Don Sanders And The Issue Of Tuition Free Public College Essay

In the persuasive article “Why College Should Be Free”, Connor Bolinder disagrees with what an author had claimed, claiming that college shouldn’t be free, therefore he decides to discuss reasons why college should be free. Connor writes a compelling article with an upset tone. He also includes plenty of pathos in the article to make readers really connect emotionally to the subject and his claim, but backs it up with logos to prove this isn’t just his opinion.

In addition to new freedoms arrives the idea that one can make as much money as he or she desires. If those methods were to include educational scholarships or a job, money is always available. Dana Gioia’s “Money” poem makes the statement, “Money breeds money” (69). In the minds of the America

In “The Argument for Tuition-Free College,” Keith Ellison addresses the matter of free-tuition for colleges and universities in America. The high cost of tuition increasing inequality and the largest personal debt in the country, student loans, are the main two problems Ellison discussed. Claiming that minorities are less likely to succeed in the community is one of Ellison’s ways to support the issue. He promotes his argument with two solutions. In the first one he explains how to eliminate student loan debt. Ellison uses free primary and secondary schooling as an example to explain his second solution.

Senator Sanders continuously makes comparisons between the United States education system and many European countries. While his comparisons are harmless, they quite frankly make little sense. The top three most educated workforces in the world both pay for tuition, A quote on the Senators homepage notes that Germany recently abolished college tuition, and "Finland, Norway, Sweden and many other countries around the world also offer free college to all of their citizens." So lets look in

During one of his campaign programs, Presidential-candidate Bernie Sanders stood before a thousand applauding and cheering people. This man just announced, as hopeful future President of the United States, that he planned to make college free for every US citizen. Many young adults favor Bernie Sanders, and other political leaders, idea of free tuition because they believe that it will open more doors for them and allow them to not worry about the burden of student loans. However, there are many reasons that regulating free college education could hurt our society and economy that people don’t often realize. College education should not be free because it would raise taxes, it would devalue the worth of a college degree, and it would pave the way for more welfare dependency.

With the upcoming elections, third-party candidate Bernie Sanders has been one of the most talked about candidates because of his belief that tuition and cost of living at public colleges and universities should be free. Free college has become one of the most talked about policy proposals on the campaign trail, but questions surround the policy, such as how it would work, how much it would cost and how it would affect students (Rhatican).

dealing with both school and work and balancing paying for bills and even rent. By having the

Free tuition for colleges is a topic that has come up a lot lately in the United States. Especially in the beginning of this year, when the democratic race was in place, Bernie Sanders started making tuition-free colleges one of his campaign points. While there are some that seem to neglect the idea of free tuition, the majority will agree that if not free at least it should be affordable. This topic is a very interesting one because it provides fascinating facts on both sides of the spectrum. One thing people argue against free tuition is that the United States has around 300 million people in population and it could not possibly keep up with the increase in college attendance and cost. On the other hand free tuition in colleges is relative common in almost every first world country around the world and even second and third world countries. Which leaves us to determine that it is not only possible for government to be responsible for education but it seems to be the norm around the world except in the United States. I think that colleges should be tuition free. Community colleges should be funded by the government and the government should not only be responsible in providing free tuition to its citizens but take pride that its citizens have access to free education, making its society an educated one.

In an article by Richard Eskow, “Sanders vs. Clinton: Who Has the Best Plan for America’s College students?” for the most part is committed to compare the variations of the two plans. Eskow starts off by mentioning some facts about society. He then goes into the general purposes of both plans for college finances. Eskow discusses Clinton’s plan and also mentions the ideas of what other Republican candidates plans to do. Lastly, he explains Sanders’ plan and also reflects on the nation. Eskow is comparing the two different plans to explain and show us the differences these two candidates are from one another. In doing so, Eskow has successfully applied all three types of rhetorical appeals, logos, pathos, and ethos, to effectively urge eligible

The United States is a reasonably well off country when it comes to education; we live is a first world country and children are expected to go to school from the age of around five until they graduate from college. As soon as parents find out that they are expecting, they are given the advice to start saving for colleges; College has become increasingly expensive as the years have gone by and many students end up graduating with thousands of dollars in student loans to pay back. Senator Bernie Sanders sees the problem with this and has made it a priority to advocate for lower or maybe even free college tuition. Sanders would sign the “College for All Act” which would make sure that no one would be denied an education simply because of their economic situation.

