Domestic Terror Attack Analysis

On the day of September 11, 2001, the United States faced one of the most massive terrorist attacks in history, and responded with immediate action. After the attack on the Twin Towers, President George W. Bush passed the Patriot Act, which gave the government more opportunities to pursue terrorists through the use of technology, such as computer-enabled device-tracking systems (“The USA Patriot…”). President Bush stated, “This legislation is essential not only to pursuing and punishing terrorists, but also preventing more atrocities in the hands of the evil ones. This government will enforce this law with all the urgency of a nation at war” (“President Bush…” 4). In America, at this time, many were traumatized by the loss of fellow Americans, and were counting on the government to reassure their safety. If Bush had not intensified cybersecurity, there is a chance that another massive terror attack could have taken place and put the lives of men, women, and children in jeopardy. Bush claims that America has “seen the horrors terrorists can inflict” and that the country “may never know what horrors our country was spared by the diligent and determined work of our police forces, the FBI, ATF agents, federal marshals, Custom officers, Secret Service, intelligence professionals and local law enforcement

September 11th catalyzed a major revival in the American public’s concern for domestic national security, which had dropped off following the collapse of the Soviet Union. The attacks, which were the first on American soil since Pearl Harbor, prompted American leaders to respond with swift and ambitious military action. At this time, the public perceived security of American territory against “terrorism”–an intentionally broad and emotionally charged term– as its chief national interest. Following the attack, President Bush announced the launch of a “global war on terror”, an international effort to combat terrorist groups and the nations that harbor them–prompting him to establish the Department of Homeland Security later that year.

On September 11, 2001, terrorists initiated multiple attacks on America that took the lives of nearly three thousand innocent people. It was a day of destruction and horror that will be branded in the minds of many for a long time. The tragedies on 9/11 could have been avoided if airport security in the United States had been stricter. A strong foundation for Homeland Security is essential in protecting America from further attacks. In the essay

On September 11, 2001, the Unites States suffered massive destruction caused by terrorism. Four planes were hijacked by terrorist. Nearly, three thousand lives were lost when two planes crashed into the World Trade Towers, one crashed into the Pentagon, and the final plane crashed in Pennsylvania before it could reach its final destination. An immense fear spread across the country and out of this fear came the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct the Terrorism, also known as the USA Patriot Act.

As evident from the actual attacks made by this group, any move by the Al- Qaeda poses a threat to the wellness of the citizens of America. Not only did the team focus on killing people, but it also had the department of defense as a target implying that it aimed at weakening the security of the country. In open letter made by Osama bin Laden (Al-Qaeda’s leader) to the USA, he described the group’s motive to stop America from engaging in peace missions in locations where Al-Qaeda or Islamic nations are involved. According to the United States, however, finishing such missions translates to the promotion of terrorism which cannot be tolerated in the country`s aim of supporting peace missions (Michael

I believe that Al Qaeda is serious about attacking the United States again. After reading the article, I felt disturbed on how Asiri was the one that caused the deadly bombing incidents and why he hasn’t been captured yet. I fear that Al Qaeda can’t be stopped by how much power and people they hold, but there is still a possibility. Furthermore, terrorist groups are disparaging and will do anything to get what they want. These kinds of groups aren’t needed in this world and should be put in end to before anything else

In an increasingly hostile world, the threats and list of non-state actors willing to do harm to the United States (U.S.) is only increasing daily. A little known or possibly underestimated group who poses a threat in addition to the Islamic State (IS), who has recently been the biggest concern, is Al-Shabaab (ALS). Al-Shabaab is an Al-Qaeda in the Arabia Peninsula (AQAP) and Al-Qaeda (AQ) affiliate operating in the horn of Africa. It could be suggested that ALS is an emerging threat to the U.S. due to the increased immigration to the United States from Somalia and other countries within the horn of Africa. From potential lone wolf attacks to coordinated efforts it is suggested that the U.S. mainland will at some point experience an attack planned and carried out by ALS if this group is not watched more heavily.

There are many psychological and behavioral factors that may contribute to someone becoming a homegrown terrorist. Some of these factors include uncertainty toward or disappointment in parental figures, prolonged youth identity searching with the crises that accompany it, and possible issues toward women, intimacy, marriage, (Olsson 2013). Other factors also include issues with authority such as fearing or hating authority while longing for effective authority (Olsson 2013).

