Donald Trump Controversy

As young adults we are all aware of the camping’s that has been occurring through out the past few months. One of those participants happens to be Donald Trump, who follows the theory of CONFLICT. This theory describes how power from individuals is self-proclaimed. Trump is well known for the many assumptions he has made toward immigrants, primarily Hispanics and Asians. His view on these racial groups demonstrates his consideration toward social life and how it is a competition.

Each person tried to convey their message by bringing up ideas that would allow them to compromise with the people of their nation. It was as if some of the things they said were to better fit the people of their nation instead of saying what their plans for the United States truly would be. This example clearly shows that in current day events, world leaders try to compromise with others whether it is their people or other leaders to become more effective in trying to reach their goal. According to online polls, Donald Trump won the debate because he stated that he would strive to change the United States along with presenting himself as a fighter who would stand up for the American people who feel betrayed and ignored by current leaders. These actions are identified as compromising with the people of the United States showing that leaders are certainly more effective when they are willing to

The passage analyzed in this independent study activity is a speech on immigration delivered by Donald J. Trump in Phoenix on August 31st, 2016. During his speech, Trump clearly asserted his hard-line approach to illegal immigration in United States.

Let’s get the most prominent and most talked about candidate out of the way, Donald Trump. I should first say that I am not a fan by any means. With this being said, I tried to watch the debates with an open mind and tried to look solely at his leadership style. I found Trump to be very defensive, childish, inappropriate, and all over the place. During the debates he loved to talk about how great he is; mentioning four times about his endorsements, about his great friends, and his wealth. Needless to say, he was not able to sway me. I will admit, Trump has extreme confidence. This is a great quality. However, he might just be too confident. It comes off as arrogant. Confidence is great to a certain degree, but it can also get you in trouble. He feels he is the best and everyone would listen to him because he is “Donald Trump”. He is so egotistical. There was one question asked about how Trump would order the military to target families of suspected terrorist after the military testifying the expansive use of torture is inexcusable and will refuse orders because they are illegal. His response: “They won’t refuse; they won’t refuse, believe me”.

In my opinion, on the first 2016 Presidential Debate, Donald Trump and Secretary Hillary Clinton did have a fair debate about topics of the host’s, Lester Holt, choice. Hillary Clinton did, in fact, win. I think this for many reason but some in particular stand out to me.

By complimenting certain communities and groups of people, both candidates utilized peripheral routes to persuasion, as well as liking in the debate. Scarcity was highlighted when Trump complimented himself in regards to his business know-how, while condemning Clinton for lacking this knowledge, and Clinton also demonstrated this principle by acting more diplomatic than he was through her calm persona. By making investments in communities, Trump is hoping that the voters in these areas will express their gratitude by reciprocating their votes, and Clinton also hopes that middle class voters will do the same since she has helped to make employment more available in the past

Trump was basically telling the people what they wanted to hear and I thought he was doing pretty good. On the other hand he also wasnt answering the questions the way they needed to be answered. In the debate Hilary talks about how we should start small companies in to increase the work for everyone. While Trump is trying to lower everything, Hilary wants people to have a fair job and wants the wealthy to help out the people by donating clothes or anything else to get involved. Trump on the other hand, wants the companies to stop moving around to different states just stay in one location. Throughtout this debate, I believe Trump is accusing Hilary for Americas debt and how he is basically saying its increased by 2 because of President Barack Obama. However, Hilary is not pointing any fingers at

Both candidates have obviously shown all the aspects of trust to the American people based on how far they have made it in the election. In the first debate, Hillary and Trump are on the hot seat to show their relevance to be the next presidential candidate. And one of the most important parts of being president is to show they can be trusted. To show experience Trump relies on his businessman attributes, while Hillary relies on her experience as secretary of state, first lady, senator, etc. One thing that stuck out to me early in the debate is when Hillary brings up her granddaughters 2nd birthday which occurred on the day of the debate (3:00). This shows not only to the voters but to trump that she wants to see change, she wants her granddaughter to have a bright future. This not only gives the voters something to remember her by, but they can trust she will do everything to make America a safer place for future generations. Trump sees that he doesn’t have the experience, but