America is dealing with a student loan debt crisis were are $1.2 trillion in debt and that continues to grow. As college tuition contines to rise and interest rates on student loans are very high it is time to take action. Bernie Sanders wants to make college affordable and lower the rates on students loans. The exigency is the unaffordability of college and the extremely high intrest rates Bernie realizes the problem and now must address education reform.

Bernie Sanders wanted to “…make tuition free at public colleges and universities throughout the country” (Sanders), but in his thirty-second commercial he didn’t have the time to mention how he planned to have Wall Street banks pay for it. His idea to cover the costs of these changes to student tuition was to impose a minuscule tax on Wall Street speculator trades. Sanders declares, “If the taxpayers of this country could bailout Wall Street in 2008, we can make public colleges and universities tuition free and debt free throughout the country” (Sanders). Of course those two entities, the Wall Street bailout and free education are completely unrelated, but Bernie wants to bring them together. His reasoning is that the American public, who suffers from enormous education costs, was forced to pay, involuntarily via their tax money, to save the all-mighty banks from their corrupt dealings in 2008 with a publicly ill-supported bailout, now, he suggests, it’s time for the banks to return the favor, via small taxes on their trades, and help us citizens get educated to expand the country’s economy. That seems like a sound and logical plan. In support of this idea, we find many major countries are already doing exactly as he proposed and succeeding quite well according to Senator Sanders who pronounces, “…some 40 countries throughout the world have imposed a similar tax including Britain, Germany, France, Switzerland, and China” (Sanders). Even with this strong empirical evidence

In 1958, the National Defense Education Act provided college students up to one thousand dollars a year in loans, but the average annual loan was actually only five hundred dollars or less because students could afford the rest of tuition on their own. Interest began at three percent a year after graduation and could usually be paid off in ten years. (Good 590-591) These statistics are a far cry from today’s, with student loan debt surpassing one trillion dollars and many graduates paying off loans well into middle age. As a result of the government shelling out billions of dollars in loans and inflation, colleges have had to increase their tuitions thus creating a college “bubble”. In the past year or so many political leaders have proposed plans to pay for two years of community college, such as President Obama, or for a full four years, such as Bernie Sanders, a frontrunner for the democratic candidacy. Even states like Tennessee,

What is money? What can be bought with money? Are we capable of living without having food, shelter or clothing? The basic essentials are something each person needs and can vary per individual. To obtain these necessities one must have some form of currency to pay for the items. However one must have a job first and that job will only offer the state’s minimum wage. Bernie Sanders believes minimum wage is inadequate and is insufficient for millions of Americans. If a presidential candidate believes that the minimum wage needs reform than there is way of making a living without having to put overtime. Sanders advocates for equal pay regardless of gender which would help to close the wage gap between women and men. Sanders’s Living Wage policy

The words “free college tuition” spark interest in any college student with accumulating debt. In fact, this topic is so incredibly supported that Bernie Sanders implemented it as a core interest in his 2016 campaign. Once Hillary Clinton became the Democratic nominee, she decided to take it on herself with an extensive plan that guaranteed students free tuition. Unsurprisingly, free tuition resonates extremely well within the student demographic. To forty million Americans, free tuition eliminates the largest problem for students: debt (Hess, 2017). However, free college tuition generates the inverse of what these low-income and middle-income students believe. In fact, free college cripples them from multiple perspectives; students will end up spending more financially, will be less likely to graduate with a degree, and will be subjected to more inequality and less exposure.