Dog Park Benefits All

According to one article '' That 37% of americans who own dogs often look for a dog park when choosing for a place to live''. With dog parks everyone would benefit. Without a place to take dogs they may never socialize much and can become aggresive.Though a good point can be made that dog parks can be loud at times. I still believe that dog parks are needed.

To many complications will come from a dog park. Such as situations like a dog attacking another dog or even attacking someone else. This can cause a lot of upset owners. Also many painful court cases. Dog parks will bring up a lot of legal issues that we don't need.

Dogs should have their own parks,because when dogs aren't getting the physical and mental excercise that they need, their behavior tend to get worse. ASPCA has a study that shows the rate of dogs biting humans went down drastically in places where they're dog parks. ASPCA also believes that if dogs had a park then their would be less incidents of dogs attacking humans,barking, and destroying things. Many dog owners have given their dogs up , because they started to act like''bad dogs'', this is because they don't have a dog park to excercise all their energy everyday. Dogs need a park just like humans.

Public dog parks have proven to improve the health of the animals, decrease dog-related attacks, and increase the population in the surrounding area of the dog park. While concerns over the comfort of the surrounding residents comes into question, many of those issues may be resolved with appropriate laws set into place. For these reasons, I believe builing a public dog park would be a positive addition to the

We as a comunity have to deside if we can use a dog park. I live in Kalispell Montana and in my case we dont have a dog park. I believe that Kalispell does not need a dog park because of the population. In my exsperince we never needed a dog park we have many parks that you can take your dog to so he/she can run around. When my family and I got my blue nose pit he needed lots of room to rome and play. I took my dog named Spike on long walks, long boarding trips, and

I believe most if not all cities should have a public dog park. Since I was nine years old I have always owned a dog. I have lived the city all of my life as well. Living in the city there is many apartment buildings with little to no yard space. To keep a healthy and friendly dog the dog needs exercise and play dates. Because most pet owners in the city have no yard space for these activities. a public dog park is the perfect solution.

The second passage "No Dog Park for Muscatine", is clearly against having a dog park in the community. Their opinion is that it is a waste of tax payer money and they should not be forced to pay for it. It is also believed that it would cause a noise ordinance issue since a large dog's bark can reach up to at least one hundred decibels. They believe that a dog owners should be responsible

I do believe it would be best for everyones sake if the dog park was built. Clearly, the passage stated in benefit to the dog park being built, "Bad behaior caused by dogs being lonely or poorly exercised is partly responsible for the 2 million pet dogs that end up at U.S. animal shelters every year." The prevention of putting an animal in a shelter could possibly avoid lawsuits from the animal attacking a person.

Some believe, dog owners shouldnt pressure the city to provide the community with a dog park, because its your problem not having the space and the place to walk your dog. But on the other hand, having a dog park is great for the dogs. Its physically and mentally good for the dogs according to the ASPCA.

I feel that a dog park could benefit dog owners and dogs in a number of beneficial ways. By having a dog park, dogs would be able to get the right amount of exercise that they need. Dogs would learn to get along with other dogs and by doing that it would teach them obidience. Also, i feel that everyone, including people that don't own dogs, could benefit by having a dog park in their community.

I am a proponent of dog parks. It is my belief that these parks are a wonderful addition to any community. There are many benefits to having such parks, not just for the animals, but for us as well.

A vast majority of citizens in one city own dogs. Some citizens would prefer having a dog park for there dogs, but some do not think it would be the best idea for the community. Dogs can get out of control, attack others, put other dogs at risk and so for. Dogs can also get out and communicate with each other and have the best behavior. People have different opinions on this situation and i think adding a dog park in cities would be an excelant idea.

I firmly support the building of a public dog park in the residential area in the city of Muscatine, Iowa. Apartment buildings have very little yard space, which leaves the only exercise alternative a daily walk in the neighborhood. I have lived in cities that have ordinances with no dogs aloud off-leash in public areas, it makes exercising dogs properly very difficult. My dog used to go crazy when I couldn't get her the proper exercise after being cooped up all day.

In these passages they explain the reasons of why there should be a dog park nearby and why there shouldn't be a dog park nearby. Personally I think that dog parks are a brilliant idea because it creates a more social environment for both the dogs and the owners. It is also beneficial to getting more people to move into the community which could possibly lower taxes.

Funding a dog park in Muscatine, Iowa has many benefits. As dogowners we understand the importance of daily excercise for a dog. We understand that lack of excercise for our dogs have negative outcomes one being destructive behavior at home. Having access to a dog park also opens the door to more socializing between dogs which reduces the dog-bite incidents that have been reported over the last year. The other benefit of having a dog park in Muscatine, Iowa would be the reduced amount of dogs in animal shelters.