Terrorism has always been a major threat to the United States. Before the attacks on September 11, 2001 there had been several terrorist attacks on U.S. soil. Between 1980 and 2000, the FBI recorded 335 incidents or suspected incidents of terrorism in the United States, 247 were attributed to domestic terrorists, while 88 were determined to be international terrorists (FBI, 2002). In particular, in the 1990s there were terrorist attacks

On September 11th, 2001, the entire world witnessed the revolutionary terrorist acts of global militant group Al Qaeda, as US commercial airplanes were high jacked and crashed onto American soil leading to the death of thousands of innocent lives, shining a new light onto the face of global terrorism (The 9/11 Commission, 2004). Although this tragedy was recognized and publicized more extensively than others, the idea of Al Qaeda has existed for approximately 30 years,

Some experts and analysts were under the notion that al Shabaab was trending down. Except that merely one week ago, two events transpired that should put those misaligned prognostications to rest. First, al Shabaab recaptured the key port city of Merca, and second, they are also suspected of being responsible for an explosion aboard a Daallo Airlines flight from Mogadishu to Djibouti. The explosion tore a hole in the fuselage and sucked one man’s charred body out of the plane. These two events occurring within the span of a week suggest that al Shabaab is most certainly not trending down. Al Shabaab’s recent flexing of muscle, combined with it’s transnational capabilities to commit terrorist acts, illustrates that this terrorist group deserves an elevated importance among the US intelligence community (IC) and requires increased intelligence resources to

The fight against terrorism is an ongoing and relentless battle. As part of their effort to combat terrorism, the United States has developed a counterterrorism strategy, which includes eight goals. The first is to “Protect the American People, Homeland, and American Interests” (Forest & Howard, 2013, p. 796). America is The Land of Liberty, a place where all people come to be safe and free. At the heart of counterterrorism is the overarching desire to protect innocent lives. The second goal is “Disrupt, Degrade, Dismantle, and Defeat al-Qa’ida and Its Affiliate and Adherents” (Forest & Howard, 2013, p. 796). Al-Qa’ida, the terrorist organization responsible for the attacks of 9/11, presents a particularly relevant threat to the United States

Al-Qaeda is a worldwide terrorist system established by Usama receptacle Loaded [the "Osama" spelling is deplored, on the grounds that there is no letter "O" in Arabic). Supported counterterrorism weight subsequent to 2008 - including the slaughtering of al-Qaida pioneers Usama container Ladin, Atiyah Abel al Rahman, and lIyas Kashmiri in 2011 - decreased the Pakistan-based center al-Qaida 's union and capacities, including its capacity to mount modern, complex assaults in the West like the 2006 Transoceanic Aircraft plot. Be that as it may, notwithstanding these misfortunes, al-Qaida holds its expectation, however maybe not the strong capacity, to arrange and direct terrori st assaults against the West, including the U.S. country. Center al-Qaida in all likelihood will likewise attempt to rouse provincial hubs and partners, and also unaffiliated yet similarly invested radicals, to participate in terrorism against the West.

One of the principal goals of the Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) was to drive the United States armed forces out of Saudi Arabia and Somalia by violence. It’s opposing the United States for several reasons’ first United States was regarded as ‘infidel’ because it was not governed in a manner consistent with the group’s extremist’s interpretation of Islam. Second, the united state was viewed as providing the essential support for other infidel government and institutions such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt, the nation of Israel and UNO which war regarded as the enemies of the group. Third, al-Qaida opposed the involvement of the United States armed forces in the gulf war in 1991 and in operation restore hope in Somalia in 1991 and 1993 which were viewed by al-Qaida as perpetual preparations for an American occupation of Islamic countries.

The franchise relationship between AQAP and the al-Qaida core has also caused AQAP to take on some serious disadvantages in their operations. This display is a good example of how taking on the al-Qaida brand also comes with disadvantages. “Some of these groups are reluctant to identify explicitly with al-Qaida due to the risk that open affiliation might make them a target of increased counterterrorism operations from their home countries.” One example of this is the increased use of drone strikes in Yemen by the US, which many authors claim is directly connected to AQAP’s affiliation with the al-Qaida network. ‘This identification can be said to have weakened the AQAP’s organization as a result of its increased targeting by foreign