This article is about the presidential nominee Donald Trump, the writer talks about the nominee's view about certain races and religions and his formal life as a billionaire, corporate owner and reality tv star If we look closely into the article, we will see that the writer is criticizing the presidential nominee and we would conclude that considering the writer's choice of words or diction as he used certain terms or tags such as and I quote emphasize'the pro-Hitler Charles Lindbergh'' in which he later compares trump to in the same paragraph. And if we read paragraph three, it is written and the part reads: ''In 1940 Wendell Willkie, a wealthy businessman who had never served in a political office became the republican nominee ''I will be under obligation to nobody except the people'' said Willkie- an argument Mr. Trump appropriated, Willkie lost, but he made Franklin Roosevelt work hard for his win.'' in which we can see that he compared Willkie to Trump, as a wealthy businessman who was never had never served in a political office to the presidential nominee, he implies that Trump was only put in the presidential race, just to put Clinton in a place where she would work hard to win. …show more content…
At the end like I said, it is more of a critical view than a neutral opinion. In spite of all Trump's mistakes or as mentioned in the article ''broke rules'', the world would prefer a neutral view rather than a critical
As young adults we are all aware of the camping’s that has been occurring through out the past few months. One of those participants happens to be Donald Trump, who follows the theory of CONFLICT. This theory describes how power from individuals is self-proclaimed. Trump is well known for the many assumptions he has made toward immigrants, primarily Hispanics and Asians. His view on these racial groups demonstrates his consideration toward social life and how it is a competition.
Liberal leaning New York Times (NYT) columnist Charles M. Blow, in his op-ed, "No, Trump, We Can’t Just Get Along", recounts Trumps tirade of controversial, racist and bigoted proclamations which dominated the 2016 presidential campaign season. His column ranked 21 out of 100 of NYT’s most-read articles in 2016 (New York Times). Blow's purpose is to give his mostly liberal audience permission to reject President-elect Trump’s dismissive attitude about his record and additionally, to convey that message of rejection to his colleagues in the media who appear complacent about holding Trump accountable. He adopts an angry chastising tone to establish himself as an authority and to appeal to similar feelings of his readers.
November 8, 2016. As the clock ticked from day to dust, the American population sat down to the conclusion of the forty fifth presidential election. Within moments, the fate of the nation was broadcasted into the homes and hearts of millions. For the some, the results of the election bought upon a sense of joy and excitement. However, for the other half of America’s citizens, hearing the call for Trump to presidency emitted feelings of sadness, disappointment, and above all else, confusion. How did a multi-billionaire businessman defeat a former First Lady of the United States and Secretary of State to become the president on the United States? In fact, how did a man of such little constitutional knowledge obtain the amount of political attention
Devinatz focuses the article on the similarities between the new president elect, Donald J. Trump and the 1968 election of George Wallace. Devinatz informs the reader that while Donald Trump’ presidency was an event that took the nation by surprise, mostly white union members voted for Trump just like they voted for Wallace because their campaign strategy was similar. Devinatz exclaims that Wallace used comparable rhetoric to Trump’s to get the crowd on his side at rallies, the rhetoric they both used was racial rhetoric. Wallace and Trump used the racial fears that immigrants and people of color would take the white Americans jobs to get the votes and gain political power. The overall argument Devinatz is making is that presidential canidates
Donald Trump’s nomination can be clearly seen as not the result of electoral flubs or the chance of history, but the result of a decades old movement. In campaign after campaign there have been candidates appealing to the same nativist tendencies, and voters who support them. It further shows another instance of a movement building within and without a party ultimately capturing the party and nominating one of their own. In Bryan’s, Reagan 's, Clinton, and Trump’s cases political commentators at the time were stunned that the party bosses could be so
His use of negative diction paints Trump in a way that is irresponsible and unqualified, as well as only driven by money. He follows up this by using hyperboles. In addition to exaggerating missteps that the president has taken, he exploits them to convey a point to the reader. All in all, Epstein is very successful at crafting a subjective article. He is extremely efficient at convincing the reader that Trump is unqualified by pointing out his many
Jen Lemos is very objective when writing in the article. Lemos sticks with the information he got and doesn’t tell much about his own opinion. There is none form of appeal in the newspaper. He writes about what Liza Kessler and Judith Mellen talks about and their opinion.