After watching thirty minutes of both the Republican debate and the Democrat debate it is very evident the differences between the political parties. The Republican race is very different from the democratic debate because of the level of competition. After only a brief time in watching both races it is evident who the moderators feel are front runners in this year's election. The Republican debate was very competitive because of the larger amount of people running. Each candidate did not have enough time to fully debate topics because of there are just too many people up at the podium. Some of the Republican candidates make it priority to follows Reagan's rule of talking about the fellow candidates but, others such as Bush and Trump try

None of the candidates were really prepared for a logical appeals debate and frequently diverted to emotional appeals. Ted Cruz turned to Megyn Kelly at one point, “Do you think the voters at home want this to be the type of debate that is playing out?” That was a strong emotional appeal, because with all the mocking and bickering and yelling the debate was troubling to watch. That moment where he asked the viewers if this is what they wanted was great for building positive face with voters, even when he was doing some of the bickering himself. Trump uses the San Bernandino and Paris attacks as frequently as he can as an emotional appeal. He also used a bit of humor when he implied that he had a large penis. John Kasich’s emotional appeal go-to is, “I want to bring people together.” Rubio made a great joke after Donald yelled that he’s not doing yoga, “But he’s so flexible you’d never know it,” clearly referencing an earlier point in the debate where Donald claimed his core value is “being flexible.” The most effective ethical appeals came from Cruz and Kasich, who both cited their experience and political records several times in response to moderator’s questions. Trump’s ethical appeals weren’t solid, because the moderators fact-checked him almost every time and reported that 73% of his statements were either false or some degree of false. While the GOP appeals mostly consisted of emotional appeals, the Democrats were very heavy on all three kinds. Bernie explained his tax plans carefully and in detail and Hillary explained her solution to American jobs being exported with facts. Bernie and Hillary were in Flint, so both of them used the situation with the poison water to their advantage, making emotional appeals to parents and they agreed on that issue in an effective way. The last and most heavily talked about appeals in this debate were the ethical appeals. Both candidates were

(Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton) are more concerned and after each other than the US. Both candidate Hillary and Trump can be great presidents if only they would stop trying to make the US into their own world. What the two candidates say could affect them winning the election so they should think before the speak. Debaters should speak from

This first presidential debate was chaos! The two candidates were just screaming over one another, and I couldn’t hear myself think! The night started out normal, or as normal as a debate is supposed to be. The two candidates seemed composed for a small period of time while acting like actual adults running for president. Unfortunately, when the first question about the economy was asked, Former Secretary Clinton decided to take a jab at Mr. Trump using a quote he had said about a potential real estate market crash in 2006. She quoted that Mr. Trump hoped for the market to crash so he could potentially buy it. To respond, Mr. Trump interrupted her and countered, "That's called business, by the way." This remark

Simply saying something a certain way could be the difference between defeat and the seat in the White House. While vying for support, each candidate had their own strengths and weaknesses which set them apart from the other. Who exactly won the debate is a matter of opinion, which will be finally decided this

In the first presidential debate, between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, Clinton won the debate convincingly. She won the debate because she was able to answer the questions that were asked by the moderator, Lester Holt, in a polished manner. Clinton demonstrated that she was much more prepared than Trump by answering the questions with facts and details, as well as occasional pokes at Trump. Clinton's strengths were that she was more prepared and had done more research than Trump. This was obvious when she answered all the questions completely and in-depth unlike Trump. Clinton's weaknesses were that she may have over prepared for the debate. At times it seemed like she had rehearsed the answers instead of talking from her heart and this

A consensus stemming from the media is that Secretary Clinton was definitely the winner of the debate, but the race for the presidency is hardly over. Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post writes, “At times she came across as overly rehearsed and robotic… She was, unsurprisingly, very well prepared – using a slew of facts and figures to not only make her positive case but also to slam Trump.” Clinton had clearly done her homework and was prepared with witty comebacks to Trump’s usual feisty remarks, as well as, clear plans for our country which she masterfully weaved together to make the most of her two-minute responses. He, on the other hand, did his best to bring up topics he is comfortable talking about like the 33,000 emails deleted off