment of how individuals, not societies, respond to the emotion.
The word love has a tangled variety of meanings, fitting for the complexity of love itself. One meaning illustrated by H. Jackson Brown describes love as “the feeling when the other person 's happiness is more important than your own,”, a standard and employed idea today. There are many definitions and ideas that attempt to encompass the emotion, each varying with the person. But how is one able to truly give a definition on the matter? Just as emotions are subject to change, love is often reshaped throughout a period of time, as seen in the novels the Alchemist and Siddhartha. While both main characters embark on self-seeking journeys, or self-enlightenments, their own perspectives of love get reshaped along the way. Siddhartha and Santiago struggle to find the balance between personal accomplishment and love, ultimately realizing love itself is a critical necessity to enlightenment.
Love is a yearning for the enduring possession of the good. What this means is that one’s ambition of love is for his or her own personal benefit. In his speech, Aristophanes had explained through a comical myth that love is the search for
We do not seek love , love seeks us until we are ready to surrender until we have no resistance to it and then love comes it seeks us not the other way around is a huge blow to the egoistic side of human being the rational intellect which believes to conquer anything if willed not withstanding that only if the will cooperates with love’s true will then would anything be conquered . In ignorance to that we are nothing but being who opposes love , it is like our own cells have started to kill the cells of our body because their belief is autonomous function and individuality , loathing of the other infact what is loathed is one.