Dog Park Argument Analysis

Decent Essays
As tax-payers, us residents need to remind ourselfs of the consequences of ignoring issues at hand when facing contradictory opinion. Both sides of the argument contribute with valid information about the problem, personally i feel that if each side decide to read the oposite grievance, with an empathic frame of mind they would probably be less dissatisfied with the outcome and have a more solid ground in which to take their stances. For exemple; A dog owner would cite that 37% of Americans who own's dogs ofeten look for a dog park when choosing where to live, or as an "opposing voice" i may say that fencing alone may cause $70,000. If opposing i would state that 37% does not constitute majority, the city have other problems which if solve
Get Access