Dog Park For Muscastine Case Study

Muscatine, Iowa, do not build a dog park! Building a dog park would endanger the lives of your people living in the city. Pets are their owner's responsibility and dogs are loud. A dog park would drive home owners away.

According to one article '' That 37% of americans who own dogs often look for a dog park when choosing for a place to live''. With dog parks everyone would benefit. Without a place to take dogs they may never socialize much and can become aggresive.Though a good point can be made that dog parks can be loud at times. I still believe that dog parks are needed.

Before you jump to the hasty conclusion that I’m opposed to a dog park because I do not have a dog, let me assure you I do have a dog and am aware of my responsibilities as an owner. The principal argument for a dog park is “exercise is important to dogs’ mental and physical health.” I would take this argument a step further and state exercise is also

Opportunity costs of building this park would include less land for outdoor recreation or public recreation. The town is very limited on public spaces and land so creating the dog park would consume further parts of the land making even less of space for

Residents in the area will also have to deal with the exsive noise and unneeded trafic. With a dog park also comes barking. This means dogs barking and owners

Dogs should have their own parks,because when dogs aren't getting the physical and mental excercise that they need, their behavior tend to get worse. ASPCA has a study that shows the rate of dogs biting humans went down drastically in places where they're dog parks. ASPCA also believes that if dogs had a park then their would be less incidents of dogs attacking humans,barking, and destroying things. Many dog owners have given their dogs up , because they started to act like''bad dogs'', this is because they don't have a dog park to excercise all their energy everyday. Dogs need a park just like humans.

Public dog parks have proven to improve the health of the animals, decrease dog-related attacks, and increase the population in the surrounding area of the dog park. While concerns over the comfort of the surrounding residents comes into question, many of those issues may be resolved with appropriate laws set into place. For these reasons, I believe builing a public dog park would be a positive addition to the

We as a comunity have to deside if we can use a dog park. I live in Kalispell Montana and in my case we dont have a dog park. I believe that Kalispell does not need a dog park because of the population. In my exsperince we never needed a dog park we have many parks that you can take your dog to so he/she can run around. When my family and I got my blue nose pit he needed lots of room to rome and play. I took my dog named Spike on long walks, long boarding trips, and

I believe most if not all cities should have a public dog park. Since I was nine years old I have always owned a dog. I have lived the city all of my life as well. Living in the city there is many apartment buildings with little to no yard space. To keep a healthy and friendly dog the dog needs exercise and play dates. Because most pet owners in the city have no yard space for these activities. a public dog park is the perfect solution.

Limiting a dog's physical activity can lead to many other problems such as dog-bite reports increasing, crowded dog shelters, and bad behaved dogs. Adding a dog park will only befenfit the growth of city in many aspects. Property values will increase and lawsuits should decrease, because dogs are proven to be more well behaved when active and social with one another.

Well, here we have two differentes points of view, the first one expones very good arguments about it, and the second mmm.... it seems only like a personal opinion, not strong enough, obviosly one loves dogs and the other one does not. Lets go and check this.

I believe that a dog park is both good and, bad and I have many reasons for that statement, when considering a place to build a dog park first it does infact need to be a lot larger than only one acre, Because a lot of dogs are territorial and when you end up having too many dominate dogs in one area, problems are bound to occor.

I feel that a dog park could benefit dog owners and dogs in a number of beneficial ways. By having a dog park, dogs would be able to get the right amount of exercise that they need. Dogs would learn to get along with other dogs and by doing that it would teach them obidience. Also, i feel that everyone, including people that don't own dogs, could benefit by having a dog park in their community.

A public park is perfect place for a dog. Dogs will adjust to their surroundings, such as a place for dogs and strangers to be. In cities there are a numerous amount of dog owners who can catch walking or going for a jog in the park. As well as families who take their dogs along with them to enjoy the open. Theres room for everyone to enjoy themselves and get that daily exercise that everyone

Having a dog park would be a positive thing for the dogs and their owners. The dogs need exercize for their mental and physical health.They need too learn how too be around other dogs. Sometimes when dogs dont get enough exercize they start showing bad behavior.Having a dog park would also raise property values in communities.