Double Compensation Essay

Rooted in our civilization, restorative justice was once viewed as a sin against a sovereign society of a King, Queen, or Emperor. Albert Eglash (1975) first articulated restorative justice over retributive and rehabilitative justice, an indeed search for the original status of security of the victim’s feelings. Restorative Justice, a more victim-centered aspect of punishment than the offender, however, the victim should consider, what it is that restorative justice will restore to its original state of security, and would it be enough justice that the victim seeks.

Often, when a criminal is sentenced to the death penalty for committing a murder, people begin to question the legality and morality of it, and try to defend or attack it. One of the first few things that come to mind when people try to defend the death penalty is the statement, “an eye for an eye,” or the principle of lex talionis, meaning we treat people the way they have treated others (Textbook, 538). Although this argument is well-backed up, it does not always prove to be the best principle when determining the type of punishment, one deserves. Stephen Nathanson, an abolitionist to the death penalty, discusses this idea in his article “An Eye for and Eye,” specifically within his argument stating that equality retributivism does not justify the death penalty and that it should be rejected (Textbook, 539). Equality retributivism, which is the idea that we penalize criminals with punishments that are equal to their crimes, serves as a great principle for some crimes but not all. I find this statement, along with Nathanson’s argument, to be true because not all crimes can have a punishment equal to it. Throughout this paper, I will discuss Nathanson’s argument, some objections raised, and lastly, whether the objection succeeds or not.

Fourth, should all taxpayers bear the cost of reparations, or only those descended from slaveowners or from those who lived in the slave states? The list of such technocratic questions - none of them fanciful - could be extended endlessly.

Henry argues that African Americans should be compensated for slavery comparable to the Japanese Interment that occurred in the U.S, however, since those commited the crime mostly are deceased or non-identifiable, African Americans who’s ancestor was a slave should receive a compensatory. Individuals in the U.S continue to be opposed when being mentioned reparations. “A national ABC News poll in June and July 2000 revealed that 77 percent of Whites believed that no Black people should be compensated, while 19 percent thought that only those whose ancestors were slaves should be compensated.” (Henry, pp. 92). Therefore, the idea of compensation for slavery is not prevalent in today’s society. Senator Patrick Leahy said, “There have always been bad things that have happened to people. Slavery was awful. But I don’t think there is anything to be gained by going backward to try to come up with some way to pay for something that you can’t put a monetary price tag on”. Politicians are finding explanations to not pay back those families who are really impacted from the enslavement of many African Americans.

Compensation culture is a culture where individuals try to get compensation for any loss, damage, or suffering caused by another individual. This commonly stretches to include incidents that have weak or insubstantial links between the claimant and defendant (Horsey and Rackley 2009). Lord Falconer the former Lord Chancellor defines compensation culture as

For many years the United States has committed atrocious and discriminatory acts against African Americans. In a seemingly more “equal” society today many are wondering what debt is owed to the descendants of African Americans. According to Alfred Brophy of University of North Carolina, reparations are defined as, “programs that are justified on the basis of past harm and that are also designated to assess and correct that harm and improve the lives of victims in the future.” Throughout this paper I will be discussing whether reparations should be paid to African Americans. I will evaluate the question through legal, moral, and political lenses. I will evaluate the start of the movement of reparations while also taking into consideration how reparations have been given in the past. I will also explore new forms/types of reparations that can be given to African Americans. I will also determine the short and long term impacts the implementation of reparations would have on African American society and the society in its entirety.

The article, “The Case for Reparations”, presents itself with a commendable representation on how the need for reparations is essential when combined with the brutal history of slavery and progression of blacks in American Society after slavery. Ta- Nehisi Coates argues that the relationship between racial identity and reparations is based upon America’s debt to blacks for the countless years of injustice. With this he demonstrates how white supremacy has ultimately used impractical measures to maintain what they consider social stability for those who were not African American.

People have a tendency of ascribing external stimuli as reasons for actions and behaviour of man. If a person becomes a criminal, we look for reasons in his background and social setting. However, it is not always necessary that a poor person will take to crime to alleviate his misery.

So why shouldn't the great-great grandchildren of those who worked for free and were deprived of education and were kept in bondage not be compensated? Why

In the article, “The case for Reparations” by Ta-Nehisi Coates, the author examined African American history as it relates to slavery and oppression. The article discussed slavery experiences, unjust laws, current issues, and reparation ideas. Coates (2014) examined past events that occurred to prevent African Americans from being equal to whites. According to Coates (2014) African Americans were vulnerable because they did not have protection from law. The article discussed how African Americans suffered many loses due to whites such as voting rights, taxes, and property lost. African Americans were still at a disadvantage when certain laws were put into place in their favor. Coates (2014) gives great insight of the unfairness and hardships. The article also gives great examples of current issues that African Americans encounter in today’s society, such as health care and employment. Coates (2014) main purpose is to encourage readers that African Americans deserve compensation for years of oppression. The author also believes that reparation is necessary and would be very beneficial.

The criminal justice system views any crime as a crime committed against the state and places much emphasis on retribution and paying back to the community, through time, fines or community work. Historically punishment has been a very public affair, which was once a key aspect of the punishment process, through the use of the stocks, dunking chair, pillory, and hangman’s noose, although in today’s society punishment has become a lot more private (Newburn, 2007). However it has been argued that although the debt against the state has been paid, the victim of the crime has been left with no legal input to seek adequate retribution from the offender, leaving the victim perhaps feeling unsatisfied with the criminal justice process.

Reparations? Just the term stirs up controversy, along with endless amounts of questions that are still to be answered. Should reparations be awarded? Is it feasible? Who should receive it? In what forms should it be given? These are only a few of the most important questions that need to be answered. To answer these questions, I will draw on the research conducted for my country study and the panel debates that were conducted over the past weeks. To fully understand my reasoning you must be informed of the approaches discussed on both sides of these debates.

Thanks for your informative post, I agree, pay for performance is a reimbursement method aimed at improving the experiences of patients at various health institutions. This method as you mentioned is becoming popular among health care policymakers and health care insurers. it is a method based on incentive paid by health care insurers to providers to encourage the overall improvement of providers’ healthcare services to their patients . The pay for performance is considering a method of reimbursement that has shifted much of the financial risks to the providers of health care. The shift in risks to providers could be a double-edged sword. For one, the method can be credited for allowing physicians accountability for costs containment and wellbeing of their patients to be emphasized within the health arena. On the other hand, P4P could result in physicians enrolling patients with less complicated health problems in the practices, or it could lead to physicians avoiding healthcare facilities in poorer neighborhoods with many chronic ill patients. That said, researchers do not concur that the pay for

Murray Compensation, Inc. (Murray), an SEC registrant that provides payroll processing and benefit administration services to other companies, granted 100,000 “at-the-money” employee share options on January 1, 2006. The awards have a grant-date fair value of $6, vest at the end of the third year of service (cliff-vesting), and have an exercise price of $21.

Hythloday harshly condemns the “two justices” seen in European politics: where the common people are subject to the laws, while the princes are not (76). Justice must, in his view, be applied equally. This example implies justice consists of giving retributions to those who deserve them: the specific individuals wronged or society at large. Hythloday also argues it is unjust for the state to extract restitutions for a theft, rather than giving them to the rightful owner (23). He gives the example of the Polyerites, a fictional society in which thieves are forced to pay reparations to the person they stole from and to labor in the benefit of the community. These last two examples represent the collusion of power and so-called justice. A society