Manfred Pfister suggests a double deviance, one in the synchronic dimension, the other on the diachronic, as distinctive of dramatic speech which deviates from “ordinary” language but can deviate internally from the tradition of dramatic language or styles which are in force. Instances of the former include neologisms, archaisms and highly stylised, metred language, as in verse drama written by T.S Eliot. Participants use speech for various purposes between participants: to socialize, to communicate thoughts, opinions or emotions, to share thoughts, feelings, emotions, to offer to do things for others, to ask other to do things, to congratulate, to insult, to quarrel etc. Therefore, the notion of language use makes language a tool – Bollinger
Talking, it is a form of communication that we as people do because it is our human nature to. AS humans “conversation is a ritual” (327), we speak without thinking of other meanings that our words could mean. We don’t think about appropriation, the way others may think, or take other feelings into account. WE as humans speak to interact because as mentioned earlier “Conversation is a ritual” (327). When it comes to talking there is no right way, the way society communicates it can “mislead, distort, inflate, circumvent, obfuscate” one another.
2.1 People communicate to let other people know their needs and wishes. They also need to tell others if they are in pain and how they are feeling, and to put their anxieties at ease.
1.4 Analyse reasons why an individual may use a form of communication that is not based on formal language.
People communicate in different ways to help social interaction. Communication is not just though words it can also be though touch, facial expressions and body movement as well as written electronic messages.
Communication is one of the requirements in a life. Human are social creature, they are depend on each other helps. Human communicate to fulfill their social needs.
Language plays a role in motivation and response and the effects of social life language plays an important role in how language is used. How people define the social situation, their perception of others, what they think and believe will form the content of their act of speaking (Gilbert, Fisk & Lindsey 1998).
Answer: D, pg. 43. “If we communicated by grunts and gestures, we would be limited to a short time span- to events taking place, those that have just taken place, or those that will take place immediately- a sort of slightly extended present.” “Without language, we would have few memories, for we associate experiences with words and then use those words to recall the experience.” “Language also extends our time horizons forward. Because language enables us to agree on times, dates, and places, it allows us to plan activities with one another.” “When we talk with one another, we are exchanging ideas about events; that is, we are sharing perspectives. Our words are the embodiment of our experiences, distilled into a readily exchangeable form, one that is mutually understandable to people who have learned that language.”
In a genre that contradicts a novelist's affluence of narrative explication, the language in its purest form becomes Shakespeare's powerful instrument, wherein he controls it with the unusual combination of force, subtlety, and exactitude”
Our basic mean of communication among species and interspecies is thru language. Language enables us to communicate with each other, our thoughts and feelings, ideas and concepts, likes, and dislikes, fears, dreams
One advantage of language is the ability to communicate fast and effectively. It allows us to create and understand sentences that are useful to communicate with other human beings. By knowing how to communicate fast and effectively can then allow us to interact with other people without even using words. For instance, sometimes just by looking at someone, making a body gesture or even making a simplistic sound can be a way of communicating. We have enabled this to happen due to the practice and use of language as a way of communication over time.
The expression ‘Conversation Analysis’ is at this point solidly settled as the name for a specific worldview in the investigation of verbal communication that was started in the 1960s by Harvey Sacks, as a team with Emanuel Schegloff and Gail Jefferson. In Conversation Analysis the attention is on the procedural examination of talk-in-cooperation, how members deliberately sort out their connections to take care of a scope of authoritative issues, for example, the dispersion of turns at talking, the community oriented creation of specific activities, or issues of comprehension. The investigation is constantly in view of sound or visual recordings of collaboration, which are precisely interpreted in subtle elements. The exploration ought to be data driven, as in ideas and speculations ought to be founded on watchful thoughts of the information, recordings and transcripts, as opposed to drawn from hypothetical assumptions or ideological inclinations. While initially imagined from a sociological point of view, Conversation Analysis picked up a far reaching gathering in numerous parts of the world by scientists from a scope of disciplinary foundations, including: brain science, human sciences, correspondence ponders and an assortment of phonetic sub-disciplines. As a
A wise man once said, “Words are singularly the most powerful force available to humanity. We can choose to use this force constructively with words of encouragement, or destructively using words of despair. Words have energy and power with the ability to help, to heal, to hinder, to hurt, to harm, to humiliate and to humble.” Our experiences with communication and the relationships we build because of it is due to the intricate mechanisms of speech and how it is produced. Although the structures involved in the production of speech are designed for biological purposes, humans have learned that speech is an overlaid function. The process of communication involves the parts of the brain accountable for speech in a receptive and expressive manner known as the Speech Chain. There are three essential and inextricable mechanisms responsible for the production of speech: respiration, phonation, and articulation.
Since the beginning of time, humans utilized the mechanism of speech to interact with each other and to gain specific needs and benefits. The emergence of Homo sapiens finally revolutionized the way humans achieve what they wants. Humans are assumed as a magnificent creature and consequently each cultures has its own tale on how we became exist and prominent on the Earth (Long, 1963). Speech and language are among the pivotal keys to the purposes of social communication. In this paper, I will discuss about the foundation of speech in humans.
The use of language and the patterns of different kind of behavior and values in a society gives a social direction to a person. Language influences the perception on individual lives in a community. It indicates that to which family of culture does a person belong to. Language can be taken as central point of a cultural aspect. Language in itself is the combination of different symbols, expression and ideas. And the idea and thoughts which people think and share with each other either verbally or nonverbally. Language helps a person to easily convey his message of thoughts to other person and to share their reality, experiences, feelings and knowledge. The use of different languages enables a society to create their own identity and to distinct them from outsiders thus the society can maintain its societal solidarity and boundaries. It can also be used as a tool to translate the expressions of abstract concepts and to differ the transmitting culture between the generations. The correct use of language helps people to describe relationships rather than judging or evaluate between the nature of others. Language also portraits the reality of a society indeed which are not in fronting thought must be viewed as important. This medium to communicate with other in a society has been passed down for centuries as legacy. It is the language which represents a country in front of others, and thus become a main source of
3- Recognizes that we use language to get things done: we speak a language in order to communicate with others (e.g. we want to express likes and dislikes, ask somebody’s hobbies, find directions to a place).