Does The Public Or Private Extinction In Greek Politics?

together can be a bad action taken by the government. The reason I say this is because, in economic terms, reduction in government spending and increasing tax collection at the same time is like hitting someone with two hammers together. This will only lead to a shift to the left of aggregate demand and is it impossible for the people to pay taxes when the living standards is low. (Figure 2)

The city-states of Ancient Greek provide examples of different types of government structures that, even

The government the U.S has today is very similar to the government Greece and Rome had. Greece and Rome were very advanced in government because they had a variety of principles including democracy, checks and balances, and citizen duties. The U.S copied these principles of government from Greece and Rome and they are still used today. Democracy was used in Greece in Rome and was modeled by the U.S later on.

Ancient Greece was famous for its art and ideas. Greek people were very creative in great epics, history, dramas, philosophy, science, mathematics, and medicines. The ancient Greece was covered with mountains, rocky hills, and narrow valleys. Greek later became educated about trading with the Mediterranean. Modern Democracy is more concerned about peace, division of power and providing equal rights of every citizen of a country however, in the ancient Greece was involved with war among the state, misuse of political power, discriminate slaves and poor farmers.

After the Assembly had convened for the night, I circled the Pnyx listening to the different factions discussing the day’s events. The Moderate Democrats approached the Farmer and told him they wanted to help the little guys like himself. The Radical Democrats thought the more people who have jobs and are paid the more money there would be circulating through the economy. They also thought the Socratics were biased and that everyone should be happy if they get the right to vote. The Oligarchs believe an oligarchy would be the best for Athens because action happens faster when fewer people have a say. As I am about to leave, a Socratic approached me and tells me I have a place in their society because I am educated. But do I want to live in a society without all my merchant friends who also happen to be metics?

Political parties as we know them did not begin to develop until the late 1600s. The ancient Greeks, who were pioneers in developing democracy, had no organized political parties in the modern sense. The senate of the ancient Romans had two groups that represented people with different interests — the Patricians and the Plebeians. The Patricians represented noble families. The Plebeians represented the wealthy merchants and the middle class. Although these two groups often mingled, at times they voted as factions, or parties, on particular issues that were important to the groups they represented.

In the ancient Greek city-states and over many centuries, the government (political power) took many forms: held by a single individual: (monarchies and tyrants), or by a select few (oligarchies and aristocracies), or by every male citizen (democracy). A monarchy is a type of governance of the people by a single individual, with the power retained by blood lines. In the pre-Classical period, ancient Greece was composed of small geographic units ruled by a local king. People in these small geographic units, paid taxes to the king, obeyed his laws, and depended on him for their defense.

Over 2000 years ago, two great civilizations were established. They each made advancements in technology and science that laid the groundwork for what we have now. They have been depicted in movies and books, but what elements of those were true? Hollywood may be entertaining, but it’s not always correct.

The government is the primary determinant of a nation's success. A good leadership offers the right direction, management, planning among many other leadership processes that can take the nation to higher levels of growth. The primary aim of every nation is to achieve a higher level of economic growth and development. In all this, the government will determine whether the nation makes the intended goals and objectives or not. This paper contains a discussion of the Athenians and the Roman Republicans forms of government.

      In Greek society, the public realm was a place of action: a place to achieve freedom.  As time progressed, wealth increased among individuals, making it less defined.  These changes blurred the division between public and private realms

The citizens of ancient Greek were oppressed and suffered under the strict monarchy; they had no input until a new form of government was born---the birth of democracy changed their life entirely. Democracy is defined as a system of government by all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives. The concept of democracy is still frequently disputed today, and is tangled with many world affairs. Back in 510 BCE, soon after the notion of democracy was first born, the world witnessed the development and thriving of democracy in ancient Greece. Although it was not direct democracy in the beginning and had a limited number of people voting, it brought prosperity as well as harmony to the society for both citizens and the government.

Greek democracy was a complex and new idea to the world. While not operating like the democracies we see in the world today it is credited with having introduced the idea to the world and showed that it could work to create a nation that can experience great wealth, generate innovative art and architecture, and enjoy relative peace for long periods of time. It wasn’t to last however and I’ll investigate here some of causes that led to its collapse.

It is the Greek culture which shaped the modern society. The importance that the Greeks placed upon their citizens in terms of government, helped shape the Greek culture. The Greeks change in politics from an Oligarchy to democracy. With the reliance on the average Greek citizen strengthened the Greek democracy. From the shift in power from the hoi polloi to average Greek citizen caused a shift in Greek culture. The responsibility placed on the citizens that resulted in the progression of Greek politics, drama, sculpture, and philosophy.

I enjoyed reading your post this week, too. I agree with you in most of your statements that, especially, with the statement of If we use Roisman's "self-restraint" approach as a framework to evaluating Aeschines' speech, we see that Aeschines is striving to establish a strong connection between the ability to place the polis' interest above one's own desires and the ability to control one's impulsive behavior. Can we say that Aeschines worried about the Athenian’s future that a weak generation of men would harm the prosperity and freedom of the Athens? Because he had many lover as he stated in his speeches, and we cannot know if his lovers were only male or only female, and maybe from both genders, but regardless of assuming and

one essential conviction, expressed in the word democracy itself: that power should be in the hands of the people. Although democracy today has been slightly inefficient in this idea, with the wealthy, elite class challenging this right, “it nevertheless claims for itself a fundamental validity that no other kind of society shares….” To completely understand the structure of democracy, one must return to the roots of the practice itself, and examine the origins in ancient Greece, the expansion in the Roman Empire, and how these practices combined make what we recognize as today’s democratic government.