Domestic Terrorism Term paper

Today, domestic terrorism is one of the major threats to the national security of the US. Since 9/11, the US intelligence services and law enforcement agencies viewed international terrorism as the major threat to the public security of the US but the threat of domestic terrorism has been underestimated. At any rate, American law enforcement agencies conduct active campaigns to prevent international terrorism but domestic terrorism become a serious threat to the national security of the US. In such a way, the US needs to develop effective strategies to prevent the rise of domestic terrorism. Otherwise, the US may face a threat of the consistent growth of domestic terrorism as do some European countries, such as the UK, for instance. Therefore, law enforcement agencies should focus their attention on the prevention of domestic terrorism because, even though domestic terrorism is unseen, it may be even more dangerous than international terrorism. Domestic terrorists undermine the country from within, while international terrorists attack the US from the outside and the US can raise barriers to protect Americans from the foreign threat, while domestic terrorism needs effective work of law enforcement agencies nationwide. Therefore, domestic terrorism is a serious threat to the national security of the US and American law enforcement agencies along legislators and the public have to unite their efforts in the struggle against domestic terrorism.

Introduction. The United States’ War on Terror is a mistake because it is bringing more burdens and terrorism to the United States at home and abroad.

1. Is the "war on terrorism" truly a war? In your opinion, how has the New Terrorism affected and redefined how nations pursue warlike options?

4) What has been the economic impact of terrorism on U.S. and Global Markets since

1. Explain the major tactical phases of a terrorist operation and describe the considerations used by terrorists in selecting targets and identify the three major elements that define 9/11 as a terrorist attack.

Weapons often seem as a necessity when it comes to defense, whether it be self defense or the defense of peace and freedom. In the United States’ war with Iraq, there have been a reported one hundred sixty-five thousand Iraqi civilians were killed between 2003 and 2015. All too often, civilians find themselves victim to war violence.

The first essay question in the final assignment asks students to discuss the capabilities and limitations of intelligence in supporting homeland security efforts. Intelligence matters have greatly improved on this front compared to the way things used to be prior to the September 11th terror attacks, but there are areas that still need to be addressed. The Department of Homeland Security has also helped get information to the field by creating fusion cells, the (JCAT), and encouraging the use of intelligence-based policing.

National terrorism has been the focus of attention since September 11. But now domestic terrorism is becoming increasingly common among hate groups across the nation. Domestic terrorism can be defined as visible crime, or “street crime.” These acts would consist of violent crimes, (acts against people in which injury or death results) property crimes (acts that threaten property held by individuals or the state) and public order crimes. (acts that threaten the general well-being of society and challenger accepted moral principles) It can also however be described as political crime, (criminal acts by or against the government for ideological purposes) which would include the 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombing.

This author’s knowledge then can be very valid as he knows the ins and outs of how America deals with security threats. This means that this author is not like other authors as they have not been in that situation as he has had to deal with threats and was around then the war on terror was getting more serious. ‘In 1984, the Reagan Administration used the term "war against terrorism" as part of an effort to pass legislation that was designed to freeze assets of terrorist groups and marshal the forces of government against them’ .it was around then terrorism was a major threat to western states. This is good for the bibliography as it shows a different point of view and gives the bibliography more variety and different perspectives on war on

Weapons of mass destruction, or WMDs, are, according to the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission (WMDC), “the most inhumane of all weapons and are rightly called weapons of mass destruction and weapons of terror” (WMDC 2006 p 229). Primary regulatory efforts geared toward controlling the attainment, maintenance, and use of weapons of mass destruction is extremely important and is regulated by international law. Treaties and agreements are initiated and enforced through entities like the United Nations and other governmental and non-governmental agencies as attempts to keep WMDs out of the hands of certain groups and individuals while enforcing responsible measures of those who currently possess them.

There are a couple of sayings about terrorism: the first is that terrorism is a “weapon of the weak” and that “terrorist want a lot of people watching, not dead”. If these saying are true, then the threat or risks of terrorist using a WMD would be fairly low. And with the consequences of a WMD attack being far reaching, one must remain alert for changes that may signify a WMD attack. In 1999,

The question on whether or not terrorist groups are likely to use CBRN weapons in the United States or anywhere else in the world remains an unconfirmed debate of opinions. Sinai’s (2007) article ,explaining certain characteristics about the terrorists threat, states that illicit supply networks exists in countries that promote proliferation of these types of weapons and reported the occurrence where Usama Bin Laden tried to acquire a cylinder of weapons-grade uranium (Sinai 2007, para 24). This inherently proves that groups such as al Qaeda possess at least the interest of acquiring these weapons but still remains unconfirmed about whether they intend to use them. This is also a statement that suggests that certain nations have more lenient or even complacent policies towards controlling these types of weapons.

Ever since the tragic events that took place on 9/11, the looming fear of terrorist organization opting to use a Weapon of Mass Destruction has manifested itself into the biggest concern for our nation’s Homeland Security. To prevent such destructive weaponry from ever falling into the possession of a hostile extremist group, the United States government must continue to be active and remain persistent in their counterterrorism efforts. Several major terrorist organizations throughout the middle-east, are vigorously attempting to obtain and even develop these weapons so they can be used against their enemies. Even the very thought of a terrorist group, such as ISIS, successfully obtaining or developing a Weapon of Mass Destruction alone, is

Weapons of mass destruction include nuclear, chemical and biological weapons as well as materials with unpredictable and fluctuating levels of destructive power and political effect, all of which require specific policy and strategy. Due to this, whether it be nuclear, chemical or biological weapons in question, cooperation at the global, regional and national levels, and between government and private sector is essential in addressing particular threats. Members of the global community must take necessary steps and responsibilities in order to contain and counter threats effectively. These include legislative measures, export controls, and ensuring and maintaining a culture of security. Throughout much of recent history there has been considerable indication that the United States of America exists as the standard example for democracy, respect for human rights and human liberty. However, their reputation has been explicitly diminished succeeding the events of September 11th 2001, in relation to the ‘war on terror’, weapons of mass destruction and their subsequent responses. Furthermore, these topics of international security and threats to the global community are highly contentious and are up for much debate as revealed in the exchange between Noam Chomsky and Sam. Through analyzing their discussion surrounding these issues this paper will argue that Noam Chomsky won the debate. He presented a highly persuasive argument which reveals that the relevance to terrorism,

The Global War on Terror is a military campaign led by the United States and the United Kingdom and supported by other NATO members. It was originally against al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations with the purpose of eliminating them. This paper discusses how the Bush Administration handled the War on Terror as well as different aspects of it, including its terminology, its objectives, its military operations and criticism against it.