preview

Does War Follow Religion

Better Essays

Does War Follow Religion?

Religion has its share of causing grief, along with undoubtedly being an indirect cause to war. Religion is the cause of many things, some being good and some being bad. It can tear people apart, but it can also bring them together. All throughout history there have been many wars that were started due to a religious dispute between whoever was involved. While many people believe that religion is not one of the starting factors of war, the Lebanese Civil War, the Buddhist Uprising, and the Crusades prove those beliefs to be false, for they are directly tied to a religious cause.

The Lebanese Civil War was a civil war that lasted for 16 years, starting in 1975 and ending in 1991. Even though this is the biggest civil …show more content…

In 1065, Jerusalem was taken by the Turks. Then, 3000 Christians were massacred, and the remaining Christians in Jerusalem were treated so bad that it caused unrest amongst the Christians of Europe, leading to the “awakening of the desire to reclaim to Holy Lands from the grasp of the infidels” (“Cause of Crusades”). This awakening led to the enragement of the people of Europe, causing them to take up arms against the Muslims and begin the First Crusade. The First Crusade started in 1096, and lasted until the year 1099. “A less organized band of knights and commoners known as the People’s Crusade set off before the others under the command of a popular preacher known as Peter the Hermit” (“First Crusade”). This action resulted in the first major battle of the Crusades, which then proceeded to the decimation of the invading Europeans by the Turkish forces in Cibotus. The four main armies of the Crusaders, led by leaders Raymond of Saint-Gilles, Godfrey of Bouillon, Hugh of Vermandois and Bohemond of Taranto, came together in Constantinople, from which they began their march through Anatolia. In late 1099, the Crusader army captured the city of Jerusalem from the Muslims, but at the cost of hundreds of men, women, and even …show more content…

Because of this, the Muslims began to gain ground in their own holy war against the Christians, as there were not enough Crusaders left to properly defend their newly regained holy land. This mistake on the Crusaders part led to the start of the Second Crusade, which began in 1147 and ended in 1149. The end of the Second Crusade came abruptly, ending right after the humiliating defeat of the Crusaders by the Muslim forces in the Syrian stronghold of Damascus. The Crusaders suffer two losses between the second and third Crusades, of which the Christian army at the battle of Hattin was destroyed, and the Muslims gained back a large amount of territory. The Christians were outraged at the defeats, At the end of the Third Crusade, a peace treaty was signed, but it only reestablished the Kingdom of Jerusalem, and not the city Jerusalem. Although Pope Innocent lll called for a new Crusade,power struggles within Europe and Byzantium drove the Crusaders to divert their goal to overthrowing the current Byzantine emperor. The Fourth Crusade ended after the Crusaders declared war on, destroyed, and pillaged Constantinople. The final Crusades were a variety of smaller Crusades with a different purpose. These Crusades, instead of trying to take the holy land from Muslim forces, Crusaders now focused on combating all the enemies of the Christian

Get Access