Trump is our president in-elect, he will soon be the chief in command of our nation, and many are desperately worried about the future of America. Some people still won’t accept that Clinton lost while others are thrilled over the presidential election of Donald Trump. In Thomas Friedman's article Donald Trump Voters, Just Hear Me Out, he doesn’t necessarily agree with the decisions of either nominee, however he believes that Clinton will be the lesser of two evils. On the other hand of the spectrum, Deroy Murdock an extreme conservative firmly believes Trump’s presidential approach can solve the many problems in America according to his article Trump Can End Double Standard of Justice. However, being an extreme conservative he also believes
With this year being the year that a new president takes over, there has been a lot of news surfacing that may or may not be true. When looking at an article we must look at different criteria of things like the facts used, names mentioned, publication dates, and altogether the article and what it is saying.
Unexpectedly, the front-runner in the Republican presidential race is the one guy that no one expected to be a serious candidate. Donald Trump has leaped ahead of the rest of the Republican field, making friends and enemies alike. Since his controversial announcement speech, polling has put him squarely in the two of popular GOP candidates along with presumed leader Jeb Bush. As startling as this is to many, it is even more alarming to those parts of the GOP who are trying to broaden their appeal and reach out to minorities. Already, many political operatives are doing damage control in the wake of Mr. Trump 's path and others are trying to tie his racist statements into the fabric of the Republican party itself.
The author, Lerone Bennett Jr, begins the passage with an extremely bold statement: “Lincoln was not the Great Emancipator.” His opening statement automatically contradicts everything everyone has been taught about Abraham Lincoln. The author’s main argument throughout the article is that Abraham Lincoln was not a hero and that he was a flawed and prejudice man. Lincoln never pretended to be something he was not. According to the article Lincoln was a firm believer in white supremacy. The author argues that Lincoln’s personality, his clever use of speech, and his assassination all drown out the “real Lincoln”. Lincoln was later used as more of a figurehead by the people to help deal with social problems. The Emancipation Proclamation contradicted his beliefs in white supremacy. Lincoln’s eloquent use of
After watching the presidential debate, Thomas L. Friedman wrote an opinion article for The New York Times titled “Trump? How Could We?”. Friedman's purpose in writing the article was to showcase Donald Trump's lack of qualifications to be president. Friedman effectively does so by appealing to the emotions of his audience and by establishing a connection between himself and his audience.
Donald Trump’s latest remarks have brought him under a lot of criticism; however these comments hasn’t hurt his political campaign and, it seems that he is coming closer to becoming president, due to this he faced much scrutiny from the Israeli’s who stopped his visit to Israel . He said he would rather meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after he gets to be president. The change of arrangements comes as Mr. Trump, the Republican presidential candidate, has made a big firestorm with his proposition to banish Muslims from entering the United States. Mr. Trump was wanting to meet with Mr. Netanyahu, who frequently invites American presidential candidates. Be that as it may, the Israeli executive confronted reaction over the meeting
Do you read, follow, or pay attention to CNN, ABC, or NBC’s News? NO! According to President Donald Trump, all these companies share “FAKE NEWS”! On February 6th, 2017, Trump tweeted, “Any negative polls are fake news, just like the CNN, ABC, NBC polls in the election. Sorry, people want border security and extreme vetting” (@realDonaldTrump). A few minutes later he tweeted, “I call my own shots, largely based on an accumulation of data, and everyone knows it. Some FAKE NEWS media, in order to marginalize, lies!” (@realDonaldTrump). For a while now, there has been an overwhelming amount of media focused on Donald Trump’s actions. Apparently, news companies such as CNN, ABC, and NBC have been sharing false polls and news lately causing Trump’s
Donald’s Trump’s victory in the 2016 election is very complex. The political mishaps that have occurred since JFK’s presidency reshaped the American psyche of who the president should be. This chain of dissatisfaction with the federal government led the American people to hope for a president who is honest, free of corruption, and supportive of the middle class. Trump recognized the American need for a new kind of president and took on a persona that perfectly exemplified this. The Trump Mythology is the belief that Donald Trump is a transparent, honest politician; however, this is only part of the equation. Belief in the Trump Mythology contributed to his victory, but it is also important to acknowledge the respective roles of demographics, voter turnout, and Hillary Clinton’s flaws. An interesting difference between the Kennedy Mythology and the Trump Mythology that is worth noting is the role of the media. Throughout the Kennedy Era, popular media fed the people’s fascination of Kennedy’s Camelot, perpetuating the mythology. Donald Trump, however, was largely hated by popular culture. American media ultimately discounted Donald Trump as a viable contender for the presidency.