Domestic Violence Case Study

This is how I believe that collaboration could improve and enhances the outcome of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). Our lesson states that Action Coalitions (ACs) are the driving force of the Future of Nursing (CCN, 2015). This is the reason why the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) must united with leaders, lawmakers, advocates, police department and the community health nurse to further minimize or eradicate IVP before it even started. Also, they can guarantee safety for victims and educate perpetrators. While caring for

In the United States, approximately 1.5 million women report some form of intimate partner violence (IPV) each year and of those an estimated 324,000 are pregnant (Deshpande & Lewis-O'Connor, 2013). According to Deshpande and Lewis-O’Connor (2013), IPV is defined as abuse that may be actual or threatened by an intimate partner that can be physical, sexual, psychological, or emotional in nature. It is important for health care providers to realize IPV does not only include physical or sexual abuse but also includes name calling, financial control, constant criticism, and isolating women away from their families and friends (Deshpande & Lewis-O'Connor, 2013; Smith, 2008). There are 3 phases of abuse tension building

The study assessed 113 preschool age children who were exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV). The study was about five weeks long and it focused on preschoolers who were given an intervention and those who did not participate in the intervention. The population was children under six years of age who were exposed to IPV.  The children attended the Kids Club Program which is a recognized program to assist children exposed family violence. The children who participated were between the ages of 4 and 6 years old. The participants met for 10 sessions that lasted five weeks. Each session lasted one hour with five to six children participating. The intervention was in a community setting at Education Centers or Shelters at outreach programs.

Is there a difference in decision making on parental care between abused and non-abused women attending MCH services in Melbourne.

Gender role socialization is the process that explains the gaining social beliefs and attitudes that related with one’s sex. Based on Sociologists they defined that female and male perform differently, from which they acquire different social roles.

Due to the lack of resources available for members of the lesbian and gay community, I am looking to start a program that caters to that population. The program will assist lesbians and gay folks who are in violent intimate relationships with immediate services aimed at stopping future violence. This program is important because it provides a safe space to an under-served populations that is faced with issues of intimate violence.

CM Gilmore conducted a phone interview with Becky Croft regarding the family of Tiffany Croutharmel. CM Gilmore explained the reason for the visit. Becky reported the following information:

Tenants’ complaint and Ms. Austin’s cross-complaint presented straight-forward causes of action concerning breach of contract and conversion. This case presented no issues or first impression or involved unsettled areas of law. Discovery was procedurally limited given Tenants’ election to initiate a limited civil case, and substantively limited given the Tenants already had the vast majority of the evidence they relied on in their possession or control.

On 3/5/2016, CM met with the client after the case was reassigned to this CM and developed with the client first initial ILP Review. In the meeting client appears to be cooperative, and friendly. Client reported she is a victim of domestic violence with her daughter’s father. She reported she has unresolved issues. Client reported one is domestic violence and the other one is securing permanent housing so that her only child can spend time with her. During the meeting session client was emotionally teary she reported being residing in the shelter is not easy and being away from her daughter is taking a toll on her.

A virtually undocumented phenomenon has begun to appear within the field of violence. Most of the present research has been directed towards the female victims in intimate partner violence. Seldom do researchers focus their attention to the males offenders in these relationships. A majority of today’s society also tend to question why these violent relationships continue. A more through understanding of these men could potentially shed more light on intimate partner violence and produce better strategies that can be used to prevent these violent occurrences.

Decide whether or not the landlord and / or the tenant had a legal duty to mitigate damages.

The parties agree that in September 2015, Complainant submitted her rental application. The investigation further uncovered that eight one-bedroom apartments were available before Complainant submitted her application in September 2015. The parties agree that Respondents offered to place Complainant’s name on a wait list.

Miner is responsible for maintaining basic facilities in good repair, Ms. Miner is not responsible when the Plaintiff's own guest caused damage to the unit facility, complying with the terms of their leasing agreement. At no time was Plaintiff’s Ex, listed under the leasing agreement. Moreover, multiple tenants have stated that Plaintiff was in an on-again-off-again relationship with her attacker. With that in mind, Ms. Miner believed that Plaintiff Ex was a guest during both incidents where the Plaintiff's unit sustained damage. Nonetheless, Plaintiff was responsible for returning the unit in the same condition delivered. Likewise, Plaintiff did not leave the unit in the same condition by failing to fix the garbage disposal before her departure, thus within breach of the leasing agreement

At 1500 hours, I responded to 14 East Walnut Avenue and spoke with Ms. Edginton. She confirmed Ms. Herbert’s account about the arguments and using her driveway apron, but denied using course language. I informed Ms. Edginton that she is not welcome on Ms. Herbert’s property or to use the driveway apron. I instructed Ms. Edginton to notify the police should she need assistance. Ms. Edginton related that she understood. No further police action required at this

Upon arrival I spoke to the complainant, Minerva Barrera. Mrs. Barrera stated her residence had been broken into and vandalized. Mrs. Barrera stated her son; Ricky called her prior to her call to 911 and told her he witnessed Heather Houdek, an ex-girlfriend of his brother Benjamin was at the residence breaking things. Ricky explained that Heather and his brother separated four weeks prior to this incident and Heather had threatened to burn the house down. Ricky stated approximately an hour before this incident was reported he was inside his residence, a small RV style camper located approximately twenty yards behind the main house when he heard a metallic sound coming from outside. Ricky stated when he exited the trailer he observed Heather’s Green Jeep in the driveway. Ricky stated when he located Heather walking in front of his mother’s house he told Heather to leave the property. After confronting Heather, Ricky stated she then ripped a planted Lime tree out of a pot in